• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Using routinely collected data for clinical research.

作者信息

Safran C

机构信息

Charles A. Dana Research Institute, Boston, MA.

出版信息

Stat Med. 1991 Apr;10(4):559-64. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780100407.

DOI:10.1002/sim.4780100407
PMID:1905417
Abstract

Clinical research involving prospective data collection in randomized controlled trials is not always feasible. Increasingly, hospitals are developing large clinical databases that are waiting to be mined. We have developed a computer program, ClinQuery, that facilitates such exploration and analysis. We have also shown in a series of studies that the use of clinical data is a powerful tool in health services research. In some cases, we have shown that coded data are inaccurate and that alternative clinical data are preferable. In other cases, a combination of clinical data and coded discharge diagnoses is preferable.

摘要

相似文献

1
Using routinely collected data for clinical research.
Stat Med. 1991 Apr;10(4):559-64. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780100407.
2
Exploring a hospital-wide database: integrating statistical functions with ClinQuery.探索全院数据库:将统计功能与临床查询相结合。
Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1991:583-7.
3
Data structure and computer program for fast interactive searches of clinical diagnoses.用于临床诊断快速交互式搜索的数据结构和计算机程序。
Med Inform (Lond). 1993 Jan-Mar;18(1):45-51. doi: 10.3109/14639239309034467.
4
Practice databases and their uses in clinical research.实践数据库及其在临床研究中的应用。
Stat Med. 1991 Apr;10(4):541-57. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780100406.
5
Exploration and exploitation of clinical databases.
Int J Biomed Comput. 1995 Apr;39(1):151-6. doi: 10.1016/0020-7101(94)01094-h.
6
Clinical and research databases in healthcare research.医疗保健研究中的临床和研究数据库。
Nurse Res. 2008;15(4):27-34. doi: 10.7748/nr2008.07.15.4.27.c6659.
7
Spine update. Administrative databases in spine research.脊柱研究进展。脊柱研究中的管理数据库。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997 Jun 1;22(11):1270-5. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199706010-00023.
8
Comparative hospital databases: value for management and quality.比较医院数据库:对管理和质量的价值。
Qual Health Care. 1994 Mar;3(1):3-10. doi: 10.1136/qshc.3.1.3.
9
Selecting disease-outcome pairs for monitoring the quality of hospital care.选择疾病-结局对以监测医院护理质量。
Med Care. 1995 Jan;33(1):75-89. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199501000-00007.
10
Using utilization review information to improve hospital efficiency.利用利用情况审查信息提高医院效率。
Hosp Health Serv Adm. 1991 Winter;36(4):473-90.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of the reported data linkage process and associated quality issues for linked routinely collected healthcare data in multimorbidity research: a systematic methodology review.评价多疾病研究中报告的数据链接过程及相关质量问题:系统方法学综述。
BMJ Open. 2023 May 8;13(5):e069212. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069212.
2
Describing and Modeling the Burden of Hospitalization of Patients With Neoplasms in Ghana Using Routine Health Data for 2012-2017.利用 2012-2017 年常规卫生数据描述和建模加纳肿瘤患者住院负担。
JCO Glob Oncol. 2022 Aug;8:e2100416. doi: 10.1200/GO.21.00416.
3
Developing a Data Quality Standard Primer for Cardiovascular Risk Assessment from Electronic Health Record Data Using the DataGauge Process.
利用 DataGauge 流程从电子健康记录数据中开发心血管风险评估数据质量标准入门。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2022 Feb 21;2021:388-397. eCollection 2021.
4
Exploring the Hazards of Scaling Up Clinical Data Analyses: A Drug Side Effect Discovery Case Report.探索扩大临床数据分析的危害:药物副作用发现案例报告。
AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc. 2021 May 17;2021:180-189. eCollection 2021.
5
What Oncologists Want: Identifying Challenges and Preferences on Diagnosis Data Entry to Reduce EHR-Induced Burden and Improve Clinical Data Quality.肿瘤学家的需求:确定诊断数据录入方面的挑战和偏好,以减轻电子健康记录带来的负担并提高临床数据质量。
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2021 May;5:527-540. doi: 10.1200/CCI.20.00174.
6
Catch Me if You Can: Acute Events Hidden in Structured Chronic Disease Diagnosis Descriptions Show Detectable Recording Patterns in EHR.《能抓到我算你本事:隐藏在结构化慢性病诊断描述中的急性事件在电子健康记录中呈现出可检测的记录模式》
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2021 Jan 25;2020:373-382. eCollection 2020.
7
Workflow Differences Affect Data Accuracy in Oncologic EHRs: A First Step Toward Detangling the Diagnosis Data Babel.工作流程差异影响肿瘤电子病历中的数据准确性:厘清诊断数据混乱的第一步。
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2020 Jun;4:529-538. doi: 10.1200/CCI.19.00114.
8
A tale of three subspecialties: Diagnosis recording patterns are internally consistent but Specialty-Dependent.三个亚专业的故事:诊断记录模式在内部是一致的,但因专业而异。
JAMIA Open. 2019 Aug 5;2(3):369-377. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooz020. eCollection 2019 Oct.
9
Comparison of the cohort selection performance of Australian Medicines Terminology to Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical mappings.澳大利亚药物术语与解剖治疗学化学映射的队列选择性能比较。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019 Nov 1;26(11):1237-1246. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocz143.
10
Lost in Translation: Diagnosis Records Show More Inaccuracies After Biopsy in Oncology Care EHRs.翻译失误:诊断记录显示肿瘤护理电子健康记录活检后存在更多不准确之处。
AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc. 2019 May 6;2019:325-334. eCollection 2019.