Guest Steve, Essick Greg, Dessirier Jean Marc, Blot Kevin, Lopetcharat Kannapon, McGlone Francis
Center for Neurosensory Disorders, School of Dentistry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 2160 Old Dental Bldg., Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7450, USA.
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2009 Feb;130(2):115-26. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.10.007. Epub 2008 Dec 6.
Here we report two experiments that investigated the tactile perception of one's own skin (intrapersonal touch) versus the skin of other individuals (interpersonal touch). In the first experiment, thirteen female participants rated, along four perceptual attributes, the skin of their own palm and volar forearm, then that of several of the other participants. Ratings were made using visual analogue scales for perceived smoothness, softness, stickiness, and pleasantness. One's own skin was rated less pleasant than the skin of others. For both intra- and interpersonal touch, the forearm skin was rated smoother, softer, less sticky and more pleasant than the palmar skin. In the second experiment, ten pairs of female participants rated each other's palm and volar forearm skin, with the skin of the touched individual being assessed before and after the application of skin emollients that alter skin feel. As in the first experiment, the untreated skin of others was rated more pleasant than the participants' own skin, and the forearm versus palm differences were replicated. However, the emollient had generally larger effects on self-assessments than the assessments of others, and the site effect showed greater positive sensory and pleasantness increases for palm versus volar forearm. The disparate results of the two experiments suggest that attention, influenced by the ecological importance of the stimulus, is more important to assessment of touched skin than ownership of the skin or the contribution to self-touch made by the additional receptors in the passively touched skin. In both experiments, the pleasantness of touched skin was associated with the skin's perceived smoothness and softness, with weak trends toward negative associations with its perceived stickiness, consistent with prior research using inanimate surfaces (e.g., textiles and sandpapers).
在此,我们报告了两项实验,它们研究了对自身皮肤(人际内触摸)与他人皮肤(人际间触摸)的触觉感知。在第一个实验中,13名女性参与者沿着四个感知属性对自己的手掌和掌侧前臂皮肤进行评分,然后对其他几位参与者的皮肤进行评分。使用视觉模拟量表对感知到的光滑度、柔软度、粘性和愉悦度进行评分。自己的皮肤被评为不如他人的皮肤愉悦。对于人际内触摸和人际间触摸,前臂皮肤被评为比手掌皮肤更光滑、更柔软、粘性更小且更愉悦。在第二个实验中,10对女性参与者对彼此的手掌和掌侧前臂皮肤进行评分,在涂抹改变皮肤感觉的皮肤润肤剂之前和之后对被触摸个体的皮肤进行评估。与第一个实验一样,他人未处理的皮肤被评为比参与者自己的皮肤更愉悦,并且前臂与手掌的差异得到了重复。然而,润肤剂对自我评估的影响通常比对他人评估的影响更大,并且部位效应显示手掌相对于掌侧前臂在感觉和愉悦度方面有更大的积极增加。这两项实验的不同结果表明,受刺激的生态重要性影响的注意力,对触摸皮肤的评估比皮肤的所属权或被动触摸皮肤中额外感受器对自我触摸的贡献更为重要。在两项实验中,触摸皮肤的愉悦度与皮肤感知到的光滑度和柔软度相关,与感知到的粘性呈负相关的趋势较弱,这与之前使用无生命表面(如纺织品和砂纸)的研究一致。