Berger Ariel, Sadosky Alesia, Dukes Ellen, Edelsberg John, Oster Gerry
Policy Analysis Inc. (PAI), Brookline, Massachusetts 02445, USA.
Pain Pract. 2009 Jan-Feb;9(1):18-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2008.00226.x. Epub 2008 Oct 30.
To examine the use of pregabalin in patients with painful neuropathic disorders under the care of general practitioners (GPs) in the U.K.
Using a large U.K. database of GP encounters, we identified all persons aged > or = 18 years with at least one GP encounter with a diagnosis of a painful neuropathic disorder (eg, postherpetic neuralgia, diabetic peripheral neuropathy) between January 1, 2004 and July 31, 2006. Among these patients, we then identified those who initiated therapy with pregabalin; the date of initial receipt of pregabalin was designated the "index date." We then examined use of pregabalin over the 6-month period following this date ("follow-up"), as well as changes in the use of other pain-related medications (eg, opioids, tricyclic antidepressants [TCAs], other antiepileptics [AEDs]) between the 6-month period preceding the index date ("pretreatment") and follow-up. Patients with less than 6 months of pretreatment and follow-up data were excluded, as were those without any encounters during pretreatment for a painful neuropathic disorder.
A total of 1,400 patients (1.4% of all identified patients with painful neuropathic disorders) initiated therapy with pregabalin and met all other entry criteria; mean age was 62 years, and 58% were women. During pretreatment, most (54%) patients received three or more different types of pain-related medications. During follow-up, patients averaged four prescriptions for pregabalin, totaling 93 therapy days. Compared with pretreatment, fewer patients received other pain-related medications during follow-up, including TCAs (37% during pretreatment vs. 27% during follow-up), opioids (64% vs. 55%), and AEDs other than pregabalin (36% vs. 16%) (all P < 0.01).
In the U.K., many patients prescribed pregabalin by their GPs may have been refractory to other pain-related medications. Use of these medications declined following initiation of pregabalin therapy.
研究在英国,全科医生(GP)诊疗下的疼痛性神经病变患者使用普瑞巴林的情况。
利用英国一个大型全科医生诊疗数据库,我们确定了所有年龄≥18岁、在2004年1月1日至2006年7月31日期间至少有一次全科医生诊疗且诊断为疼痛性神经病变(如带状疱疹后神经痛、糖尿病性周围神经病变)的患者。在这些患者中,我们随后确定了开始使用普瑞巴林治疗的患者;首次接受普瑞巴林治疗的日期被指定为“索引日期”。然后我们检查了在此日期之后的6个月期间(“随访”)普瑞巴林的使用情况,以及在索引日期之前的6个月期间(“预处理”)和随访期间其他与疼痛相关药物(如阿片类药物、三环类抗抑郁药[TCAs]、其他抗癫痫药[AEDs])使用情况的变化。预处理和随访数据少于6个月的患者以及在预处理期间没有任何疼痛性神经病变诊疗记录的患者被排除。
共有1400名患者(占所有确诊的疼痛性神经病变患者的1.4%)开始使用普瑞巴林治疗并符合所有其他入选标准;平均年龄为62岁,58%为女性。在预处理期间,大多数(54%)患者接受了三种或更多不同类型的与疼痛相关的药物。在随访期间,患者平均开具了四张普瑞巴林处方,总计93个治疗日。与预处理相比,随访期间接受其他与疼痛相关药物治疗的患者减少,包括三环类抗抑郁药(预处理期间为37%,随访期间为27%)、阿片类药物(64%对55%)和除普瑞巴林之外的抗癫痫药(36%对16%)(所有P<0.01)。
在英国,许多由全科医生开具普瑞巴林处方的患者可能对其他与疼痛相关的药物治疗无效。开始普瑞巴林治疗后,这些药物的使用量下降。