Wiese Christoph Hr, Wilke Henryk, Bahr Jan, Graf Bernhard M
Department of Anaesthesiology, Emergency and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Centre Göttingen, Germany.
BMC Emerg Med. 2008 Nov 20;8:14. doi: 10.1186/1471-227X-8-14.
In an out-of-hospital emergency situation bystander intervention is essential for a sufficient functioning of the chain of rescue. The basic measures of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (Basic Life Support - BLS) by lay people are therefore definitely part of an effective emergency service of a patient needing resuscitation. Relevant knowledge is provided to the public by various course conceptions. The learning success concerning a one day first aid course ("LSM" course in Germany) has not been much investigated in the past. We investigated to what extent lay people could perform BLS correctly in a standardised manikin scenario. An aim of this study was to show how course repetitions affected success in performing BLS.
The "LSM course" was carried out in a standardised manner. We tested prospectively 100 participants in two groups (Group 1: Participants with previous attendance of a BLS course; Group 2: Participants with no previous attendance of a BLS course) in their practical abilities in BLS after the course. Success parameter was the correct performance of BLS in accordance with the current ERC guidelines.
Twenty-two (22%) of the 100 investigated participants obtained satisfactory results in the practical performance of BLS. Participants with repeated participation in BLS obtained significantly better results (Group 1: 32.7% vs. Group 2: 10.4%; p < 0.01) than course participants with no relevant previous knowledge.
Only 22% of the investigated participants at the end of a "LSM course" were able to perform BLS satisfactorily according to the ERC guidelines. Participants who had previously attended comparable courses obtained significantly better results in the practical test. Through regular repetitions it seems to be possible to achieve, at least on the manikin, an improvement of the results in bystander resuscitation and, consequently, a better patient outcome. To validate this hypothesis further investigations are recommended by specialised societies.
在院外紧急情况下,旁观者干预对于救援链的充分运作至关重要。因此,非专业人员进行心肺复苏的基本措施(基础生命支持 - BLS)无疑是需要复苏患者有效急救服务的一部分。各种课程理念向公众提供相关知识。过去,关于一天急救课程(德国的“LSM课程”)的学习成效研究不多。我们调查了非专业人员在标准化模拟人场景中正确进行BLS的程度。本研究的一个目的是展示课程重复对BLS操作成功率的影响。
“LSM课程”以标准化方式开展。我们前瞻性地测试了两组共100名参与者(第1组:曾参加过BLS课程的参与者;第2组:未曾参加过BLS课程的参与者)在课程结束后进行BLS的实践能力。成功参数是根据当前欧洲复苏委员会(ERC)指南正确进行BLS操作。
在100名被调查参与者中,有22名(22%)在BLS实践操作中取得了满意结果。多次参加BLS课程的参与者取得的结果明显更好(第1组:32.7%对第2组:10.4%;p < 0.01),优于之前没有相关知识的课程参与者。
在“LSM课程”结束时,只有22%的被调查参与者能够根据ERC指南令人满意地进行BLS操作。之前参加过类似课程的参与者在实践测试中取得了明显更好的结果。通过定期重复,似乎有可能至少在模拟人上提高旁观者复苏的效果,从而改善患者预后。为验证这一假设,建议专业学会进行进一步研究。