Suppr超能文献

颈动脉狭窄的诊断:50例患者中二维傅里叶变换时间飞跃法磁共振血管造影与对比血管造影的比较

Diagnosis of carotid artery stenosis: comparison of 2DFT time-of-flight MR angiography with contrast angiography in 50 patients.

作者信息

Litt A W, Eidelman E M, Pinto R S, Riles T S, McLachlan S J, Schwartzenberg S, Weinreb J C, Kricheff I I

机构信息

Department of Radiology, New York University Medical Center, NY 10016.

出版信息

AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1991 Jan-Feb;12(1):149-54.

Abstract

Fifty patients underwent 2DFT time-of-flight MR angiography and intraarterial contrast angiography for evaluation of possible carotid atherosclerotic disease. The MR angiography technique employed contiguous axial flow-sensitive (short TR/TE) slices that were reformatted and postprocessed by using a maximum-intensity projection algorithm to provide 16 angiographic views of the carotid arteries. Both studies were independently reviewed by two observers in a blinded manner. Carotid arteries were categorized as normal, mildly stenotic, moderately stenotic, severely stenotic, or occluded. For the 94 carotid arteries available for review, one observer reported a 70% agreement between the two techniques and the second observer reported a 56% agreement (p = .0001). The best correlation was in the severely stenotic category and the worst was in the occluded category. Agreement between observers was 67% for MR angiography and 72% for contrast angiography, which was similar to that between the two techniques. Although not all carotid atherosclerotic disease was visualized equally well, 2DFT time-of-flight MR angiography had a good overall correlation with the "gold standard" of intraarterial contrast angiography, supporting its use as a screening technique. While further improvements are needed, use of MR angiography as the primary diagnostic tool for many patients with suspected carotid stenosis should continue to increase.

摘要

50例患者接受了二维傅里叶变换(2DFT)时间飞跃法磁共振血管造影(MR angiography)和动脉内造影血管造影,以评估可能存在的颈动脉粥样硬化疾病。MR血管造影技术采用连续的轴向血流敏感(短TR/TE)层面,经最大强度投影算法进行重新格式化和后处理,以提供16个颈动脉血管造影视图。两项研究均由两名观察者以盲法独立进行评估。颈动脉被分类为正常、轻度狭窄、中度狭窄、重度狭窄或闭塞。对于可供评估的94条颈动脉,一名观察者报告两种技术之间的一致性为70%,另一名观察者报告的一致性为56%(p = .0001)。相关性最好的是重度狭窄类别,最差的是闭塞类别。观察者之间对于MR血管造影的一致性为67%,对于造影血管造影的一致性为72%,这与两种技术之间的一致性相似。尽管并非所有颈动脉粥样硬化疾病都能同等清晰地显示,但2DFT时间飞跃法MR血管造影与动脉内造影血管造影的“金标准”总体相关性良好,支持将其用作筛查技术。虽然仍需要进一步改进,但将MR血管造影用作许多疑似颈动脉狭窄患者的主要诊断工具的情况应会继续增加。

相似文献

10
Carotid-CNS MR flow imaging.
Magn Reson Med. 1990 May;14(2):308-14. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910140215.

引用本文的文献

1
A proof of concept study for machine learning application to stenosis detection.用于机器学习应用于狭窄检测的概念验证研究。
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2021 Oct;59(10):2085-2114. doi: 10.1007/s11517-021-02424-9. Epub 2021 Aug 28.
4
Imaging of carotid artery disease: from luminology to function?颈动脉疾病的影像学检查:从管腔学走向功能学?
Neuroradiology. 2003 Oct;45(10):671-80. doi: 10.1007/s00234-003-1054-5. Epub 2003 Sep 4.
8
Brain imaging.脑成像。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2000 Jan;21(1):9-18.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验