Newland Ashley M, Black Curtis D
Lahey Clinic Medical Center, Burlington, MA 01752, USA.
Ann Pharmacother. 2008 Dec;42(12):1865-70. doi: 10.1345/aph.1L231. Epub 2008 Nov 18.
To evaluate, characterize, compare, and critique trials reporting increased tumor progression in patients with cancer who are receiving erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) that led to Food and Drug Administration (FDA) actions for black box warnings and labeling changes.
Literature was accessed through MEDLINE (1950-August 2008) and PubMed (1975-August 2008) using the search terms recombinant erythropoietin, darbepoetin, epoetin, anemia, neoplasms, and disease progression. Articles cited in MedWatch alerts, Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee meeting briefs, and bibliographies from identified articles were also reviewed.
All studies published in English with data suggesting increased tumor progression or death due to disease progression in patients receiving ESAs were included.
ESAs are approved for treatment of anemia in several different disease states, including chemotherapy-induced anemia. Ten trials investigating off-label use of ESAs in patients with cancer have reported an increased risk of tumor progression and/or treatment-associated death. Two of these trials reported worse overall survival with ESA treatment compared with placebo (28% vs 23% and 21.9% vs 16.4%), while another trial reported shorter time to death with treatment (68 vs 131 days; p = 0.04). Many of these studies had important limitations, including imbalanced groups at baseline and poor design. Moreover, none of these trials was designed to detect a statistically worse outcome with ESAs; thus, absolute conclusions regarding tumor progression cannot be drawn. As a result, better designed trials with safety as the primary outcome are ongoing.
Additional studies are needed and being undertaken to qualify and quantify the possible risk of tumor progression with use of ESAs. Prudent practice dictates that until results of these trials are available, ESAs should be used in accordance with FDA labeling.
评估、描述、比较和评判那些报告了接受促红细胞生成素(ESA)治疗的癌症患者肿瘤进展加快的试验,这些试验导致美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)采取行动发布黑框警告并更改标签。
通过MEDLINE(1950年 - 2008年8月)和PubMed(1975年 - 2008年8月)检索文献,使用的检索词为重组促红细胞生成素、达比泊汀、依泊汀、贫血、肿瘤和疾病进展。还查阅了MedWatch警报中引用的文章、肿瘤药物咨询委员会会议简报以及已识别文章的参考文献。
纳入所有以英文发表的研究,其数据表明接受ESA治疗的患者肿瘤进展加快或因疾病进展导致死亡。
ESA被批准用于治疗多种不同疾病状态下的贫血,包括化疗引起的贫血。十项关于ESA在癌症患者中未按说明书用药的试验报告了肿瘤进展和/或治疗相关死亡风险增加。其中两项试验报告,与安慰剂相比,ESA治疗的总生存期更差(28%对23%以及21.9%对16.4%),而另一项试验报告治疗组的死亡时间更短(68天对131天;p = 0.04)。这些研究中有许多存在重要局限性,包括基线组间不均衡和设计不佳。此外,这些试验均未设计用于检测ESA在统计学上更差的结果;因此,无法得出关于肿瘤进展的绝对结论。结果,正在进行以安全性为主要结果的设计更好的试验。
需要并正在开展更多研究以确定和量化使用ESA可能导致肿瘤进展的风险。谨慎的做法是,在这些试验结果出来之前,应按照FDA标签使用ESA。