• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Assessment of MR angiography versus arteriography for evaluation of cervical carotid bifurcation disease.磁共振血管造影与动脉造影在评估颈总动脉分叉疾病中的对比研究
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1993 May-Jun;14(3):681-8.
2
Three-dimensional (volume) gradient-echo imaging of the carotid bifurcation: preliminary clinical experience.颈动脉分叉处的三维(容积)梯度回波成像:初步临床经验。
Radiology. 1989 Jun;171(3):801-6. doi: 10.1148/radiology.171.3.2717755.
3
Efficacy of screening MR angiography and Doppler ultrasonography in the evaluation of carotid artery stenosis.筛查磁共振血管造影和多普勒超声检查在评估颈动脉狭窄中的效能。
Am Surg. 1994 May;60(5):340-8.
4
Diagnosis of carotid artery disease: preliminary experience with maximum-intensity-projection spiral CT angiography.颈动脉疾病的诊断:最大密度投影螺旋CT血管造影术的初步经验
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1993 Jun;160(6):1267-71. doi: 10.2214/ajr.160.6.8498231.
5
Prospective evaluation of extracranial carotid stenosis: MR angiography with maximum-intensity projections and multiplanar reformation compared with conventional angiography.颅外颈动脉狭窄的前瞻性评估:最大强度投影和多平面重建磁共振血管造影与传统血管造影的比较
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994 Nov;163(5):1205-12. doi: 10.2214/ajr.163.5.7976902.
6
Comparison of MR angiography with contrast angiography for the diagnosis of carotid artery stenosis.磁共振血管造影与对比血管造影在诊断颈动脉狭窄方面的比较。
J Assoc Physicians India. 1995 Feb;43(2):92-5.
7
Diagnosis of carotid artery stenosis: comparison of 2DFT time-of-flight MR angiography with contrast angiography in 50 patients.颈动脉狭窄的诊断:50例患者中二维傅里叶变换时间飞跃法磁共振血管造影与对比血管造影的比较
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1991 Jan-Feb;12(1):149-54.
8
[Contribution of fast-sequence three-dimensional MRI angiography with Gadolinium injection in the evaluation of supra-aortic vessels].[注射钆剂的快速序列三维磁共振血管造影在评价主动脉弓上血管中的作用]
J Radiol. 1998 Jul;79(7):673-80.
9
Digital subtraction angiography with intravenous injection: assessment of 1,000 carotid bifurcations.静脉注射数字减影血管造影术:对1000个颈动脉分叉处的评估
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1983 May;140(5):855-9. doi: 10.2214/ajr.140.5.855.
10
MR angiography in carotid stenosis: a comparison of three techniques.颈动脉狭窄的磁共振血管造影:三种技术的比较。
Eur J Radiol. 1998 Sep;28(2):117-25. doi: 10.1016/s0720-048x(97)00121-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Prospective evaluation of carotid artery stenosis: elliptic centric contrast-enhanced MR angiography and spiral CT angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography.颈动脉狭窄的前瞻性评估:椭圆中心对比增强磁共振血管造影和螺旋CT血管造影与数字减影血管造影的比较
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2003 May;24(5):1012-9.
2
Use of magnetic resonance angiography to select candidates with recently symptomatic carotid stenosis for surgery: systematic review.利用磁共振血管造影术选择近期有症状的颈动脉狭窄患者进行手术:系统评价
BMJ. 2002 Jan 26;324(7331):198. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7331.198.
3
How should we estimate carotid stenosis using magnetic resonance angiography?我们应该如何利用磁共振血管造影术来评估颈动脉狭窄?
Neuroradiology. 1996 May;38(4):299-305. doi: 10.1007/BF00596574.
4
Comparison of magnetic resonance angiography, duplex ultrasound, and digital subtraction angiography in assessment of extracranial internal carotid artery stenosis.磁共振血管造影、双功超声和数字减影血管造影在评估颅外颈内动脉狭窄中的比较。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1994 Dec;57(12):1466-78. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.57.12.1466.
5
Imaging blood vessels of the head and neck.头部和颈部血管成像。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1995 Sep;59(3):225-37. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.59.3.225.

磁共振血管造影与动脉造影在评估颈总动脉分叉疾病中的对比研究

Assessment of MR angiography versus arteriography for evaluation of cervical carotid bifurcation disease.

作者信息

Laster R E, Acker J D, Halford H H, Nauert T C

机构信息

Methodist Hospitals of Memphis, Tennessee 38104.

出版信息

AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1993 May-Jun;14(3):681-8.

PMID:8517359
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8333372/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess the accuracy of MR angiography alone in screening for vascular stenosis of the common carotid bifurcation.

METHODS

Two hundred two common carotid bifurcations in 101 patients were evaluated with MR angiography and selective contrast arteriography. A two-dimensional time-of-flight pulse sequence was used to obtain sequential transverse images through the common carotid bifurcations. These images were reprojected with a maximum intensity pixel ray-tracing algorithm. Both examinations were blindly graded as either normal or mildly stenotic (0%-29%), moderately stenotic (30%-69%), severely stenotic (70%-99%), or occluded.

RESULTS

Of the 202 common carotid bifurcations, 119 were classified as normal-mild stenosis by contrast arteriography. In this category, MR angiography correctly identified 114 of these as normal to mild stenosis. Among 21 common carotid bifurcations graded as moderate stenosis by arteriography, 15 were correctly graded as moderate by MR angiography. Among 45 common carotid bifurcations graded as severe stenosis by arteriography, 41 of these were correctly graded as severe by MR angiography. There were 17 complete occlusions which were all correctly graded by MR angiography.

CONCLUSION

MR angiography with its high rate of agreement with contrast arteriography can be regarded as an accurate screening method of the common carotid bifurcation.

摘要

目的

评估单纯磁共振血管造影在筛查颈总动脉分叉处血管狭窄方面的准确性。

方法

对101例患者的202个颈总动脉分叉处进行磁共振血管造影和选择性对比动脉造影评估。采用二维时间飞跃脉冲序列获取颈总动脉分叉处的连续横向图像。这些图像通过最大强度像素光线追踪算法进行重投影。两项检查均由不知情的人员分级为正常或轻度狭窄(0%-29%)、中度狭窄(30%-69%)、重度狭窄(70%-99%)或闭塞。

结果

在202个颈总动脉分叉处中,119个经对比动脉造影分类为正常至轻度狭窄。在这一类别中,磁共振血管造影正确地将其中114个识别为正常至轻度狭窄。在动脉造影分级为中度狭窄的21个颈总动脉分叉处中,15个经磁共振血管造影正确分级为中度。在动脉造影分级为重度狭窄的45个颈总动脉分叉处中,其中41个经磁共振血管造影正确分级为重度。有17个完全闭塞,均经磁共振血管造影正确分级。

结论

磁共振血管造影与对比动脉造影的一致性较高,可被视为颈总动脉分叉处的一种准确筛查方法。