Litt A W, Eidelman E M, Pinto R S, Riles T S, McLachlan S J, Schwartzenberg S, Weinreb J C, Kricheff I I
Department of Radiology, New York University Medical Center, NY 10016.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1991 Jan-Feb;12(1):149-54.
Fifty patients underwent 2DFT time-of-flight MR angiography and intraarterial contrast angiography for evaluation of possible carotid atherosclerotic disease. The MR angiography technique employed contiguous axial flow-sensitive (short TR/TE) slices that were reformatted and postprocessed by using a maximum-intensity projection algorithm to provide 16 angiographic views of the carotid arteries. Both studies were independently reviewed by two observers in a blinded manner. Carotid arteries were categorized as normal, mildly stenotic, moderately stenotic, severely stenotic, or occluded. For the 94 carotid arteries available for review, one observer reported a 70% agreement between the two techniques and the second observer reported a 56% agreement (p = .0001). The best correlation was in the severely stenotic category and the worst was in the occluded category. Agreement between observers was 67% for MR angiography and 72% for contrast angiography, which was similar to that between the two techniques. Although not all carotid atherosclerotic disease was visualized equally well, 2DFT time-of-flight MR angiography had a good overall correlation with the "gold standard" of intraarterial contrast angiography, supporting its use as a screening technique. While further improvements are needed, use of MR angiography as the primary diagnostic tool for many patients with suspected carotid stenosis should continue to increase.
50例患者接受了二维傅里叶变换(2DFT)时间飞跃法磁共振血管造影(MR angiography)和动脉内造影血管造影,以评估可能存在的颈动脉粥样硬化疾病。MR血管造影技术采用连续的轴向血流敏感(短TR/TE)层面,经最大强度投影算法进行重新格式化和后处理,以提供16个颈动脉血管造影视图。两项研究均由两名观察者以盲法独立进行评估。颈动脉被分类为正常、轻度狭窄、中度狭窄、重度狭窄或闭塞。对于可供评估的94条颈动脉,一名观察者报告两种技术之间的一致性为70%,另一名观察者报告的一致性为56%(p = .0001)。相关性最好的是重度狭窄类别,最差的是闭塞类别。观察者之间对于MR血管造影的一致性为67%,对于造影血管造影的一致性为72%,这与两种技术之间的一致性相似。尽管并非所有颈动脉粥样硬化疾病都能同等清晰地显示,但2DFT时间飞跃法MR血管造影与动脉内造影血管造影的“金标准”总体相关性良好,支持将其用作筛查技术。虽然仍需要进一步改进,但将MR血管造影用作许多疑似颈动脉狭窄患者的主要诊断工具的情况应会继续增加。