Schaffer Andrea L, Busingye Doreen, Chidwick Kendal, Brett Jonathan, Blogg Suzanne
Centre for Big Data Research in Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
NPS Medicinewise, Strawberry Hills, New South Wales, Australia.
BJGP Open. 2021 Feb 23;5(1). doi: 10.3399/bjgpopen20X101120. Print 2021 Jan.
In 2013 pregabalin was subsidised by Australia's Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) for neuropathic pain. Since the subsidy, pregabalin prescribing has been increasing in Australia and so has related harm. There are concerns it is being prescribed for indications other than neuropathic pain, which have little evidence of efficacy.
To describe pregabalin prescribing in Australian general practice.
DESIGN & SETTING: A cross-sectional study of patients attending 445 general practice sites in the national MedicineInsight database from March 2012-February 2018.
The following aspects were calculated: the proportion of prescriptions that were for pregabalin per year; the prevalence of pain conditions in patients prescribed pregabalin; and same-day prescribing of pregabalin with opioids or benzodiazepines.
Prescribing increased from 13 per 10 000 to 104 per 10 000 prescriptions between 2012-2013 and 2017-2018. A total of 1 891 623 patients were identified of whom 114 123 (6.0%) were prescribed pregabalin; 49.7% ( = 56 772) had a recorded diagnosis of neuropathic pain. Among people prescribed pregabalin without a recorded diagnosis of neuropathic pain, 43.5% ( = 24 927) had a diagnosis of back problems, 8.8% ( = 5073) chronic pain, and 26.4% ( = 30 146) had no pain diagnosis. Pregabalin was prescribed the same day as an opioid to 38.1% of patients (95% confidence interval [CI] = 37.1% to 39.1%) and a benzodiazepine to 13.1% of patients (95% CI = 12.5% to 13.7%). Patients with a diagnosis of chronic pain had the highest rate of same-day prescribing of pregabalin with an opioid (70.4%, 95% CI = 68.9% to 71.9%) or a benzodiazepine (25.8%, 95% CI = 24.2% to 27.4%) CONCLUSION: Substantial increases in pregabalin prescribing were identified in Australian general practice, but only half of patients had a neuropathic pain diagnosis recorded, the only approved indication for subsidy. High rates of same-day prescribing with opioids and benzodiazepines may put patients at increased risk of harm.
2013年,澳大利亚药品福利计划(PBS)对用于治疗神经性疼痛的普瑞巴林提供补贴。自补贴实施以来,澳大利亚普瑞巴林的处方量一直在增加,相关危害也在增加。有人担心它被用于治疗神经性疼痛以外的适应症,而这些适应症几乎没有疗效证据。
描述澳大利亚全科医疗中普瑞巴林的处方情况。
一项横断面研究,研究对象为2012年3月至2018年2月期间在国家医学洞察数据库中445个全科医疗点就诊的患者。
计算以下几个方面:每年普瑞巴林处方的比例;开具普瑞巴林处方患者的疼痛状况患病率;普瑞巴林与阿片类药物或苯二氮卓类药物的同日处方情况。
2012 - 2013年至2017 - 2018年期间,每10000张处方中普瑞巴林的处方量从13张增加到104张。共识别出1891623名患者,其中114123名(6.0%)开具了普瑞巴林处方;49.7%(n = 56772)有记录诊断为神经性疼痛。在开具普瑞巴林处方但无记录诊断为神经性疼痛的患者中,43.5%(n = 24927)诊断为背部问题,8.8%(n = 5073)为慢性疼痛,26.4%(n = 30146)无疼痛诊断。38.1%的患者普瑞巴林与阿片类药物同日处方(95%置信区间[CI]=37.1%至39.1%),13.1%的患者与苯二氮卓类药物同日处方(95%CI = 12.5%至13.7%)。诊断为慢性疼痛的患者普瑞巴林与阿片类药物同日处方率最高(70.4%,95%CI = 68.9%至71.9%)或与苯二氮卓类药物同日处方率最高(25.8%,95%CI = 24.2%至27.4%)。结论:在澳大利亚全科医疗中,普瑞巴林的处方量大幅增加,但只有一半的患者有记录诊断为神经性疼痛,这是唯一获批的补贴适应症。普瑞巴林与阿片类药物和苯二氮卓类药物的同日处方率较高,可能会使患者面临更大的伤害风险。