Sistla Sarath Chandra, Sibal Amul Kumar, Ravishankar M
Department of Surgery, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Pondicherry, India.
Pain Pract. 2009 Jan-Feb;9(1):65-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2008.00248.x. Epub 2008 Oct 30.
Although there are many methods for postoperative pain management, implementation may be limited in some settings due to practical or financial constraints. Simple, inexpensive and easily implemented analgesic methods may improve access to effective pain relief.
Fifty patients undergoing truncal vagotomy and gastrojejunostomy for pyloric stenosis secondary to chronic duodenal ulceration were studied in this prospective randomized trial. Subjects were assigned to receive either wound perfusion with 8 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine every 5 hours through a catheter placed subcutaneously or intravenous pethidine 0.2 mg/kg on demand for postoperative pain relief. Postoperative pain scores at rest were measured by visual analog scale and the opioid requirement at 0-12 hours, at 12-24 hours and at 24-36 hours were compared. Changes in respiratory parameters were also compared between the two groups.
Pain scores at 0-12 hours were significantly lower in the wound perfusion group compared with the intravenous pethidine group (5.7 +/- 1.3 vs. 4.3 +/- 1.2, mean +/- SD; P < 0.001). The number of doses of analgesic required in the wound perfusion group was significantly lower compared with the controls during the 36 hours of study (3.5 +/- 1.3 vs. 1.4 +/- 1.0, P < 0.001). There were no differences in respiratory parameters, vital capacity, forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), and peak expiratory flow rate between the two groups. The FEV1:FVC ratio, however, was significantly higher in the intravenous pethidine group. There were no wound complications due to catheter placement or systemic toxicity due to the anesthetic.
Intermittent wound perfusion with 0.25% bupivacaine is a safe and efficient method to reduce pain scores and opioid requirement in the early postoperative period. Wound perfusion, however, had no beneficial effect on the postoperative respiratory function.
尽管术后疼痛管理有多种方法,但由于实际或经济限制,在某些情况下实施可能会受到限制。简单、廉价且易于实施的镇痛方法可能会改善有效缓解疼痛的可及性。
在这项前瞻性随机试验中,研究了50例因慢性十二指肠溃疡继发幽门狭窄而接受经腹迷走神经切断术和胃空肠吻合术的患者。受试者被分配接受以下两种方式之一:通过皮下放置的导管每5小时用8毫升0.25%布比卡因进行伤口灌注,或根据术后疼痛缓解需要静脉注射哌替啶0.2毫克/千克。通过视觉模拟量表测量静息时的术后疼痛评分,并比较0至12小时、12至24小时和24至36小时的阿片类药物需求量。还比较了两组之间呼吸参数的变化。
伤口灌注组0至12小时的疼痛评分显著低于静脉注射哌替啶组(5.7±1.3对4.3±1.2,平均值±标准差;P<0.001)。在研究的36小时内,伤口灌注组所需的镇痛药物剂量显著低于对照组(3.5±1.3对1.4±1.0,P<0.001)。两组之间的呼吸参数、肺活量、用力肺活量(FVC)、1秒用力呼气量(FEV1)和呼气峰值流速没有差异。然而,静脉注射哌替啶组的FEV1:FVC比值显著更高。没有因导管放置导致的伤口并发症或因麻醉剂引起的全身毒性。
用0.25%布比卡因进行间歇性伤口灌注是一种安全有效的方法,可降低术后早期的疼痛评分和阿片类药物需求量。然而,伤口灌注对术后呼吸功能没有有益影响。