Levine Mark, Crowther Simon
Department of Psychology, Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 Dec;95(6):1429-39. doi: 10.1037/a0012634.
Four experiments explored the interaction of group size, social categorization, and bystander behavior. In Study 1, increasing group size inhibited intervention in a street violence scenario when bystanders were strangers but encouraged intervention when bystanders were friends. Study 2 replicated and extended these findings to social category members. When gender identity was salient, group size encouraged intervention when bystanders and victim shared social category membership. In addition, group size interacted with context-specific norms that both inhibit and encourage helping. Study 3 used physical co-presence and gender identities to examine these social category effects. Increasing group size of women produced greater helping of a female victim, but increasing group size of men did not. Additionally, increasing numbers of out-group bystanders resulted in less intervention from women but more intervention from men. Study 4 replicated these findings with a measure of real-life helping behavior. Taken together, the findings indicate that the bystander effect is not a generic consequence of increasing group size. When bystanders share group-level psychological relationships, group size can encourage as well as inhibit helping.
四项实验探究了群体规模、社会分类和旁观者行为之间的相互作用。在研究1中,当旁观者是陌生人时,群体规模的增加会抑制在街头暴力场景中的干预行为,但当旁观者是朋友时,则会鼓励干预行为。研究2将这些发现复制并扩展到社会类别成员。当性别身份显著时,当旁观者和受害者属于同一社会类别成员时,群体规模会鼓励干预行为。此外,群体规模与抑制和鼓励帮助行为的特定情境规范相互作用。研究3利用身体共在和性别身份来检验这些社会类别效应。女性群体规模的增加会对女性受害者提供更多帮助,但男性群体规模的增加则不会。此外,群体外旁观者数量的增加导致女性的干预减少,但男性的干预增加。研究4用现实生活中的帮助行为测量方法复制了这些发现。综合来看,研究结果表明旁观者效应并非群体规模增加的普遍结果。当旁观者共享群体层面的心理关系时,群体规模既可以鼓励也可以抑制帮助行为。