Brandt Kenneth D, Dieppe Paul, Radin Eric
Kansas University Medical Center, 5755 Windsor Drive, Fairway, Kansas City, KS 66205, USA.
Med Clin North Am. 2009 Jan;93(1):1-24, xv. doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2008.08.009.
Because of the implications for prevention and treatment, how a clinician views osteoarthritis (OA) matters. We view OA as an attempt to contain a mechanical problem in the joint and as failed repair of damage caused by excessive mechanical stress on the joint. OA is organ failure of the synovial joint. Because of insufficient focus on reduction of the habitually loaded contact area of the joint and on aberrant loading, we believe that therapeutic efforts aimed at pathogenetic mechanisms in OA have been misdirected: neither the large role that a reduction of excessive levels of mechanical stress plays in promoting the healing response in OA nor the evidence that relief of joint pain and improvement in function, rather than the appearance of the articular surface, are the most important outcomes of the healing process have been sufficiently emphasized. Various mechanical abnormalities can trigger the processes involved in repair and attempts by the joint to contain the mechanical insult, but without a return to mechanical normality, attempts at healing will fail. In our view, drugs may be helpful symptomatically, but cannot accomplish this. In our view, as long as the joint remains in the same adverse mechanical environment that got it into trouble in the first place, it is unlikely that a drug that inhibits a specific enzyme or cytokine in the pathways of cartilage breakdown, or further stimulates the already increased synthesis of cartilage matrix molecules will solve the problem of OA. Also, because the subchondral bone is critically important in containing the mechanical abnormalities that damage the cartilage, emphasis on cartilage repair alone is likely to be futile. On the other hand, if the abnormal stresses on the joint are corrected, intervention with a structure-modifying drug may be superfluous.
鉴于对预防和治疗的意义,临床医生如何看待骨关节炎(OA)至关重要。我们认为OA是关节试图控制机械问题以及对关节过度机械应力造成的损伤修复失败。OA是滑膜关节的器官功能衰竭。由于对减少关节习惯性负荷接触面积和异常负荷的关注不足,我们认为针对OA发病机制的治疗努力方向有误:既没有充分强调降低过高水平的机械应力在促进OA愈合反应中所起的重要作用,也没有充分强调关节疼痛缓解和功能改善而非关节表面外观才是愈合过程最重要的结果这一证据。各种机械异常可引发关节修复过程以及控制机械损伤的尝试,但如果不能恢复机械正常状态,愈合尝试将会失败。我们认为,药物可能在缓解症状方面有帮助,但无法实现这一点。我们认为,只要关节仍处于最初导致其出现问题的相同不良机械环境中,一种抑制软骨分解途径中特定酶或细胞因子,或进一步刺激已增加的软骨基质分子合成的药物不太可能解决OA问题。此外,由于软骨下骨在控制损伤软骨的机械异常方面至关重要,仅强调软骨修复可能是徒劳的。另一方面,如果关节上的异常应力得到纠正,使用结构改善药物进行干预可能就多余了。