Coster Samantha, Norman Ian
Florence Nightingale School of Nursing and Midwifery, Division of Health and Social Care, King's College, London, UK.
Int J Nurs Stud. 2009 Apr;46(4):508-28. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2008.09.009. Epub 2008 Nov 13.
The burden of chronic disease on healthcare services worldwide is growing and the increased development of educational interventions which help patients to better manage their own conditions is evident internationally.
This paper reports on findings of a review of Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions designed to improve patients' knowledge and skills to manage chronic disease, with particular reference to nursing contribution and practice.
Thirty Cochrane systematic reviews were identified as meeting the inclusion criteria. Data were extracted and summarised.
The majority of reviews included in this paper were judged by Cochrane reviewers to provide inadequate evidence (n=18, 60%) of the effectiveness of the interventions reviewed. Information on the professional delivering the interventions was often not available, although 77% (23) of reviews mentioned that nurses were involved in a proportion of studies.
Educational programmes have definite benefits for patients suffering from asthma and are promising for interventions in areas such as diabetes mellitus, epilepsy and mental health. However, it still is not clear what the active ingredients of many successful interventions are.
慢性病给全球医疗服务带来的负担日益加重,国际上帮助患者更好地管理自身病情的教育干预措施也在不断增加。
本文报告了一项对Cochrane系统评价的综述结果,该系统评价旨在改善患者管理慢性病的知识和技能,特别提及护理方面的贡献和实践。
确定了30项符合纳入标准的Cochrane系统评价。提取并总结了数据。
本文纳入的大多数综述被Cochrane评审员判定为所审查干预措施有效性的证据不足(n = 18,60%)。虽然77%(23项)的综述提到护士参与了部分研究,但关于实施干预措施的专业人员的信息往往无法获取。
教育项目对哮喘患者有明确益处,对糖尿病、癫痫和心理健康等领域的干预也很有前景。然而,许多成功干预措施的有效成分仍不明确。