Suppr超能文献

评估性偏差:生理、历史及自我报告测量方法的比较

Assessing sexual deviance: a comparison of physiological, historical, and self-report measures.

作者信息

Stinson Jill D, Becker Judith V

机构信息

Fulton State Hospital, Fulton, MO 65251, USA.

出版信息

J Psychiatr Pract. 2008 Nov;14(6):379-88. doi: 10.1097/01.pra.0000341892.51124.85.

Abstract

A variety of instruments and techniques are available for assessing sexually deviant interests and arousal among those who have committed sexual offenses. These measures include those that rely on objective or physiological data, self-reported information from the offender, and historical behavior. In this study, several assessment methods from each category were examined and compared with one another to determine their similarity and their usefulness in identifying sexual interest and arousal patterns in known sexual offenders. Comparisons between these instruments and their relation to known behavior are described, as well as effective combinations of assessment tools that may be helpful in better categorizing interest and arousal patterns across different types of sex offenses.

摘要

有多种工具和技术可用于评估性犯罪者的性变态兴趣和性唤起。这些测量方法包括那些依赖客观或生理数据、犯罪者自我报告的信息以及过往行为的方法。在本研究中,对每个类别中的几种评估方法进行了检验并相互比较,以确定它们在识别已知性犯罪者的性兴趣和性唤起模式方面的相似性和有用性。描述了这些工具之间的比较及其与已知行为的关系,以及评估工具的有效组合,这些组合可能有助于更好地对不同类型性犯罪的兴趣和性唤起模式进行分类。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验