• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Diagnosis of carotid artery stenosis: comparison of 2DFT time-of-flight MR angiography with contrast angiography in 50 patients.颈动脉狭窄的诊断:50例患者中二维傅里叶变换时间飞跃法磁共振血管造影与对比血管造影的比较
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1991 Jan-Feb;12(1):149-54.
2
Prospective evaluation of extracranial carotid stenosis: MR angiography with maximum-intensity projections and multiplanar reformation compared with conventional angiography.颅外颈动脉狭窄的前瞻性评估:最大强度投影和多平面重建磁共振血管造影与传统血管造影的比较
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994 Nov;163(5):1205-12. doi: 10.2214/ajr.163.5.7976902.
3
Comparison of MR angiography with contrast angiography for the diagnosis of carotid artery stenosis.磁共振血管造影与对比血管造影在诊断颈动脉狭窄方面的比较。
J Assoc Physicians India. 1995 Feb;43(2):92-5.
4
Extracranial atherosclerotic carotid artery disease: evaluation of non-breath-hold three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography.颅外颈动脉粥样硬化疾病:非屏息三维钆增强磁共振血管造影评估
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998 Feb;170(2):489-95. doi: 10.2214/ajr.170.2.9456971.
5
Prospective evaluation of suspected stenoocclusive disease of the intracranial artery: combined MR angiography and CT angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography.颅内动脉狭窄闭塞性疾病疑似病例的前瞻性评估:磁共振血管造影和CT血管造影联合应用与数字减影血管造影的比较
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2002 Jan;23(1):93-101.
6
Assessment of MR angiography versus arteriography for evaluation of cervical carotid bifurcation disease.磁共振血管造影与动脉造影在评估颈总动脉分叉疾病中的对比研究
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1993 May-Jun;14(3):681-8.
7
Intracranial vascular stenosis and occlusion: diagnostic accuracy of three-dimensional, Fourier transform, time-of-flight MR angiography.颅内血管狭窄与闭塞:三维傅里叶变换时间飞跃磁共振血管造影的诊断准确性
Radiology. 1994 Oct;193(1):187-93. doi: 10.1148/radiology.193.1.8090890.
8
Duplex ultrasonography, digital subtraction angiography, and conventional angiography in assessing carotid atherosclerosis.双功超声检查、数字减影血管造影术及传统血管造影术在评估颈动脉粥样硬化中的应用
Arch Surg. 1984 Jun;119(6):664-9. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1984.01390180032006.
9
Comparison of 2D- and 3DFT multiple overlapping thin-slab acquisition TOF MR angiography in carotid disease.
J Neuroimaging. 1998 Jan;8(1):3-7. doi: 10.1111/jon1998813.
10
Carotid-CNS MR flow imaging.颈动脉-中枢神经系统磁共振血流成像
Magn Reson Med. 1990 May;14(2):308-14. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910140215.

引用本文的文献

1
A proof of concept study for machine learning application to stenosis detection.用于机器学习应用于狭窄检测的概念验证研究。
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2021 Oct;59(10):2085-2114. doi: 10.1007/s11517-021-02424-9. Epub 2021 Aug 28.
2
Angiography of primary central nervous system angiitis of childhood: conventional angiography versus magnetic resonance angiography at presentation.儿童原发性中枢神经系统血管炎的血管造影:发病时传统血管造影与磁共振血管造影的对比
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007 Jan;28(1):9-15.
3
MR imaging and angiography of primary CNS vasculitis of childhood.儿童原发性中枢神经系统血管炎的磁共振成像与血管造影
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006 Jan;27(1):192-9.
4
Imaging of carotid artery disease: from luminology to function?颈动脉疾病的影像学检查:从管腔学走向功能学?
Neuroradiology. 2003 Oct;45(10):671-80. doi: 10.1007/s00234-003-1054-5. Epub 2003 Sep 4.
5
Total occlusion versus hairline residual lumen of the internal carotid arteries: accuracy of single section helical CT angiography.颈内动脉完全闭塞与细线状残余管腔:单层螺旋CT血管造影的准确性
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2003 Jun-Jul;24(6):1123-9.
6
Prospective evaluation of suspected stenoocclusive disease of the intracranial artery: combined MR angiography and CT angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography.颅内动脉狭窄闭塞性疾病疑似病例的前瞻性评估:磁共振血管造影和CT血管造影联合应用与数字减影血管造影的比较
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2002 Jan;23(1):93-101.
7
Use of magnetic resonance angiography to select candidates with recently symptomatic carotid stenosis for surgery: systematic review.利用磁共振血管造影术选择近期有症状的颈动脉狭窄患者进行手术:系统评价
BMJ. 2002 Jan 26;324(7331):198. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7331.198.
8
Brain imaging.脑成像。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2000 Jan;21(1):9-18.
9
Non-invasive diagnosis of traumatic occlusion of extracranial internal carotid artery by magnetic resonance angiography.磁共振血管造影对颅外颈内动脉创伤性闭塞的无创诊断
Neurosurg Rev. 1996;19(4):281-3. doi: 10.1007/BF00314847.
10
Carotid magnetic resonance angiography: improved image quality with dual 3-inch surface coils.颈动脉磁共振血管造影术:使用双3英寸表面线圈提高图像质量。
Neuroradiology. 1996 Jul;38(5):403-8. doi: 10.1007/BF00607262.

颈动脉狭窄的诊断:50例患者中二维傅里叶变换时间飞跃法磁共振血管造影与对比血管造影的比较

Diagnosis of carotid artery stenosis: comparison of 2DFT time-of-flight MR angiography with contrast angiography in 50 patients.

作者信息

Litt A W, Eidelman E M, Pinto R S, Riles T S, McLachlan S J, Schwartzenberg S, Weinreb J C, Kricheff I I

机构信息

Department of Radiology, New York University Medical Center, NY 10016.

出版信息

AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1991 Jan-Feb;12(1):149-54.

PMID:1903574
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8367569/
Abstract

Fifty patients underwent 2DFT time-of-flight MR angiography and intraarterial contrast angiography for evaluation of possible carotid atherosclerotic disease. The MR angiography technique employed contiguous axial flow-sensitive (short TR/TE) slices that were reformatted and postprocessed by using a maximum-intensity projection algorithm to provide 16 angiographic views of the carotid arteries. Both studies were independently reviewed by two observers in a blinded manner. Carotid arteries were categorized as normal, mildly stenotic, moderately stenotic, severely stenotic, or occluded. For the 94 carotid arteries available for review, one observer reported a 70% agreement between the two techniques and the second observer reported a 56% agreement (p = .0001). The best correlation was in the severely stenotic category and the worst was in the occluded category. Agreement between observers was 67% for MR angiography and 72% for contrast angiography, which was similar to that between the two techniques. Although not all carotid atherosclerotic disease was visualized equally well, 2DFT time-of-flight MR angiography had a good overall correlation with the "gold standard" of intraarterial contrast angiography, supporting its use as a screening technique. While further improvements are needed, use of MR angiography as the primary diagnostic tool for many patients with suspected carotid stenosis should continue to increase.

摘要

50例患者接受了二维傅里叶变换(2DFT)时间飞跃法磁共振血管造影(MR angiography)和动脉内造影血管造影,以评估可能存在的颈动脉粥样硬化疾病。MR血管造影技术采用连续的轴向血流敏感(短TR/TE)层面,经最大强度投影算法进行重新格式化和后处理,以提供16个颈动脉血管造影视图。两项研究均由两名观察者以盲法独立进行评估。颈动脉被分类为正常、轻度狭窄、中度狭窄、重度狭窄或闭塞。对于可供评估的94条颈动脉,一名观察者报告两种技术之间的一致性为70%,另一名观察者报告的一致性为56%(p = .0001)。相关性最好的是重度狭窄类别,最差的是闭塞类别。观察者之间对于MR血管造影的一致性为67%,对于造影血管造影的一致性为72%,这与两种技术之间的一致性相似。尽管并非所有颈动脉粥样硬化疾病都能同等清晰地显示,但2DFT时间飞跃法MR血管造影与动脉内造影血管造影的“金标准”总体相关性良好,支持将其用作筛查技术。虽然仍需要进一步改进,但将MR血管造影用作许多疑似颈动脉狭窄患者的主要诊断工具的情况应会继续增加。