Respiratory Oncology Unit (Pulmonology), University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Herestraat 49, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Lung Cancer. 2012 Jun;76(3):478-85. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2011.12.015. Epub 2012 Jan 25.
In anemic patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy, erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) raise hemoglobin levels and reduce transfusion requirements, but ESA-related safety concerns exist. To evaluate ESA benefits and risks in lung cancer, we conducted meta-analyses of data from controlled ESA trials conducted in lung cancer patients. Study-level analyses included controlled ESA trials reporting lung cancer mortality, identified from the 2006 Cochrane ESA report and from a systematic search for studies published through December 2010. Patient-level analyses included data from lung cancer patients receiving chemotherapy in Amgen studies evaluating darbepoetin alfa (DA) vs placebo. Study-level and patient-level analyses examined deaths, progression, and transfusion incidence. Patient-level analyses also examined adverse events (AEs) and fatigue. In a study-level meta-analysis of nine ESA studies of 2342 patients receiving chemotherapy, the ESA odds ratio (OR) was 0.87 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.69-1.09) for mortality; the overall random-effects risk difference (95% CI) for mortality was -0.02 (-0.06, 0.02). The ESA OR (95% CI) for disease progression in five chemotherapy studies reporting progression was 0.84 (0.65-1.09). The ESA odds ratio (95% CI) was 0.34 (0.28-0.41) for transfusion incidence. In a patient-level meta-analysis of four studies evaluating 1009 patients through follow-up, the median survival time was 41 weeks with DA and 38 weeks with placebo. During the combined study and follow-up periods, 80% of placebo-group patients and 74% of DA patients died (mortality hazard ratio [HR] 0.90 [95% CI, 0.78-1.03] for DA); results were similar for small cell lung cancer and non-small cell lung cancer. Overall, 87% of placebo patients and 84% of DA patients progressed or died. Fewer DA patients had transfusions (week 5 through end-of-study, DA 19%, placebo 43%). AEs included thrombotic/embolic events (DA 10.5%, placebo 7.2%), cerebrovascular disorders (DA 3.7%, placebo 4.2%), pulmonary edema (DA 0.4%, placebo 1.0%) and pulmonary embolism (DA 1.8%, placebo 0.6%). These meta-analyses suggest that ESAs reduce transfusions without increasing mortality or disease progression in lung cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy.
在接受骨髓抑制化疗的贫血患者中,红细胞生成刺激剂 (ESAs) 可提高血红蛋白水平并减少输血需求,但 ESA 相关的安全性问题仍然存在。为了评估 ESA 在肺癌中的益处和风险,我们对肺癌患者接受 ESA 试验的控制数据进行了荟萃分析。研究水平分析包括从 2006 年 Cochrane ESA 报告和 2010 年 12 月之前系统搜索发表的研究中确定的肺癌死亡率的 ESA 对照试验报告。患者水平分析包括接受 Amgen 研究的化疗肺癌患者的数据,这些研究评估了达贝泊汀阿尔法(DA)与安慰剂的疗效。研究水平和患者水平分析检查了死亡、进展和输血发生率。患者水平分析还检查了不良事件(AE)和疲劳。在对 9 项 ESA 研究的荟萃分析中,有 2342 名接受化疗的患者接受了 ESA 治疗,死亡率的 ESA 优势比(OR)为 0.87(95%置信区间[CI]0.69-1.09);死亡率的总体随机效应风险差异(95%CI)为-0.02(-0.06,0.02)。在报告进展的 5 项化疗研究中,疾病进展的 ESA OR(95%CI)为 0.84(0.65-1.09)。输血发生率的 ESA 比值比(95%CI)为 0.34(0.28-0.41)。在对 4 项研究的患者水平荟萃分析中,通过随访评估了 1009 名患者,DA 组的中位生存时间为 41 周,安慰剂组为 38 周。在联合研究和随访期间,安慰剂组 80%的患者和 DA 组 74%的患者死亡(DA 的死亡率风险比[HR]0.90[95%CI,0.78-1.03]);小细胞肺癌和非小细胞肺癌的结果相似。总体而言,安慰剂组 87%的患者和 DA 组 84%的患者进展或死亡。使用 DA 的患者输血较少(第 5 周至研究结束时,DA 组 19%,安慰剂组 43%)。AE 包括血栓栓塞事件(DA 组 10.5%,安慰剂组 7.2%)、脑血管疾病(DA 组 3.7%,安慰剂组 4.2%)、肺水肿(DA 组 0.4%,安慰剂组 1.0%)和肺栓塞(DA 组 1.8%,安慰剂组 0.6%)。这些荟萃分析表明,在接受化疗的肺癌患者中,ESA 可减少输血而不增加死亡率或疾病进展。