Aparasu Rajender R, Jano Elda, Johnson Michael L, Chen Hua
Department of Clinical Sciences and Administration, College of Pharmacy, University of Houston, Texas Medical Center, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.
Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2008 Oct;6(4):198-204. doi: 10.1016/j.amjopharm.2008.10.003.
Due to age-related changes in drug disposition and response, elderly patients are more susceptible to the adverse effects of antipsychotic medications than younger adults. However, few studies have examined the impact of typical and atypical antipsychotic use on all-cause hospitalization in the elderly population.
This study compared the short-term effects of incident use of typical and atypical antipsychotic agents on the risk for hospitalization in a community-dwelling elderly population.
This retrospective data analysis involved a longitudinal cohort of typical and atypical antipsychotic users and was based on data from the 1996-2004 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. Typical antipsychotic agents included chlorpromazine, fluphenazine, haloperidol, levomepromazine, loxapine, mesoridazine, molindone, perphenazine, promazine, thioridazine, thiothixene, and trifluoperazine. Atypical antipsychotic agents included aripiprazole, clozapine, olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, and ziprasidone. Incident cases of antipsychotic use in community-dwelling elderly (aged > or =60 years) persons were selected for the assessment of risk for all-cause hospitalization within 60 days of exposure to antipsychotics. Bivariate analyses were used to compare baseline characteristics; multivariate logistic regression was used to compare hospitalization risk among users of typicals and atypicals after controlling for age, sex, race, income, insurance coverage, perceived general health, perceived mental health, and other concurrent psychotropic use.
The analytical sample consisted of 124 community-dwelling elderly patients (atypicals, 75 patients; typicals, 49). A majority of the elderly study sample were women (63%), white (79%), and of middle/high income (57%). The mean (SD) age of the study sample was 74.37 (8.65) years. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between typical and atypical users, with the exception of perceived mental health status. After controlling for other factors, the risk for hospitalization was nearly 4-fold higher with typical antipsychotic use than atypical use (odds ratio, 3.81; 95% CI, 1.12-12.99).
In this population of community-dwelling elderly, use of typical agents was associated with an increased risk for hospitalization compared with atypical agents.
由于药物处置和反应方面与年龄相关的变化,老年患者比年轻成年人更容易受到抗精神病药物不良反应的影响。然而,很少有研究考察典型和非典型抗精神病药物的使用对老年人群全因住院率的影响。
本研究比较了首次使用典型和非典型抗精神病药物对社区居住老年人群住院风险的短期影响。
这项回顾性数据分析涉及典型和非典型抗精神病药物使用者的纵向队列,数据来自1996 - 2004年医疗支出小组调查。典型抗精神病药物包括氯丙嗪、氟奋乃静、氟哌啶醇、左美丙嗪、洛沙平、美索达嗪、吗茚酮、奋乃静、丙嗪、硫利达嗪、替沃噻吨和三氟拉嗪。非典型抗精神病药物包括阿立哌唑、氯氮平、奥氮平、喹硫平、利培酮和齐拉西酮。选择社区居住老年(年龄≥60岁)人群中首次使用抗精神病药物的病例,评估在接触抗精神病药物后60天内的全因住院风险。采用双变量分析比较基线特征;在控制年龄、性别、种族、收入、保险覆盖范围、自我感知的总体健康状况、自我感知的心理健康状况以及其他同时使用的精神药物后,使用多变量逻辑回归比较典型和非典型药物使用者的住院风险。
分析样本包括124名社区居住老年患者(非典型药物使用者75例;典型药物使用者49例)。老年研究样本中大多数为女性(63%)、白人(79%)且收入为中/高收入(57%)。研究样本的平均(标准差)年龄为74.37(8.65)岁。典型和非典型药物使用者的基线特征除自我感知的心理健康状况外无显著差异。在控制其他因素后,使用典型抗精神病药物的住院风险比使用非典型药物高近4倍(比值比,3.81;95%置信区间,1.12 - 12.99)。
在这个社区居住老年人群中,与非典型药物相比,使用典型药物与住院风险增加相关。