Herrera-Imbroda Jesús, Carbonel-Aranda Vera, García-Illanes Yaiza, Aguilera-Serrano Carlos, Bordallo-Aragón Antonio, García-Spínola Edgar, Torres-Campos Daniel, Villagrán José María, García-Sanchez Juan Antonio, Mayoral-Cleries Fermín, Guzmán-Parra José
Department of Mental Health, University General Hospital of Málaga, Biomedical Research Institute of Malaga (IBIMA), Málaga, Spain.
University of Málaga, Málaga, Spain.
Psychiatr Q. 2025 Mar;96(1):133-144. doi: 10.1007/s11126-024-10110-w. Epub 2025 Jan 16.
Coercive measures are commonly used in mental health settings despite their negative effects. The subjective experience of coercion varies widely, and its short- and long-term health impacts are not well understood. This study aimed to analyze the association between different types of coercive measures experienced during psychiatric hospitalization, the subjective experience of coercion, and both short- and long-term health outcomes. The study included 111 patients from two mental health units who experienced coercive measures (mechanical restraint, involuntary medication, or both). Perceived coercion was assessed during hospitalization. Short-term outcomes (post-traumatic stress and treatment satisfaction) were evaluated before discharge, while long-term outcomes (functionality improvement, risk of readmission, and suicidal behavior) were assessed at five-year follow-up. Perceived coercion was associated with higher post-traumatic stress (p < 0.001) and lower satisfaction with treatment (p < 0.001) in the short term. In the long term, perceived coercion showed no association with functionality, readmission risk, or suicidal behavior. However, combined coercive measures were linked to lower functionality improvement (p = 0.028) and higher readmission risk (p = 0.028) compared to involuntary medication alone. The findings suggest that efforts to reduce negative subjective experiences associated with coercive measures may improve patient satisfaction and reduce trauma risk during hospitalization. Combined coercive measures may be a risk factor for poorer long-term outcomes and should be carefully considered.
尽管强制手段存在负面影响,但在精神卫生环境中仍普遍使用。强制的主观体验差异很大,其短期和长期对健康的影响尚未得到充分理解。本研究旨在分析精神科住院期间经历的不同类型强制手段、强制的主观体验与短期和长期健康结果之间的关联。该研究纳入了来自两个精神卫生单位的111名经历过强制手段(机械约束、非自愿用药或两者皆有)的患者。在住院期间评估了感知到的强制程度。在出院前评估短期结果(创伤后应激和治疗满意度),而在五年随访时评估长期结果(功能改善、再入院风险和自杀行为)。短期内,感知到的强制与较高的创伤后应激(p < 0.001)和较低的治疗满意度(p < 0.001)相关。从长期来看,感知到的强制与功能、再入院风险或自杀行为无关。然而,与单独使用非自愿用药相比,联合强制手段与较低的功能改善(p = 0.028)和较高的再入院风险(p = 0.028)相关。研究结果表明,努力减少与强制手段相关的负面主观体验可能会提高患者满意度并降低住院期间的创伤风险。联合强制手段可能是长期结果较差的一个风险因素,应予以仔细考虑。