Guest Steve, Ma Angera, Mehrabyan Anahit, Essick Greg, Hopkinson Andrew, McGlone Francis
Center for Neurosensory Disorders, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Somatosens Mot Res. 2012;29(3):89-102. doi: 10.3109/08990220.2012.686937. Epub 2012 Jul 2.
Little is known about the tactile-perceptual structure of fluids. Therefore, ten fluids with diverse, characterized rheologies were rated by 16 females, on 27 sensory attributes (e.g., "slippery") and 14 emotional attributes (e.g., "enjoyable") via five-point categorical scales. Fluids were assessed against the volar forearm and underarm, sites that commonly experience contact with fluids during the use of personal care products. Application of fluids was either by the participant to their own body ("self-applied") or by the experimenter to the participant's body ("experimenter-applied"). Separate factor analyses of the sensory and emotional attributes for different body sites and modes of touch suggested approximately the same factorial structure in each case. Four general sensory factors emerged, labeled Lubricating, Textured, Silken, and Viscous, and two emotional factors, Comfortable and Arousing. These factors resembled those from equivalent work that used solid materials as stimuli, emphasizing that despite the differences in perceptual structure between fluid-coated and dry, solid surfaces, different body sites, and modes of touch influence the perception of fluid and dry stimuli similarly. As expected, fluids varied widely in how they scored on the factors. Site-wise differences were found, whereby stimuli assessed against the forearm were rated as more Lubricating, less Textured, more Silken, and more Comfortable than they were against the underarm. Self-applied touch was less Comfortable than experimenter-applied. The physical and perceptual were linked insofar as greater measured viscosity at low shear rates was associated with perceptions of cold and wet, whereas at high shear rates, greater viscosity was associated with greater perceived thickness.
关于流体的触觉感知结构,我们所知甚少。因此,16名女性通过五点分类量表,对10种具有不同特征流变学的流体,在27种感官属性(如“滑溜”)和14种情感属性(如“愉悦”)方面进行了评分。流体是在前臂掌侧和腋下进行评估的,这些部位在使用个人护理产品时通常会接触到流体。流体的涂抹方式要么是参与者自己涂抹在自己身上(“自我涂抹”),要么是实验者涂抹在参与者身上(“实验者涂抹”)。对不同身体部位和触摸方式的感官和情感属性进行的单独因子分析表明,每种情况下的因子结构大致相同。出现了四个一般感官因子,分别标记为润滑、有纹理、丝滑和粘性,以及两个情感因子,舒适和唤起。这些因子与使用固体材料作为刺激的等效研究中的因子相似,强调尽管流体涂层表面和干燥固体表面在感知结构上存在差异,但不同的身体部位和触摸方式对流体和干燥刺激的感知影响相似。正如预期的那样,流体在这些因子上的得分差异很大。发现了部位差异,即在前臂上评估的刺激比在腋下评估的刺激被评为更润滑、纹理更少、更丝滑和更舒适。自我涂抹的触摸比实验者涂抹的触摸更不舒适。物理和感知之间存在联系,因为在低剪切速率下测得的粘度越大,与冷和湿的感知相关,而在高剪切速率下,粘度越大,与感知到的厚度越大相关。