Rodrigues-Alves Rodrigo, Lopez Anabela, Pereira-Santos Maria Conceição, Lopes-Silva Susana, Spínola-Santos Amélia, Costa Célia, Branco-Ferreira Manuel, Lidholm Jonas, Pereira-Barbosa Manuel
Serviço de Imunoalergologia, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Norte, Portugal.
Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2009;149(1):65-73. doi: 10.1159/000176308. Epub 2008 Nov 26.
Peach is a common food allergen source throughout Europe. The aim of this study was to characterize peach allergy in a Portuguese patient population.
Thirty peach-allergic patients confirmed by double-blind placebo-controlled food challenges and 29 controls were included. All subjects completed a standardized questionnaire regarding symptoms and epidemiologic characteristics, skin prick tests with inhalant allergens and foods as well as specific IgE antibodies to peach, recombinant peach allergens rPru p 1, rPru p 3, rPru p 4 and cross-reactive carbohydrate determinants.
Thirty-seven percent of patients reported only oral allergy syndrome, while 37% reported generalized urticaria and/or angioedema, 17% localized contact urticaria and 10% anaphylaxis with peach. Sensitization to other Rosaceae fruits and tree nuts was present in 90 and 77% of the patients, respectively. Respiratory allergy history was associated with less severe symptoms (oral allergy syndrome or contact urticaria; p < 0.01) and positive skin prick test to peach peel or plum with more severe symptoms (urticaria and/or angioedema or anaphylaxis; p < 0.05). Ninety-seven percent were sensitized to Pru p 3, 13% to Pru p 4, 3% to Pru p 1 and 10% to cross-reactive carbohydrate determinants. Pru p 3 specific IgE was associated with Artemisia vulgaris sensitization and tree nut allergy (p < 0.05) but not with clinical severity.
Half the patients reported systemic reactions to peach. Peach allergy appeared predominantly mediated by Pru p 3 but some patients were sensitized to Pru p 4. Applying a 0.10 kU(A)/l cutoff level, the diagnostic value of combining the 3 recombinant allergens was noteworthy, with 100% sensitivity and 90% specificity.
桃子是欧洲常见的食物过敏原来源。本研究的目的是对葡萄牙患者群体中的桃子过敏特征进行描述。
纳入了30例经双盲安慰剂对照食物激发试验确诊的桃子过敏患者和29例对照。所有受试者均完成了一份关于症状和流行病学特征的标准化问卷,进行了吸入性过敏原和食物的皮肤点刺试验以及针对桃子、重组桃子过敏原rPru p 1、rPru p 3、rPru p 4和交叉反应性碳水化合物决定簇的特异性IgE抗体检测。
37%的患者仅报告了口腔过敏综合征,37%报告了全身性荨麻疹和/或血管性水肿,17%报告了局限性接触性荨麻疹,10%报告了对桃子的过敏反应。分别有90%和77%的患者对其他蔷薇科水果和坚果过敏。呼吸道过敏史与较轻的症状(口腔过敏综合征或接触性荨麻疹;p < 0.01)相关,而对桃皮或李子的皮肤点刺试验阳性与较重的症状(荨麻疹和/或血管性水肿或过敏反应;p < 0.05)相关。97%的患者对Pru p 3过敏,13%对Pru p 4过敏,3%对Pru p 1过敏,10%对交叉反应性碳水化合物决定簇过敏。Pru p 3特异性IgE与艾蒿过敏和坚果过敏相关(p < 0.05),但与临床严重程度无关。
一半的患者报告了对桃子的全身反应。桃子过敏主要由Pru p 3介导,但一些患者对Pru p 4过敏。采用0.10 kU(A)/l的临界值水平,联合3种重组过敏原的诊断价值显著,敏感性为100%,特异性为90%。