Wallace Lorraine S, Ergen William F, Cassada David C, Freeman Michael B, Grandas Oscar H, Stevens Scott L, Goldman Mitchell H
Department of Family Medicine, University of Tennessee Graduate School of Medicine, Knoxville, Tennessee 37920, USA.
Ann Vasc Surg. 2009 Jul-Aug;23(4):446-52. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2008.10.005. Epub 2008 Dec 6.
The purposes of this study were to develop and validate the (1) Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Vascular Surgery (REAL_VS) for researchers studying the impact of literacy skills as related to vascular surgery-related knowledge and outcomes and (2) short version of the REAL_VS (REAL_VSs) to allow clinicians to gauge their patients' familiarity with vascular surgery-related terms. A three-phase process was used to identify potential words for inclusion in the REAL_VS, including reviewing Internet-based patient education material content and listening to a random sample of 50 archived audiorecordings of vascular surgeon-patient encounters. The REAL_VS was composed of 75 terms (e.g., stent, gangrene, invasive, aneurysm) of varying pronunciation difficulty. One hundred fifty-two English-speaking patients (>or=18 years of age) attending a university-based vascular surgery clinic were recruited to participate in this study (mean age = 61.4 +/- 14.6 years). During face-to-face interviews, patients' sociodemographic information was collected, and patients were administered the widely used Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine (REALM) and REAL_VS. Mean scores on the REALM (56.9 +/- 14.0) and REAL_VS (63.3 +/- 15.6) were highly correlated (Spearmans rank correlation [rho] = 0.91; p < 0.00). Internal consistency of the REAL_VS (Cronbachs alpha = 0.98) was excellent. Mean scores on the REAL_VSs (4.1 +/- 2.7) were highly correlated with both the REALM (rho = 0.82; p < 0.00) and REAL_VS (rho = 0.94; p < 0.00). Internal consistency, measured using Cronbachs alpha, of the REAL_VSs was 0.86. This study demonstrates that both the REAL_VS and REAL_VSs are both promising tools for use in vascular surgery research and clinical practice, respectively.
(1)血管外科成人识字快速评估工具(REAL_VS),供研究识字技能对血管外科相关知识及治疗结果影响的研究人员使用;(2)REAL_VS的简短版本(REAL_VSs),以便临床医生评估患者对血管外科相关术语的熟悉程度。采用三阶段流程来确定纳入REAL_VS的潜在词汇,包括审查基于互联网的患者教育材料内容,以及听取50份血管外科医生与患者会诊的存档音频记录随机样本。REAL_VS由75个发音难度各异的术语组成(如支架、坏疽、侵入性、动脉瘤)。招募了152名在大学血管外科诊所就诊的讲英语患者(年龄≥18岁)参与本研究(平均年龄 = 61.4 ± 14.6岁)。在面对面访谈期间,收集了患者的社会人口统计学信息,并让患者接受广泛使用的医学成人识字快速评估工具(REALM)和REAL_VS测试。REALM(56.9 ± 14.0)和REAL_VS(63.3 ± 15.6)的平均得分高度相关(斯皮尔曼等级相关性[rho] = 0.91;p < 0.00)。REAL_VS的内部一致性(克朗巴赫α系数 = 0.98)极佳。REAL_VSs的平均得分(4.1 ± 2.7)与REALM(rho = 0.82;p < 0.00)和REAL_VS(rho = 0.94;p < 0.00)均高度相关。使用克朗巴赫α系数测量的REAL_VSs的内部一致性为0.86。本研究表明,REAL_VS和REAL_VSs分别是血管外科研究和临床实践中很有前景的工具。