Schinkel Christian, Anastasiadis Alexander P
Department of Surgery, BG Kliniken Bergmannsheil, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2008 Dec;14(6):685-9. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0b013e328319650b.
Despite improved care of multiple injured patients, controversial data about the best time point for decompression and stabilization of spine fractures and spinal cord injuries are published. Some studies even question the value of surgical management.
In several mostly retrospective studies and a meta-analysis, there is growing evidence that early decompression and stabilization of spine injuries seems to be beneficial, especially in more severely injured patients. Early stabilization seems to reduce length of stay and pulmonary complications. Some studies report on improved neurological outcome and improved survival; however, other new studies add controversial data.
Most studies support the hypothesis that early decompression and stabilization of spine injuries is beneficial in terms of reducing length of stay at the ICU, as well as improving neurological and overall outcome. Good prospective clinical trials are still missing, thus the level of evidence remains low.
尽管对多发伤患者的治疗有所改善,但关于脊柱骨折和脊髓损伤减压与稳定的最佳时间点仍有存在争议的数据发表。一些研究甚至质疑手术治疗的价值。
在几项大多为回顾性研究和一项荟萃分析中,越来越多的证据表明,早期对脊柱损伤进行减压和稳定似乎是有益的,尤其是在伤势更严重的患者中。早期稳定似乎可以缩短住院时间并减少肺部并发症。一些研究报告了神经功能改善和生存率提高的情况;然而,其他新研究提供了有争议的数据。
大多数研究支持这样的假设,即早期对脊柱损伤进行减压和稳定在缩短重症监护病房住院时间以及改善神经功能和总体预后方面是有益的。目前仍缺乏良好的前瞻性临床试验,因此证据水平仍然较低。