Williams Marian E, Atkins Monique, Soles Tamara
University of Southern California, University Center for Excellence in Developmental Disabilities (USC UCEDD), Childrens Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90027, USA.
J Autism Dev Disord. 2009 Apr;39(4):660-9. doi: 10.1007/s10803-008-0668-1. Epub 2008 Dec 3.
Review of 78 evaluations for 29 young children examined practices used in assessment of autism spectrum disorders in three settings: public schools, developmental disabilities eligibility determinations, and our hospital-based early childhood mental health program. While similar rates of classification of autism spectrum disorders were found across sites, the rate of agreement by different evaluators for individual children was only 45%. Further, most community evaluators did not follow best practice guidelines nor use autism diagnostic tools with established psychometric properties. In this sample of primarily Latino, Spanish-speaking children, most community evaluators did not document assessment of the child in their native language, nor address the impact of language in their assessments.
对29名幼儿的78份评估报告进行了回顾,考察了在三种环境中评估自闭症谱系障碍所采用的方法:公立学校、发育障碍资格判定以及我们基于医院的幼儿心理健康项目。虽然各场所自闭症谱系障碍的分类率相似,但不同评估者对个别儿童的一致率仅为45%。此外,大多数社区评估者未遵循最佳实践指南,也未使用具有既定心理测量特性的自闭症诊断工具。在这个主要为讲西班牙语的拉丁裔儿童样本中,大多数社区评估者未记录用其母语对儿童进行的评估,也未在评估中考虑语言的影响。