Linde Cecilia, Abraham William T, Gold Michael R, St John Sutton Martin, Ghio Stefano, Daubert Claude
Department of Cardiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Division of Cardiovascular Medicine and the Davis Heart and Lung Research Institute, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Dec 2;52(23):1834-1843. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.08.027. Epub 2008 Nov 7.
We sought to determine the effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class II heart failure (HF) and NYHA functional class I (American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association stage C) patients with previous HF symptoms.
Cardiac resynchronization therapy improves left ventricular (LV) structure and function and clinical outcomes in NYHA functional class III and IV HF with prolonged QRS.
Six hundred ten patients with NYHA functional class I or II heart failure with a QRS > or =120 ms and a LV ejection fraction < or =40% received a CRT device (+/-defibrillator) and were randomly assigned to active CRT (CRT-ON; n = 419) or control (CRT-OFF; n = 191) for 12 months. The primary end point was the HF clinical composite response, which scores patients as improved, unchanged, or worsened. The prospectively powered secondary end point was LV end-systolic volume index. Hospitalization for worsening HF was evaluated in a prospective secondary analysis of health care use.
The HF clinical composite response end point, which compared only the percent worsened, indicated 16% worsened in CRT-ON compared with 21% in CRT-OFF (p = 0.10). Patients assigned to CRT-ON experienced a greater improvement in LV end-systolic volume index (-18.4 +/- 29.5 ml/m2 vs. -1.3 +/- 23.4 ml/m2, p < 0.0001) and other measures of LV remodeling. Time-to-first HF hospitalization was significantly delayed in CRT-ON (hazard ratio: 0.47, p = 0.03).
The REVERSE (REsynchronization reVErses Remodeling in Systolic left vEntricular dysfunction) trial demonstrates that CRT, in combination with optimal medical therapy (+/-defibrillator), reduces the risk for heart failure hospitalization and improves ventricular structure and function in NYHA functional class II and NYHA functional class I (American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association stage C) patients with previous HF symptoms. (REsynchronization reVErses Remodeling in Systolic Left vEntricular Dysfunction [REVERSE]; NCT00271154).
我们试图确定心脏再同步治疗(CRT)对纽约心脏协会(NYHA)心功能II级心力衰竭(HF)患者以及曾有HF症状的NYHA心功能I级(美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会C期)患者的影响。
心脏再同步治疗可改善NYHA心功能III级和IV级且QRS时限延长的HF患者的左心室(LV)结构和功能以及临床结局。
610例NYHA心功能I级或II级、QRS≥120毫秒且LV射血分数≤40%的HF患者接受了CRT设备(±除颤器),并被随机分为积极CRT组(CRT-ON;n = 419)或对照组(CRT-OFF;n = 191),为期12个月。主要终点是HF临床综合反应,根据患者情况分为改善、不变或恶化。前瞻性设定的次要终点是LV收缩末期容积指数。在一项关于医疗保健使用的前瞻性次要分析中评估了因HF恶化而住院的情况。
HF临床综合反应终点仅比较恶化百分比,显示CRT-ON组恶化率为16%,而CRT-OFF组为21%(p = 0.10)。分配到CRT-ON组的患者LV收缩末期容积指数有更大改善(-18.4±29.5毫升/平方米对-1.3±23.4毫升/平方米,p < 0.0001)以及其他LV重塑指标。CRT-ON组首次因HF住院的时间显著延迟(风险比:0.47,p = 0.03)。
REVERSE(收缩期左心室功能障碍的再同步逆转重塑)试验表明,CRT联合最佳药物治疗(±除颤器)可降低NYHA心功能II级和NYHA心功能I级(美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会C期)且曾有HF症状患者的HF住院风险,并改善心室结构和功能。(收缩期左心室功能障碍的再同步逆转重塑[REVERSE];NCT00271154)