• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Imagined and extended contact experiences and adolescent bystanders' behavioral intentions in homophobic bullying episodes.想象中的和延伸的接触经历与青少年旁观者在恐同欺凌事件中的行为意图。
Aggress Behav. 2023 Mar;49(2):110-126. doi: 10.1002/ab.22059. Epub 2022 Nov 4.
2
Bystanders' responses to offline bullying and cyberbullying: The role of empathy and normative beliefs about aggression.旁观者对线下欺凌和网络欺凌的反应:同理心和关于攻击行为的规范信念的作用。
Scand J Psychol. 2016 Apr;57(2):169-76. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12277.
3
Getting angry matters: Going beyond perspective taking and empathic concern to understand bystanders' behavior in bullying.愤怒很重要:超越观点采择和共情关注以理解旁观者在欺凌行为中的表现。
J Adolesc. 2017 Dec;61:87-95. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2017.09.011. Epub 2017 Sep 30.
4
Me and Others Around: The Roles of Personal and Social Norms in Chinese Adolescent Bystanders' Responses Toward Cyberbullying.我和周围的人:个人和社会规范在中国青少年旁观者对网络欺凌反应中的作用。
J Interpers Violence. 2022 May;37(9-10):NP6329-NP6354. doi: 10.1177/0886260520967128. Epub 2020 Oct 18.
5
Longitudinal associations between features of toxic masculinity and bystander willingness to intervene in bullying among middle school boys.有毒男子气概特征与中学男生在欺凌事件中作为旁观者的干预意愿之间的纵向关联。
J Sch Psychol. 2019 Dec;77:139-151. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2019.10.007. Epub 2019 Nov 26.
6
The effect of victims' responses to overt bullying on same-sex peer bystander reactions.受害者对公然欺凌行为的反应对同性同龄旁观者反应的影响。
J Sch Psychol. 2015 Oct;53(5):375-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2015.07.002. Epub 2015 Aug 27.
7
Bystanders' affect toward bully and victim as predictors of helping and non-helping behaviour.旁观者对欺凌者和受害者的情感态度是预测帮助和不帮助行为的因素。
Scand J Psychol. 2020 Feb;61(1):30-37. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12516. Epub 2019 Jan 28.
8
The Role of Immigration Background, Intergroup Processes, and Social-Cognitive Skills in Bystanders' Responses to Bias-Based Bullying Toward Immigrants During Adolescence.移民背景、群体间过程和社会认知技能在青少年旁观者对针对移民的基于偏见的欺凌行为的反应中的作用。
Child Dev. 2021 May;92(3):e296-e316. doi: 10.1111/cdev.13476. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
9
The role of bystanders in students' perception of bullying and sense of safety.旁观者在学生对欺凌行为的认知及安全感方面所起的作用。
J Sch Psychol. 2008 Dec;46(6):617-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2008.02.001. Epub 2008 Apr 10.
10
Bystanders of ethnic victimization: Do classroom context and teachers' approach matter for how adolescents intend to act?少数民族受害者的旁观者:课堂环境和教师的方法是否会影响青少年的行为意图?
Child Dev. 2022 Sep;93(5):1540-1558. doi: 10.1111/cdev.13822. Epub 2022 Jul 16.

引用本文的文献

1
The SHIELD Framework: Advancing Strength-Based Resilience Strategies to Combat Bullying and Cyberbullying in Youth.SHIELD框架:推进基于优势的复原力策略以应对青少年中的欺凌和网络欺凌
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Jan 7;22(1):66. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22010066.
2
Understanding the situation of bystanders to inform anti-bullying interventions.了解旁观者的情况以指导反欺凌干预措施。
Front Psychol. 2024 Oct 14;15:1116860. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1116860. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Minority- and majority-status bystander reactions to, and reasoning about, intergroup social exclusion.少数群体和多数群体旁观者对群体间社会排斥的反应和推理。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2022 Feb;214:105290. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2021.105290. Epub 2021 Sep 23.
2
Profiles of bystanders' motivation to defend school bully victims from a self-determination perspective.从自我决定论视角看旁观者保护受校园欺凌者的动机特征。
Aggress Behav. 2021 Jan;47(1):78-88. doi: 10.1002/ab.21929. Epub 2020 Aug 30.
3
Defending behavior of peer victimization in school and cyber context during childhood and adolescence: A meta-analytic review of individual and peer-relational characteristics.儿童和青少年时期在学校和网络环境中同伴侵害的防御行为:个体和同伴关系特征的元分析综述。
Psychol Bull. 2019 Sep;145(9):891-928. doi: 10.1037/bul0000205. Epub 2019 Jul 25.
4
The Extended Contact Hypothesis: A Meta-Analysis on 20 Years of Research.扩展接触假说:20 年研究的元分析。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2019 May;23(2):132-160. doi: 10.1177/1088868318762647. Epub 2018 Apr 19.
5
Longitudinal Examination of the Bullying-Sexual Violence Pathway across Early to Late Adolescence: Implicating Homophobic Name-Calling.青少年早期至晚期的欺凌-性暴力途径的纵向研究:同性恋辱骂的暗示作用。
J Youth Adolesc. 2018 Sep;47(9):1880-1893. doi: 10.1007/s10964-018-0827-4. Epub 2018 Mar 2.
6
Studying Positive and Negative Direct and Extended Contact: Complementing Self-Reports With Social Network Analysis.研究直接和扩展的积极与消极接触:用社交网络分析补充自我报告。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2017 Nov;43(11):1566-1581. doi: 10.1177/0146167217719732. Epub 2017 Jul 24.
7
Gender Differences in Empathic Sadness towards Persons of the Same- versus Other-sex during Adolescence.青春期对同性和异性个体共情悲伤的性别差异。
Sex Roles. 2016;75(9):434-446. doi: 10.1007/s11199-016-0649-3. Epub 2016 Jun 27.
8
Bullying and Cyberbullying in Minorities: Are They More Vulnerable than the Majority Group?少数群体中的欺凌和网络欺凌:他们比多数群体更容易受到伤害吗?
Front Psychol. 2016 Oct 18;7:1507. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01507. eCollection 2016.
9
Race-Based Humor and Peer Group Dynamics in Adolescence: Bystander Intervention and Social Exclusion.青少年中基于种族的幽默与同伴群体动态:旁观者干预与社会排斥
Child Dev. 2016 Sep;87(5):1379-91. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12600.
10
Judged by the Company You Keep? Exposure to Nonprejudiced Norms Reduces Concerns About Being Misidentified as Gay/Lesbian.从你所交往的人来评判?接触无偏见规范可减少被误认是同性恋的担忧。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2016 Sep;42(9):1164-76. doi: 10.1177/0146167216652858. Epub 2016 Jun 22.

想象中的和延伸的接触经历与青少年旁观者在恐同欺凌事件中的行为意图。

Imagined and extended contact experiences and adolescent bystanders' behavioral intentions in homophobic bullying episodes.

机构信息

Centro de Investigação e Intervenção Social, Iscte - Instituto Universitário de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.

Applied Psychology Research Center Capabilities and Inclusion (APPsyCI), Ispa- Instituto Universitário, Lisbon, Portugal.

出版信息

Aggress Behav. 2023 Mar;49(2):110-126. doi: 10.1002/ab.22059. Epub 2022 Nov 4.

DOI:10.1002/ab.22059
PMID:36332082
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10099952/
Abstract

Bystanders' helping interventions in bias-based bullying are rare, although they have the potential to intervene on behalf of the victim and quickly stop the aggression. Two studies tested, experimentally, the impact of adolescents' imagined (Study 1, N = 113, M  = 16.17) and extended contact experiences (Study 2, N = 174, M  = 15.79) on assertive bystanders' behavioral intentions in the context of homophobic bullying, an under-researched but highly detrimental behavior that emerges mainly during early adolescence. Potential mediators (empathic concern, social contagion concerns, and masculinity/femininity threat) were also examined. Results showed that female younger participants revealed more behavioral intentions to help victims of homophobic bullying when asked to imagine an interaction with an outgroup member (Study 1). Younger participants revealed less masculinity/femininity threat in the positive extended contact condition, and female participants revealed less empathic concern in the negative extended contact condition (Study 2). Overall, these findings identify specific conditions (e.g., younger females) where indirect contact interventions (i.e., extended and imagined) are likely to have a stronger impact. Age and sex differences were found to illustrate how adolescents vary in their behavioral intentions, empathic concern, and threat; and also highlight the need to further examine age and sex differences regarding responses to homophobic bullying episodes.

摘要

旁观者在基于偏见的欺凌事件中的帮助干预很少见,尽管他们有潜力代表受害者进行干预,并迅速阻止攻击。有两项研究通过实验检验了青少年想象中的(研究 1,N=113,M=16.17)和扩展接触经验(研究 2,N=174,M=15.79)对支持性旁观者在恐同欺凌背景下的果断行为意向的影响,这是一种研究不足但危害极大的行为,主要出现在青春期早期。还研究了潜在的中介因素(同理心关注、社会传染关注和男性/女性气质威胁)。结果表明,当被要求想象与外群体成员互动时,年轻的女参与者对帮助恐同欺凌受害者表现出更多的行为意向(研究 1)。在积极的扩展接触条件下,年轻参与者的男性/女性气质威胁较小,而在消极的扩展接触条件下,女性参与者的同理心关注较少(研究 2)。总体而言,这些发现确定了特定的条件(例如,年轻女性),在这些条件下,间接接触干预(即扩展和想象)可能会产生更强的影响。发现年龄和性别差异说明了青少年在行为意向、同理心关注和威胁方面的差异;并强调需要进一步研究针对恐同欺凌事件的年龄和性别差异的回应。