Suppr超能文献

急性肾损伤分类与预后之间的相关性。

Correlation between the AKI classification and outcome.

作者信息

Ostermann Marlies, Chang Rene

机构信息

Department of Critical Care, Guy's & St Thomas' Foundation Hospital, Westminster Bridge Road, London SE1 7EH, UK.

出版信息

Crit Care. 2008;12(6):R144. doi: 10.1186/cc7123. Epub 2008 Nov 20.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The Acute Kidney Injury Network proposed a new classification for acute kidney injury (AKI) distinguishing between three stages. We applied the criteria to a large intensive care unit (ICU) population and evaluated the impact of AKI in the context of other risk factors.

METHODS

Using the Riyadh Intensive Care Program database, we applied the AKI classification to 22,303 adult patients admitted to 22 ICUs in the UK and Germany between 1989 and 1999, who stayed in the ICU for 24 hours or longer and did not have end-stage dialysis dependent renal failure.

RESULTS

Of the patients, 7898 (35.4%) fulfilled the criteria for AKI (19.1% had AKI I 3.8% had AKI II and 12.5% had AKI III). Mortality in the ICU was 10.7% in patients with no AKI, 20.1% in AKI I, 25.9% in AKI II and 49.6% in AKI III. Multivariate analysis confirmed that AKI III, but not AKI I and AKI II, were independently associated with ICU mortality (odds ratio (OR) = 2.27). Other independent risk factors for ICU mortality were age (OR = 1.03), sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score on admission to the ICU (OR = 1.11), pre-existing end-stage chronic health (OR = 1.65), emergency surgery (OR = 2.33), mechanical ventilation (OR = 2.83), maximum number of failed organ systems (OR = 2.80) and non-surgical admission (OR = 3.57). Cardiac surgery, AKI I and renal replacement therapy were associated with a reduced risk of dying in the ICU. AKI II was not an independent risk factor for ICU mortality. Without renal replacement therapy as a criterion, 21% of patients classified as AKI III would have been classified as AKI II or AKI I. Renal replacement therapy as a criterion for AKI III may inadvertently diminish the predictive power of the classification.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed AKI classification correlated with ICU outcome but only AKI III was an independent risk factor for ICU mortality. The use of renal replacement therapy as a criterion for AKI III may have a confounding effect on the predictive power of the classification system as a whole.

摘要

引言

急性肾损伤网络提出了一种新的急性肾损伤(AKI)分类方法,区分三个阶段。我们将该标准应用于大量重症监护病房(ICU)患者群体,并在其他风险因素背景下评估了AKI的影响。

方法

利用利雅得重症监护项目数据库,我们将AKI分类应用于1989年至1999年间入住英国和德国22个ICU的22303例成年患者,这些患者在ICU停留24小时或更长时间,且没有终末期依赖透析的肾衰竭。

结果

患者中,7898例(35.4%)符合AKI标准(19.1%为AKI I,3.8%为AKI II,12.5%为AKI III)。无AKI患者的ICU死亡率为10.7%,AKI I为20.1%,AKI II为25.9%。多因素分析证实,AKI III而非AKI I和AKI II与ICU死亡率独立相关(比值比(OR)=2.27)。ICU死亡率的其他独立风险因素包括年龄(OR = 1.03)、入住ICU时的序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分(OR = 1.11)、既往终末期慢性健康状况(OR = 1.65)、急诊手术(OR = 2.33)、机械通气(OR = 2.83)、衰竭器官系统的最大数量(OR = 2.80)和非手术入院(OR = 3.57)。心脏手术、AKI I和肾脏替代治疗与ICU死亡风险降低相关。AKI II不是ICU死亡率的独立风险因素。若不以肾脏替代治疗作为标准,21%被分类为AKI III的患者会被分类为AKI II或AKI I。将肾脏替代治疗作为AKI III的标准可能会无意中降低该分类的预测能力。

结论

所提出的AKI分类与ICU结局相关,但只有AKI III是ICU死亡率的独立风险因素。将肾脏替代治疗作为AKI III的标准可能会对整个分类系统的预测能力产生混杂影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a828/2646305/a1feb7c25849/cc7123-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验