• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Incidence of and reasons for excluding patients with acute myocardial infarction from thrombolytic therapy.

作者信息

Behar S, Hod H, Barbash G, Kaplinsky E

机构信息

Heart Institute, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel.

出版信息

Isr J Med Sci. 1991 Mar;27(3):121-3.

PMID:1901838
Abstract

The percentage of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) who were eligible for thrombolytic therapy was evaluated prospectively, with analysis of the causes for exclusion, in 857 patients with AMI hospitalized in the Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, in 1988. Thrombolytic therapy was given to 127 patients (14.8%); 99 patients were treated with tissue plasminogen activating factor and 28 patients received streptokinase. Three hundred and sixty patients (42.0%) were rejected because of age (greater than 72 years). Other reasons for exclusion were duration of pain lasting for more than 4 h (28.5%), unknown time of onset of the chest pain (9.7%), absence of ST elevation on admission ECG (8.1%), systemic hypertension (4.4%), and presence of severe congestive heart failure upon admission (10.1%). Restricting thrombolytic therapy only to patients less than 72 years old with chest pain duration of 4 h limits the impact of this treatment on the general welfare of patients with AMI. By raising the age limit and extending the time interval between pain onset and treatment initiation, adding newer indications, and enhancing public awareness for early arrival to hospital, the benefit of thrombolytic therapy may be made available to more patients with AMI.

摘要

相似文献

1
Incidence of and reasons for excluding patients with acute myocardial infarction from thrombolytic therapy.
Isr J Med Sci. 1991 Mar;27(3):121-3.
2
Time to treatment with thrombolytic therapy: determinants and effect on short-term nonfatal outcomes of acute myocardial infarction. Canadian GUSTO Investigators. Global Utilization of Streptokinase and + PA for Occluded Coronary Arteries.接受溶栓治疗的时间:急性心肌梗死短期非致命性结局的决定因素及影响。加拿大GUSTO研究人员。链激酶和组织型纤溶酶原激活剂在冠状动脉闭塞中的全球应用研究。
CMAJ. 1997 Feb 15;156(4):497-505.
3
The effect of preinfarction angina on clinical reperfusion time in patients with acute myocardial infarction receiving successful thrombolytic therapy.梗死前心绞痛对接受成功溶栓治疗的急性心肌梗死患者临床再灌注时间的影响。
Can J Cardiol. 2005 Sep;21(11):915-20.
4
[Thrombolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarct--is it being used to the fullest?].[急性心肌梗死中的溶栓治疗——是否得到了充分应用?]
Rev Port Cardiol. 1996 Dec;15(12):867-76, 863.
5
Age-related trends (1986-1993) in the use of thrombolytic agents in patients with acute myocardial infarction. The Worcester Heart Attack Study.急性心肌梗死患者使用溶栓药物的年龄相关趋势(1986 - 1993年)。伍斯特心脏病发作研究。
Arch Intern Med. 1997 Apr 14;157(7):741-6.
6
Eligibility of patients with acute myocardial infarction for thrombolytic therapy: retrospective cohort study.急性心肌梗死患者接受溶栓治疗的资格:回顾性队列研究。
Croat Med J. 2000 Dec;41(4):401-5.
7
Early reperfusion and late clinical outcomes in patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction randomly assigned to primary percutaneous coronary intervention or streptokinase.随机分配接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗或链激酶治疗的急性心肌梗死患者的早期再灌注及晚期临床结局
Am Heart J. 2003 Dec;146(6):E22. doi: 10.1016/S0002-8703(03)00424-1.
8
[Usefulness and safety of intravenous thrombolytic therapy for elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction: relationship with cardiac rupture].静脉溶栓治疗老年急性心肌梗死患者的有效性和安全性:与心脏破裂的关系
J Cardiol. 1999 Mar;33(3):153-61.
9
Factors influencing the time to thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction. Time to Thrombolysis Substudy of the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction-1.影响急性心肌梗死溶栓时间的因素。心肌梗死国家注册研究-1的溶栓时间子研究。
Arch Intern Med. 1997;157(22):2577-82.
10
Safety and efficacy of thrombolysis with alteplase (50 mg) plus tirofiban versus alteplase (100 mg) alone in acute myocardial infarction: preliminary findings.急性心肌梗死中阿替普酶(50毫克)联合替罗非班溶栓与单独使用阿替普酶(100毫克)溶栓的安全性和有效性:初步研究结果。
Ital Heart J. 2001 Aug;2(8):605-11.