Shea Nicholas, Krug Kristine, Tobler Philippe N
University of Oxford, Oxford, England.
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2008 Dec;8(4):418-28. doi: 10.3758/CABN.8.4.418.
Emerging evidence suggests that the long-established distinction between habit-based and goal-directed decision-making mechanisms can also be sustained in humans. Although the habit-based system has been extensively studied in humans, the goal-directed system is less well characterized. This review brings to that task the distinction between conceptual and nonconceptual representational mechanisms. Conceptual representations are structured out of semantic constituents (concepts)--the use of which requires an ability to perform some language-like syntactic processing. Decision making--as investigated by neuroscience and psychology--is normally studied in isolation from questions about concepts as studied in philosophy and cognitive psychology. We ask what role concepts play in the "goal-directed" decision-making system. We argue that one fruitful way of studying this system in humans is to investigate the extent to which it deploys conceptual representations.
新出现的证据表明,长期以来基于习惯和目标导向的决策机制之间的区别在人类中也能得到维持。虽然基于习惯的系统在人类中已经得到了广泛研究,但目标导向系统的特征却不太明确。本综述将概念性和非概念性表征机制之间的区别引入到这项任务中。概念性表征由语义成分(概念)构成,其使用需要具备进行某种类似语言的句法处理的能力。神经科学和心理学所研究的决策通常是与哲学和认知心理学中所研究的概念问题分开进行的。我们要问概念在“目标导向”决策系统中扮演什么角色。我们认为,研究人类这个系统的一个富有成效的方法是探究它在多大程度上运用概念性表征。