• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

了解并量化无菌医疗器械的环境影响:一次性使用电外科手术刀及其可重复使用替代品的碳足迹研究。

Understanding and quantifying the environmental impact of sterile medical devices: a carbon footprint study of single-use electrosurgical scalpels and their reusable alternatives.

作者信息

Goubil Annabel, Lefèvre Kimberley, Couret Chloé, Ferlita Mireille, Feldman David, Clouet Johann, Rochais Elise

机构信息

Pharmacie, Nantes Université, CHU Nantes, Nantes, F44000, France.

Ophtalmology, Nantes Université, CHU Nantes, Nantes, F44000, France.

出版信息

BMJ Surg Interv Health Technol. 2025 Jul 3;7(1):e000348. doi: 10.1136/bmjsit-2024-000348. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1136/bmjsit-2024-000348
PMID:40621111
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12226936/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In France, 25% of healthcare emissions are attributed to the supply of medical devices, underscoring the necessity for the development of more sustainable procurement policies. However, comparing the carbon footprint of different devices, especially single-use devices versus reusable ones, presents challenges.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the carbon footprint of single-use and reusable electrosurgical scalpels over 1 year of use in our hospital setting.

DESIGN

A cradle-to-grave analysis was conducted from May 1, 2022, to April 30, 2023.

SETTING

Nantes University Hospital, France.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The study quantifies carbon emissions across all life cycle stages: raw material extraction, manufacturing, transportation, use, maintenance, and disposal. For reusable devices, sterilization emissions were allocated based on the total annual workload of the Central Sterile Services Department. Carbon footprint values were derived from direct measurements, manufacturer and supplier data, and literature, with conversions using a public and national database (Base Empreinte, ADEME).

RESULTS

The carbon footprint of single-use devices was estimated at 4291 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent (COe), with 94% attributed to the production of the device itself. The carbon footprint related to the reusable device was estimated at 494 kg COe, with 86% stemming from handling at our sterilization unit.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings are contingent on our hospital's practices and may vary based on several factors. Beyond estimating these carbon footprints, it provides a practical, decision-oriented analysis accessible for hospital leadership and healthcare professionals, supporting institutional change.

摘要

背景

在法国,25%的医疗保健排放归因于医疗设备的供应,这凸显了制定更具可持续性采购政策的必要性。然而,比较不同设备的碳足迹,尤其是一次性设备与可重复使用设备的碳足迹,存在挑战。

目的

评估一次性和可重复使用的电外科手术刀在我院使用1年期间的碳足迹。

设计

于2022年5月1日至2023年4月30日进行了从摇篮到坟墓的分析。

地点

法国南特大学医院。

主要观察指标

该研究对所有生命周期阶段的碳排放进行了量化:原材料提取、制造、运输、使用、维护和处置。对于可重复使用的设备,根据中央消毒供应部门的年度总工作量分配消毒排放。碳足迹值来自直接测量、制造商和供应商数据以及文献,并使用公共和国家数据库(Base Empreinte,法国环境与能源管理署)进行换算。

结果

一次性设备的碳足迹估计为4291千克二氧化碳当量(COe),其中94%归因于设备本身的生产。与可重复使用设备相关的碳足迹估计为494千克COe,其中86%源于我们消毒部门的处理。

结论

这些发现取决于我们医院的做法,可能会因多种因素而有所不同。除了估计这些碳足迹外,它还为医院领导和医疗保健专业人员提供了一种实用的、以决策为导向的分析,支持机构变革。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ee5/12226936/d2241dc23bea/bmjsit-7-1-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ee5/12226936/d2241dc23bea/bmjsit-7-1-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ee5/12226936/d2241dc23bea/bmjsit-7-1-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Understanding and quantifying the environmental impact of sterile medical devices: a carbon footprint study of single-use electrosurgical scalpels and their reusable alternatives.了解并量化无菌医疗器械的环境影响:一次性使用电外科手术刀及其可重复使用替代品的碳足迹研究。
BMJ Surg Interv Health Technol. 2025 Jul 3;7(1):e000348. doi: 10.1136/bmjsit-2024-000348. eCollection 2025.
2
How Can the Environmental Impact of Orthopaedic Surgery Be Measured and Reduced? Using Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction as a Test Case.如何衡量和减少骨科手术对环境的影响?以前交叉韧带重建为例进行分析。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jan 1;483(1):7-19. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003242.
3
Precision feeding as a tool to reduce the environmental footprint of pig production systems: a life-cycle assessment.精准饲养作为减少猪生产系统环境足迹的工具:生命周期评估。
J Anim Sci. 2024 Jan 3;102. doi: 10.1093/jas/skae225.
4
A Comparative Carbon Footprint and Cost Analysis of Uterine Manipulators for Hysterectomy.子宫切除术子宫操纵器的碳足迹与成本比较分析
Obstet Gynecol. 2025 May 22;146(1):104-112. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005949.
5
Bioengineered nerve conduits and wraps for peripheral nerve repair of the upper limb.生物工程神经导管和套用于上肢周围神经修复。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Dec 7;12(12):CD012574. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012574.pub2.
6
Is Your Surgical Helmet System Compromising the Sterile Field? A Systematic Review of Contamination Risks and Preventive Measures in Total Joint Arthroplasty.您的手术头盔系统是否会破坏无菌区域?全关节置换术中污染风险与预防措施的系统评价。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Feb 5. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003383.
7
Carbon emission analysis of aortic valve replacement: the environmental footprint of transcatheter vs. surgical procedures.主动脉瓣置换术的碳排放分析:经导管手术与外科手术的环境足迹
Eur Heart J. 2025 Jul 2. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf379.
8
Community and hospital-based healthcare professionals perceptions of digital advance care planning for palliative and end-of-life care: a latent class analysis.社区和医院的医疗保健专业人员对姑息治疗和临终关怀的数字预立医疗计划的看法:一项潜在类别分析。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun 25:1-22. doi: 10.3310/XCGE3294.
9
Clearing the air: Assessing inhaler usage and associated greenhouse gas emissions in a health system.净化空气:评估卫生系统中的吸入器使用情况及相关温室气体排放
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2025 Jun 26;82(13):e607-e614. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/zxae384.
10
Interventions to reduce harm from continued tobacco use.减少持续吸烟危害的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 13;10(10):CD005231. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005231.pub3.

本文引用的文献

1
The carbon footprint of total knee replacements.全膝关节置换术的碳足迹。
Aust Health Rev. 2024 Dec;48(6):664-672. doi: 10.1071/AH24154.
2
Reusable versus single-use ICU equipment: what's the environmental footprint?可重复使用与一次性使用的重症监护室设备:对环境的影响有多大?
Intensive Care Med. 2023 Dec;49(12):1523-1525. doi: 10.1007/s00134-023-07256-9. Epub 2023 Nov 14.
3
An integrated environmental, economic, and clinician satisfaction comparison between single-use and reusable flexible bronchoscopes for tracheal intubation.
Br J Anaesth. 2023 Jul;131(1):e4-e7. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2023.03.005. Epub 2023 Apr 12.
4
Environmental impact of single-use and reusable flexible cystoscopes.一次性和可重复使用的软性膀胱镜的环境影响。
BJU Int. 2023 May;131(5):617-622. doi: 10.1111/bju.15949. Epub 2023 Jan 2.
5
Re: The Carbon Footprint of Single-Use Flexible Cystoscopes Compared with Reusable Cystoscopes: Methodological Flaws Led to the Erroneous Conclusion That Single-Use Is "Better".回复:一次性软性膀胱镜与可重复使用膀胱镜的碳足迹比较:方法学缺陷导致了一次性使用“更好”这一错误结论。
J Endourol. 2022 Nov;36(11):1466-1467. doi: 10.1089/end.2022.0482. Epub 2022 Aug 22.
6
Environmental impact of single-use, reusable, and mixed trocar systems used for laparoscopic cholecystectomies.腹腔镜胆囊切除术中单用、复用和混合套管系统的环境影响。
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 15;17(7):e0271601. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271601. eCollection 2022.
7
Environmental and health outcomes of single-use versus reusable duodenoscopes.一次性与可复用十二指肠镜的环境与健康结局。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2022 Dec;96(6):1002-1008. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.06.014. Epub 2022 Jun 17.
8
Cost and Environmental Impact of Disposable Flexible Cystoscopes Compared to Reusable Devices.一次性软性膀胱镜与可重复使用设备相比的成本及环境影响
J Endourol. 2022 Oct;36(10):1317-1321. doi: 10.1089/end.2022.0201. Epub 2022 Jun 29.
9
The Carbon Footprint of Single-Use Flexible Cystoscopes Compared with Reusable Cystoscopes.一次性使用软性膀胱镜与可重复使用膀胱镜的碳足迹比较。
J Endourol. 2022 Nov;36(11):1460-1464. doi: 10.1089/end.2021.0891. Epub 2022 Jun 13.
10
Minimising carbon and financial costs of steam sterilisation and packaging of reusable surgical instruments.尽量降低可重复使用手术器械的蒸汽灭菌和包装的碳足迹和财务成本。
Br J Surg. 2022 Feb 1;109(2):200-210. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znab406.