Yunusa Ismaeel, Teng Chengwen, Karaye Ibraheem M, Crounse Emily, Alsahali Saud, Maleki Nasim
Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Outcomes Sciences, University of South Carolina College of Pharmacy, Columbia, SC, United States.
Department of Population Health, Hofstra University, Hempstead, NY, United States.
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Jun 6;13:917351. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.917351. eCollection 2022.
Persons with symptoms of psychosis receiving treatment with atypical antipsychotics (AAPs) can experience serious adverse events (AEs) requiring admission to the hospital. The comparative likelihood of AE-related hospitalization following the use of all AAPs has not been fully characterized. Therefore, we evaluated the safety signals of hospitalizations associated with the use of AAPs.
We conducted a cross-sectional analysis using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database (from January 1, 2004, to December 31, 2021) to examine disproportionality in reporting hospitalizations suspected to be associated with 12 AAPs (aripiprazole, asenapine, brexpiprazole, clozapine, iloperidone, lurasidone, olanzapine, paliperidone, and pimavanserin, quetiapine, risperidone, and ziprasidone). Hospitalization in the FAERs database is an outcome that is recorded as a result of an AE occurring at any drug dose. We estimated reporting odds ratios (RORs) by comparing the odds of hospitalization occurring with a particular AAP to the odds of its occurrence with other drugs. In addition, we considered the presence of a significant safety signal when the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) of the ROR is >1.
A total of 204,287 cases of hospitalizations were reported to the FDA for individuals treated with AAPs. There were significant safety signals of hospitalization associated with using clozapine (ROR, 2.88; 95% CI, 2.84-2.92), olanzapine (ROR, 2.61; 95% CI, 2.57-2.64), quetiapine (ROR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.85-1.89), risperidone (ROR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.39-1.43), aripiprazole (ROR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.32-1.35), and ziprasidone (ROR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.10-1.18). However, no hospitalization-related safety signals were observed with the use of paliperidone, pimavanserin, iloperidone, asenapine, lurasidone, and brexpiprazole. The ROR estimates were numerically higher among older adults than younger adults.
This cross-sectional assessment of data from FAERs (2004-2021) suggested that users of clozapine, olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, aripiprazole, and ziprasidone were more likely to report being hospitalized than users of other AAPs. Given that the FAERs database only contains spontaneous reports of AEs experienced by persons exposed to a drug but without information on exposed persons who did not have an event, a cohort study comparing hospitalizations among new users of individual AAPs against each other is needed to delineate these safety signals further.
使用非典型抗精神病药物(AAPs)治疗的精神病症状患者可能会经历需要住院治疗的严重不良事件(AEs)。使用所有AAPs后与不良事件相关的住院治疗的相对可能性尚未得到充分描述。因此,我们评估了与使用AAPs相关的住院治疗的安全信号。
我们使用美国食品药品监督管理局不良事件报告系统(FAERS)数据库(2004年1月1日至2021年12月31日)进行了一项横断面分析,以检查怀疑与12种AAPs(阿立哌唑、阿塞那平、布瑞哌唑、氯氮平、伊潘立酮、鲁拉西酮、奥氮平、帕利哌酮、匹莫范色林、喹硫平、利培酮和齐拉西酮)相关的住院报告中的不成比例情况。FAERS数据库中的住院治疗是因任何药物剂量发生不良事件而记录的结果。我们通过比较使用特定AAPs发生住院治疗的几率与使用其他药物发生住院治疗的几率来估计报告比值比(RORs)。此外,当ROR的95%置信区间(CI)下限>1时,我们认为存在显著的安全信号。
共有204287例使用AAPs治疗的个体的住院治疗报告提交给了美国食品药品监督管理局。与使用氯氮平(ROR,2.88;95%CI,2.84 - 2.92)、奥氮平(ROR,2.61;95%CI,2.57 - 2.64)、喹硫平(ROR,1.87;95%CI,1.85 - 1.89)、利培酮(ROR,1.41;95%CI,1.39 - 1.43)、阿立哌唑(ROR,1.34;95%CI,1.32 - 1.35)和齐拉西酮(ROR,1.14;95%CI,1.10 - 1.18)相关的住院治疗存在显著的安全信号。然而,使用帕利哌酮、匹莫范色林、伊潘立酮、阿塞那平、鲁拉西酮和布瑞哌唑未观察到与住院治疗相关的安全信号。ROR估计值在老年人中在数值上高于年轻人。
这项对FAERS(2004 - 2021年)数据的横断面评估表明,与其他AAPs使用者相比,氯氮平、奥氮平、喹硫平、利培酮、阿立哌唑和齐拉西酮的使用者更有可能报告住院治疗情况。鉴于FAERS数据库仅包含接触药物者经历的不良事件的自发报告,而没有未发生事件的接触者的信息,需要进行一项队列研究,将个体AAPs新使用者之间的住院治疗情况进行比较,以进一步明确这些安全信号。