Suppr超能文献

高危患者胸骨裂开和感染的预防:一项前瞻性随机多中心试验。

Prevention of sternal dehiscence and infection in high-risk patients: a prospective randomized multicenter trial.

作者信息

Schimmer Christoph, Reents Wilko, Berneder Silvia, Eigel Peter, Sezer Oemer, Scheld Hans, Sahraoui Kerim, Gansera Brigitte, Deppert Oliver, Rubio Alvaro, Feyrer Richard, Sauer Cathrin, Elert Olaf, Leyh Rainer

机构信息

Universitätsklinik Würzburg, Klinik für Thorax-, Herz- und Thorakale Gefäbchirurgie, Würzburg, Germany.

出版信息

Ann Thorac Surg. 2008 Dec;86(6):1897-904. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.08.071.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

One factor for the development of sternal wound infection (SWI) is bony instability after sternotomy. This study compares two surgical techniques with respect to the occurrence of SWI in patients with an increased risk.

METHODS

In this multicenter study, 815 consecutive patients with an increased risk for SWI were prospectively randomly assigned to a conventional osteosynthesis (transsternal or peristernal wiring; n = 440) or to an osteosynthesis with additional lateral reinforcement (Robicsek; n = 375). Primary endpoints were the rate of sternal dehiscence as well as the occurrence of superficial sternal wound infections and deep sternal wound infections.

RESULTS

Both groups were comparable concerning preoperative and intraoperative variables. The rate of sternal dehiscence, superficial sternal wound infections, and deep sternal wound infections (conventional technique 2.5%, 3.4%, 2.5%; and Robicsek 3.7%, 5.6%, 3.7%) did not differ between the groups. Logistic regression analysis found independent risk factors for the development of sternal dehiscence: body mass indes greater than 30 kg/m(2) (odds ratio [OR]: 2.9; p = 0.05), New York Heart Association class more than III (OR: 2.4; p = 0.07), impaired renal function (OR: 3.9; p = 0.01), peripheral arterial disease (OR: 3.6; p = 0.001), immunosuppressant state (OR: 3.3; p = 0.001), sternal closure performed by an assistant doctor (OR: 2.5, p = 0.004), postoperative bleeding (OR: 4.2; p = 0.03), transfusion of more than 5 red blood units (OR: 3.7, p = 0.01), reexploration for bleeding (OR: 6.9, p = 0.001), and postoperative delirium (OR: 3.5, p = 0.01). There was an inverse relation between the numbers of wires and DSWI in patients with conventional sternal closure (p = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with an increased risk for sternal instability and wound infection after cardiac surgery, sternal reinforcement according to the technique described by Robicsek did not reduce this complication.

摘要

背景

胸骨切开术后发生胸骨伤口感染(SWI)的一个因素是胸骨不稳定。本研究比较了两种手术技术在高危患者中SWI的发生率。

方法

在这项多中心研究中,815例连续的SWI高危患者被前瞻性随机分配至传统骨固定术组(经胸骨或胸骨周围钢丝固定;n = 440)或附加外侧加强的骨固定术组(罗比克塞克术;n = 375)。主要终点是胸骨裂开率以及表浅胸骨伤口感染和深部胸骨伤口感染的发生率。

结果

两组在术前和术中变量方面具有可比性。两组之间的胸骨裂开率、表浅胸骨伤口感染率和深部胸骨伤口感染率(传统技术分别为2.5%、3.4%、2.5%;罗比克塞克术分别为3.7%、5.6%、3.7%)无差异。逻辑回归分析发现胸骨裂开发生的独立危险因素:体重指数大于30kg/m²(比值比[OR]:2.9;p = 0.05)、纽约心脏协会心功能分级大于III级(OR:2.4;p = 0.07)、肾功能受损(OR:3.9;p = 0.01)、外周动脉疾病(OR:3.6;p = 0.001)、免疫抑制状态(OR:3.3;p = 0.001)、由助理医生进行胸骨闭合(OR:2.5,p = 0.004)、术后出血(OR:4.2;p = 0.03)、输注超过5个单位红细胞(OR:3.7,p = 0.01)、因出血再次探查(OR:6.9,p = 0.001)以及术后谵妄(OR:3.5,p = 0.01)。在采用传统胸骨闭合的患者中,钢丝数量与深部胸骨伤口感染之间存在负相关(p = 0.008)。

结论

在心脏手术后有胸骨不稳定和伤口感染高风险的患者中,采用罗比克塞克描述的技术进行胸骨加强并不能降低这种并发症的发生率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验