Mashour George A, Kheterpal Sachin, Vanaharam Vishnu, Shanks Amy, Wang Luke Y-J, Sandberg Warren S, Tremper Kevin K
Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Anesth Analg. 2008 Dec;107(6):1919-23. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31818a9946.
The modified Mallampati (MMP) classification is a standard method of oropharyngeal evaluation for predicting difficult laryngoscopy. Previous studies have demonstrated that the predictive value of the MMP is improved when the patient's craniocervical junction is extended rather than neutral (Extended Mallampati Score, EMS). In the present study, we compared the predictive value of the MMP and EMS in the morbidly obese.
We performed a prospective study of adult patients with a Body Mass Index (BMI) > or = 40 over a 12-mo period comparing the MMP and EMS. The performance of the MMP, EMS, and other commonly used tests was compared for the ability to predict difficult laryngoscopy, defined as a Cormack-Lehane grade of 3 or 4. Positioning and direct laryngoscopic techniques were not standardized. The incidence of difficult laryngoscopy and difficult intubation was compared in patients with BMI > or = or < 40.
Three-hundred-forty-six patients with a BMI > or = 40 were evaluated with both the MMP and EMS and received direct laryngoscopy. On average, craniocervical extension decreased the MMP class (P < 0.0001). Compared to the MMP, the EMS improved specificity and predictive value while maintaining sensitivity. Compared to the MMP and other tests, an EMS class of 3 or 4 and a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus were the only statistically significant predictors of difficult laryngoscopy in the morbidly obese. There was no difference in the incidence of difficult laryngoscopy or intubation in the morbidly obese compared to patients with a BMI < 40.
The EMS was superior to the MMP in the prediction of difficult laryngoscopy in the morbidly obese population. A diagnosis of diabetes mellitus also warrants further investigation as a predictor of difficult laryngoscopy in this population. Finally, this study supports previous findings that morbid obesity is not itself a predictor of difficult laryngoscopy or intubation.
改良马兰帕蒂(MMP)分类法是预测困难喉镜检查的口咽评估标准方法。先前的研究表明,当患者颅颈交界处伸展而非处于中立位时(伸展马兰帕蒂评分,EMS),MMP的预测价值会提高。在本研究中,我们比较了MMP和EMS在病态肥胖患者中的预测价值。
我们对体重指数(BMI)≥40的成年患者进行了为期12个月的前瞻性研究,比较MMP和EMS。比较MMP、EMS及其他常用检查预测困难喉镜检查(定义为科马克-莱汉内分级为3级或4级)的能力。定位和直接喉镜检查技术未标准化。比较BMI≥40和BMI<40患者的困难喉镜检查和困难插管发生率。
对346例BMI≥40的患者进行了MMP和EMS评估并接受了直接喉镜检查。平均而言,颅颈伸展降低了MMP分级(P<0.0001)。与MMP相比,EMS提高了特异性和预测价值,同时保持了敏感性。与MMP及其他检查相比,EMS分级为3级或4级和糖尿病诊断是病态肥胖患者困难喉镜检查仅有的具有统计学意义的预测因素。与BMI<40的患者相比,病态肥胖患者的困难喉镜检查或插管发生率无差异。
在病态肥胖人群中,EMS在预测困难喉镜检查方面优于MMP。糖尿病诊断作为该人群困难喉镜检查的预测因素也值得进一步研究。最后,本研究支持先前的发现,即病态肥胖本身并非困难喉镜检查或插管的预测因素。