• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

可重复使用和一次性使用的超声剪在腹腔镜减重手术中的成本比较。

Cost comparison of reusable and single-use ultrasonic shears for laparoscopic bariatric surgery.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Weill College of Medicine of Cornell University, New York, NY 10021, USA.

出版信息

Obes Surg. 2010 Apr;20(4):512-8. doi: 10.1007/s11695-008-9723-4. Epub 2008 Nov 18.

DOI:10.1007/s11695-008-9723-4
PMID:19015932
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Use of ultrasonic shears is currently the standard for advanced laparoscopic digestive surgery. The costs of medical care continue to increase, yet the amount of evidence-based information on cost differences in reusable and single-use equipment is scarce.

METHODS

All bariatric laparoscopic cases in our division that required the use of ultrasonic shears were observed during a 7-month period. The reusable and single-use scalpels were alternated weekly. Associated expenses (replacements, cleaning, sterilization), blood loss, complications, and ease-of-use were assessed. The total cost and cost per case for the two types of scalpels were calculated and compared.

RESULTS

Eighty-five cases with both the single-use and reusable scalpels were evaluated. Both groups of cases were comparable in type of surgeries and patient demographics. No significant difference in operation time (reusable, 156 +/- 15 min; single-use, 174 +/- 15 min; p = 0.34) or ease-of-use was noted. The equipment failure rate (one replacement each), complications, and estimated blood loss (reusable, 63 +/- 11 mL; single-use, 83 +/- 12 mL; p = 0.06) were similar. A total cost saving of $15,163 resulted from the use and processing of the reusable equipment. Using the reusable shears for 85 cases, the cost-per-case saving was $196.40.

CONCLUSIONS

The reusable scalpel had a cost saving over single-use scalpel that increased with the number of cases. The reusable scalpel resulted in significant cost savings without impact on complication rate and ease-of-use.

摘要

背景

目前,超声刀的使用是高级腹腔镜消化手术的标准。医疗费用持续上涨,但关于可重复使用和一次性设备成本差异的循证信息却很少。

方法

在 7 个月的时间里,我们部门所有需要使用超声刀的减肥腹腔镜手术都进行了观察。每周交替使用可重复使用和一次性手术刀。评估相关费用(更换、清洁、消毒)、失血量、并发症和易用性。计算并比较两种手术刀的总成本和每例成本。

结果

评估了 85 例使用一次性和可重复使用手术刀的病例。两组病例的手术类型和患者人口统计学特征相似。手术时间(可重复使用,156 +/- 15 分钟;一次性使用,174 +/- 15 分钟;p = 0.34)或易用性无显著差异。设备故障率(各更换一次)、并发症和估计失血量(可重复使用,63 +/- 11 毫升;一次性使用,83 +/- 12 毫升;p = 0.06)相似。使用可重复使用设备可节省 15,163 美元的总费用。使用可重复使用手术刀进行 85 例手术,每例手术节省成本 196.40 美元。

结论

与一次性手术刀相比,可重复使用手术刀具有成本节约优势,且随着病例数量的增加而增加。可重复使用手术刀在不影响并发症发生率和易用性的情况下,可显著节省成本。

相似文献

1
Cost comparison of reusable and single-use ultrasonic shears for laparoscopic bariatric surgery.可重复使用和一次性使用的超声剪在腹腔镜减重手术中的成本比较。
Obes Surg. 2010 Apr;20(4):512-8. doi: 10.1007/s11695-008-9723-4. Epub 2008 Nov 18.
2
Single-use versus reusable laparoscopic surgical instruments: a comparative cost analysis.一次性与可重复使用的腹腔镜手术器械:成本比较分析
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995 Dec;173(6):1812-5. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(95)90432-8.
3
A prospective comparison of the costs of reusable and limited-reuse laparoscopic instruments.可重复使用和有限次重复使用腹腔镜器械成本的前瞻性比较。
Can J Surg. 1998 Apr;41(2):136-41.
4
[Disposable versus reusable instruments in laparoscopic surgery--a controlled study].[腹腔镜手术中一次性器械与可重复使用器械的对照研究]
Zentralbl Chir. 1995;120(1):47-52.
5
Comparison of economic and environmental impacts between disposable and reusable instruments used for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.腹腔镜胆囊切除术使用的一次性器械和可重复使用器械的经济与环境影响比较。
Surg Endosc. 2005 Feb;19(2):268-72. doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-9232-4. Epub 2004 Dec 9.
6
A comparison of reusable versus disposable laparoscopic instrument costs.可重复使用与一次性使用腹腔镜器械成本的比较。
Aust N Z J Surg. 1996 Oct;66(10):671-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1996.tb00715.x.
7
Systematic review of reusable versus disposable laparoscopic instruments: costs and safety.可重复使用与一次性使用腹腔镜器械的系统评价:成本与安全性
ANZ J Surg. 2017 Jan;87(1-2):28-33. doi: 10.1111/ans.13856. Epub 2016 Nov 23.
8
[Do costs decide? Disposable or reusable instruments in laparoscopic cholecystectomy?].[成本决定一切吗?腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的一次性器械还是可重复使用器械?]
Chirurg. 1994 Apr;65(4):317-25.
9
Disposable versus reusable biopsy forceps: a prospective cost evaluation.一次性活检钳与可重复使用活检钳:一项前瞻性成本评估。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2000 Mar;51(3):262-5. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(00)70352-x.
10
A cost and performance evaluation of disposable and reusable biopsy forceps in GI endoscopy.一次性和可重复使用活检钳在胃肠内镜检查中的成本与性能评估
Gastrointest Endosc. 2000 Mar;51(3):266-70. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(00)70353-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding and quantifying the environmental impact of sterile medical devices: a carbon footprint study of single-use electrosurgical scalpels and their reusable alternatives.了解并量化无菌医疗器械的环境影响:一次性使用电外科手术刀及其可重复使用替代品的碳足迹研究。
BMJ Surg Interv Health Technol. 2025 Jul 3;7(1):e000348. doi: 10.1136/bmjsit-2024-000348. eCollection 2025.
2
Beyond single-use: a systematic review of environmental, economic, and clinical impacts of endoscopic surgical instrumentation.一次性使用之外:内镜手术器械的环境、经济和临床影响的系统评价
Int J Surg. 2024 Dec 1;110(12):8136-8150. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000002141.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Hospital costs associated with bariatric procedures in the United States.美国与减肥手术相关的医院费用。
Am J Surg. 2005 Nov;190(5):816-20. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.07.026.
2
The impact of laparoscopy on bariatric surgery.腹腔镜检查对减肥手术的影响。
Surg Endosc. 2005 May;19(5):621-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-004-8164-y. Epub 2005 Mar 11.
3
National medical spending attributable to overweight and obesity: how much, and who's paying?国家因超重和肥胖导致的医疗支出:数额多少,由谁买单?
Carbon footprints in minimally invasive surgery: Good patient outcomes, but costly for the environment.
微创手术中的碳足迹:对患者疗效良好,但对环境成本高昂。
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 Jul 27;15(7):1277-1285. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i7.1277.
4
Personal respiratory protection and resiliency in a pandemic, the evolving disposable versus reusable debate and its effect on waste generation.大流行中的个人呼吸防护与适应能力、一次性与可重复使用之争的演变及其对废物产生的影响。
Resour Conserv Recycl. 2021 May;168:105262. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105262. Epub 2020 Nov 20.
5
Reprocessed single-use devices in laparoscopy: assessment of cost, environmental impact, and patient safety.腹腔镜手术中一次性使用器械的再处理:成本、环境影响及患者安全评估
Surg Endosc. 2018 Oct;32(10):4310-4313. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6275-0. Epub 2018 Jun 15.
6
Using a Harmonic Scalpel "Drilling and Clamping" Method to Implement Zero Ischemic Robotic-assisted Partial Nephrectomy: An Observation Case Report Study.使用谐波手术刀“钻孔与钳夹”法实施零缺血机器人辅助部分肾切除术:一项观察性病例报告研究
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Jan;95(3):e2349. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000002349.
7
A cost evaluation methodology for surgical technologies.一种手术技术的成本评估方法。
Surg Endosc. 2015 Aug;29(8):2423-32. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3929-4. Epub 2014 Oct 16.
8
Reducing the Cost of Laparoscopy: Reusable versus Disposable Laparoscopic Instruments.降低腹腔镜检查成本:可重复使用与一次性使用的腹腔镜器械
Minim Invasive Surg. 2014;2014:408171. doi: 10.1155/2014/408171. Epub 2014 Jul 22.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2003 Jan-Jun;Suppl Web Exclusives:W3-219-26. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.w3.219.
4
How safe is high-power ultrasonic dissection?高功率超声解剖的安全性如何?
Ann Surg. 2003 Feb;237(2):186-91. doi: 10.1097/01.SLA.0000048454.11276.62.
5
Laparoscopic lymph node dissection using ultrasonically activated shears: comparison with electrosurgery.使用超声激活剪刀进行腹腔镜淋巴结清扫术:与电外科手术的比较。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2002 Jun;12(3):175-80. doi: 10.1089/10926420260188065.
6
Laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass: a randomized study of outcomes, quality of life, and costs.腹腔镜与开腹胃旁路手术:一项关于结局、生活质量和成本的随机研究。
Ann Surg. 2001 Sep;234(3):279-89; discussion 289-91. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200109000-00002.
7
Bariatric surgery. Surgery for weight control in patients with morbid obesity.减肥手术。用于治疗病态肥胖患者以控制体重的手术。
Med Clin North Am. 2000 Mar;84(2):477-89. doi: 10.1016/s0025-7125(05)70232-7.
8
Methods for Voluntary Weight Loss and Control.自愿减肥与体重控制方法
Obes Surg. 1992 Aug;2(3):275-276. doi: 10.1381/096089292765560187.
9
Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass, Roux-en-Y: Preliminary Report of Five Cases.腹腔镜胃旁路术,Roux-en-Y 式:5 例初步报告。
Obes Surg. 1994 Nov;4(4):353-357. doi: 10.1381/096089294765558331.
10
Disposable versus reusable biopsy forceps: a prospective cost evaluation.一次性活检钳与可重复使用活检钳:一项前瞻性成本评估。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2000 Mar;51(3):262-5. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(00)70352-x.