Sumi Chisato, Asai Takashi, Kawashima Akira, Nawa Teruaki, Shingu Koh
Department of Anesthesiology, Kansai Medical University, Osaka.
Masui. 2008 Nov;57(11):1427-30.
We report a case of gas leakage from an anesthetic circuit, due to mis-installation of a different but very similar canister. A 56-year-old woman was scheduled for a pylogastrectomy. We planned to use a Mera MD757XLV anesthesia machine. At preoperative checking of the anesthetic machine, there was a gas leak from the anesthesia circuit without apparent reasons. We therefore had to use another anesthetic machine, MD705XL, which showed no gas leakage and was used without problems during anesthesia. Closed examination after the operation showed that the gas leakage from the MD757XLV machine occurred, because one of two canisters was wrongly replaced by a canister of MD705XL. The shapes of canisters of these two anesthesia machines look very similar, but there are crucial differences in their specifications, but even the manufacturer did not notice. These unnoticeable differences led to mis-installation of canisters, and one machine provided an airtight seal whereas the other did not. Both manufacturer and users should be aware of this danger.
我们报告一例因错装一个不同但非常相似的滤毒罐导致麻醉回路气体泄漏的病例。一名56岁女性计划接受胃幽门切除术。我们计划使用一台Mera MD757XLV麻醉机。在术前检查麻醉机时,麻醉回路无端出现气体泄漏。因此,我们不得不使用另一台麻醉机MD705XL,该麻醉机未出现气体泄漏,且在麻醉过程中使用正常。术后的仔细检查表明,MD757XLV机器出现气体泄漏是因为两个滤毒罐中的一个被MD705XL的滤毒罐错误替换。这两种麻醉机的滤毒罐形状看起来非常相似,但其规格存在关键差异,甚至连制造商都未注意到。这些不易察觉的差异导致滤毒罐错装,一台机器能实现气密密封,而另一台则不能。制造商和用户都应意识到这种危险。