Näreaho Anu, Saari Seppo, Meri Seppo, Sukura Antti
Department of Basic Veterinary Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Vet Parasitol. 2009 Feb 23;159(3-4):263-7. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2008.10.037. Epub 2008 Oct 22.
Rats readily become infected with Trichinella spiralis but are more resistant to T. nativa. We infected complement factor C6-deficient (C6-) rats and control (C6+) rats with T. spiralis and T. nativa to compare the effects of membrane attack complex on these parasites in vivo. The 2000 larvae infection dose per rat yielded 652 lpg (larvae per gram) in the C6- group and 608 lpg in the C6+ group with T. spiralis, whereas with T. nativa the corresponding figures were only 1.05 and 1.87 lpg. The difference between the Trichinella species was evident, but the infection intensity was unaffected by the C6 deficiency. When newborn larvae were incubated in C6-deficient and control rat sera for 24h in vitro, no changes in viability were observed. Immunohistochemistry revealed that the musculature of cross-sectioned adults and certain stichocytes bound human complement factors C3, C8 and C9, but not C1q. Interestingly, the outermost layer of the cuticle and the newborn larvae did not show any binding activity. Similar findings were obtained with immunofluorescence microscopy of intact newborn larvae. These results indicate that both T. spiralis and T. nativa have efficient mechanisms to protect themselves against complement attack. The difference in infectivity for rats between the two species, however, is not due to a differential resistance to complement membrane attack complex.
大鼠很容易感染旋毛虫,但对本地毛形线虫更具抵抗力。我们用旋毛虫和本地毛形线虫感染补体因子C6缺陷(C6-)大鼠和对照(C6+)大鼠,以比较膜攻击复合物在体内对这些寄生虫的影响。每只大鼠2000条幼虫的感染剂量,在感染旋毛虫时,C6-组每克组织中的幼虫数(lpg)为652条,C6+组为608条;而感染本地毛形线虫时,相应数字仅为1.05条和1.87条。两种毛形线虫之间的差异很明显,但感染强度不受C6缺陷的影响。将新生幼虫在C6缺陷和对照大鼠血清中体外孵育24小时后,未观察到活力变化。免疫组织化学显示,成虫横切片的肌肉组织和某些杆细胞结合了人补体因子C3、C8和C9,但未结合C1q。有趣的是,角质层的最外层和新生幼虫未显示任何结合活性。完整新生幼虫的免疫荧光显微镜检查也得到了类似结果。这些结果表明,旋毛虫和本地毛形线虫都有有效的机制来保护自己免受补体攻击。然而,这两个物种对大鼠感染性的差异并非由于对补体膜攻击复合物的抗性不同。