DNA图谱的稀有性。
THE RARITY OF DNA PROFILES.
作者信息
Weir Bruce S
机构信息
Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA.
出版信息
Ann Appl Stat. 2007;1(2):358-370. doi: 10.1214/07-AOAS128.
Abstract
It is now widely accepted that forensic DNA profiles are rare, so it was a surprise to some people that different people represented in offender databases are being found to have the same profile. In the first place this is just an illustration of the birthday problem, but a deeper analysis must take into account dependencies among profiles caused by family or population membership.
摘要
现在人们普遍认为法医DNA图谱是罕见的，因此，一些人惊讶地发现，犯罪者数据库中不同的人被发现拥有相同的图谱。首先，这只是生日问题的一个例证，但更深入的分析必须考虑到由家庭或群体成员关系导致的图谱之间的相关性。
相似文献
1
THE RARITY OF DNA PROFILES.
Ann Appl Stat. 2007;1(2):358-370. doi: 10.1214/07-AOAS128.
2
Partial matches in heterogeneous offender databases do not call into question the validity of random match probability calculations.
Int J Legal Med. 2009 Jan;123(1):59-63. doi: 10.1007/s00414-008-0239-1. Epub 2008 May 6.
3
The forensic significance of various reference population databases for estimating the rarity of variable number of tandem repeat (VNTR) loci profiles.
EXS. 1993;67:177-91. doi: 10.1007/978-3-0348-8583-6_15.
4
Familial searching: a specialist forensic DNA profiling service utilising the National DNA Database to identify unknown offenders via their relatives--the UK experience.
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2014 Jan;8(1):1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2013.07.004. Epub 2013 Sep 7.
5
The effect of wild card designations and rare alleles in forensic DNA database searches.
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2015 May;16:98-104. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2014.12.003. Epub 2014 Dec 16.
6
Isolation and genetic analysis of pure cells from forensic biological mixtures: The precision of a digital approach.
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2017 Jul;29:225-241. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2017.04.023. Epub 2017 May 1.
7
Recommendations for consistent treatment of length variants in the human mitochondrial DNA control region.
Forensic Sci Int. 2002 Sep 10;129(1):35-42. doi: 10.1016/s0379-0738(02)00206-2.
8
Assessing the Forensic Value of DNA Evidence from Y Chromosomes and Mitogenomes.
Genes (Basel). 2021 Aug 5;12(8):1209. doi: 10.3390/genes12081209.
9
Detection of offender DNA following skin-to-skin contact with a victim.
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2018 Nov;37:252-259. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2018.09.005. Epub 2018 Sep 17.
10
Kinship index variations among populations and thresholds for familial searching.
PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e37474. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037474. Epub 2012 May 16.
引用本文的文献
1
Decreased accuracy of forensic DNA mixture analysis for groups with lower genetic diversity.
iScience. 2024 Sep 28;27(11):111067. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.111067. eCollection 2024 Nov 15.
2
Solving the Arizona search problem by imputation.
iScience. 2024 Jan 12;27(2):108831. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.108831. eCollection 2024 Feb 16.
3
Developmental validation of the HomyGene19+14Y System.
Int J Legal Med. 2017 May;131(3):605-620. doi: 10.1007/s00414-016-1505-2. Epub 2016 Dec 1.
4
Population-specific FST values for forensic STR markers: A worldwide survey.
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2016 Jul;23:91-100. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2016.03.004. Epub 2016 Mar 22.
5
Worldwide F(ST) estimates relative to five continental-scale populations.
Ann Hum Genet. 2014 Nov;78(6):468-77. doi: 10.1111/ahg.12081.
6
Estimating F-statistics: A historical view.
Philos Sci. 2012 Dec;79(5):637-643. doi: 10.1086/667904.
7
On the exact distribution of the numbers of alleles in DNA mixtures.
Int J Legal Med. 2014 May;128(3):427-37. doi: 10.1007/s00414-013-0951-3. Epub 2013 Dec 14.
8
Familial identification: population structure and relationship distinguishability.
PLoS Genet. 2012 Feb;8(2):e1002469. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002469. Epub 2012 Feb 9.
9
Developing criteria and data to determine best options for expanding the core CODIS loci.
Investig Genet. 2012 Jan 6;3:1. doi: 10.1186/2041-2223-3-1.
10
The interpretation of lineage markers in forensic DNA testing.
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2011 Mar;5(2):78-83. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2011.01.010.
本文引用的文献
1
Genetic relatedness analysis: modern data and new challenges.
Nat Rev Genet. 2006 Oct;7(10):771-80. doi: 10.1038/nrg1960.
2
Matching and partially-matching DNA profiles.
J Forensic Sci. 2004 Sep;49(5):1009-14.
3
Testing for kinship in a subdivided population.
Forensic Sci Int. 2003 Aug 12;135(2):105-9. doi: 10.1016/s0379-0738(03)00168-3.
4
When can a DNA profile be regarded as unique?
Sci Justice. 1999 Oct-Dec;39(4):257-60. doi: 10.1016/S1355-0306(99)72057-5.
5
Significant genetic correlations among Caucasians at forensic DNA loci.
Heredity (Edinb). 1997 Jun;78 ( Pt 6):583-9. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1997.97.
6
On identification by probability.
J Forensic Sci Soc. 1986 May-Jun;26(3):197-213. doi: 10.1016/s0015-7368(86)72477-8.
Zotero 插件