Torres-Vigil Isabel, Aday Lu Ann, Reyes-Gibby Cielito, De Lima Liliana, Herrera Angelica P, Mendoza Tito, Cleeland Charles S
Department of Health Disparities Research, Center for Research on Minority Health at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77021, USA.
J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2008;22(1):7-20. doi: 10.1080/15360280801989195.
This paper describes an innovative Pan-American survey on advanced-cancer care and examines the quality-of-care provided by Latin American institutions. A convenience sample of 777 physicians and nurses who treat cancer patients in Argentina, Brazil, Cuba, Mexico, and Peru were surveyed. Providers were identified through mass mailings, distribution at professional meetings and conferences, collaboration with regional institutions, professional organizations, and PAHO and online posting. Multiple linear regression analyses were conducted to identify predictors of quality-of-care assessments in each country. The five predictive models were subsequently compared descriptively. Higher access to care ratings and greater availability of end-of-life services corresponded with improved institutional quality-of-care ratings for all five countries. Barring respondents from Cuba, providers from the other four nations who practice in public institutions rated the quality of advanced-cancer care in their own institutions lower than those practicing in private hospitals or specialized cancer centers. Other institutional quality-of-care predictors included type of city, affordability-of-care ratings, availability of opioid analgesics, where patients die, barriers to cancer pain management, and the provider's specialty and gender. These findings highlight the need for providing accessible care and services to improve the quality of advanced-cancer care in Latin American institutions. Efforts should be aimed at improving the care offered in public institutions and addressing other types of disparities that may exist within countries by creating supportive and palliative cancer care programs that are accessible and affordable to those most in need.
本文介绍了一项关于晚期癌症护理的创新性泛美调查,并考察了拉丁美洲机构所提供的护理质量。对阿根廷、巴西、古巴、墨西哥和秘鲁777名治疗癌症患者的医生和护士进行了便利抽样调查。通过大规模邮寄、在专业会议和研讨会发放问卷、与地区机构、专业组织、泛美卫生组织合作以及在线发布等方式确定调查对象。进行了多项线性回归分析,以确定每个国家护理质量评估的预测因素。随后对这五个预测模型进行了描述性比较。所有五个国家的护理可及性评分越高和临终服务的可获得性越高,机构护理质量评分就越高。除古巴的受访者外,在其他四个国家的公立医院工作的医护人员对自己机构晚期癌症护理质量的评分低于在私立医院或专业癌症中心工作的人员。其他机构护理质量预测因素包括城市类型、护理可承受性评分、阿片类镇痛药的可获得性、患者死亡地点、癌症疼痛管理的障碍以及医护人员的专业和性别。这些发现凸显了为提高拉丁美洲机构晚期癌症护理质量提供可及护理和服务的必要性。应努力改善公立医院提供的护理,并通过创建对最有需要的人可及且负担得起的支持性和姑息性癌症护理项目,解决各国可能存在的其他类型差异。