Life, death, and harm: staying within the boundaries of nonmaleficence.
作者信息
Woien Sandra
机构信息
Regis University, Denver, CO 80221-1099, USA.
出版信息
Am J Bioeth. 2008 Nov;8(11):31-2. doi: 10.1080/15265160802513176.
PMID:19061106
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Life, death, and harm: staying within the boundaries of nonmaleficence.
Am J Bioeth. 2008 Nov;8(11):31-2. doi: 10.1080/15265160802513176.
2
A case against something that is not the case: the Groningen Protocol and the moral principle of non-maleficence.
Am J Bioeth. 2008 Nov;8(11):29-31. doi: 10.1080/15265160802521039.
3
Revisiting justified nonvoluntary euthanasia.
Am J Bioeth. 2008 Nov;8(11):33-5. doi: 10.1080/15265160802513168.
4
We cannot accurately predict the extent of an infant's future suffering: the Groningen Protocol is too dangerous to support.我们无法准确预测婴儿未来遭受痛苦的程度：格罗宁根议定书支持起来太危险了。
Am J Bioeth. 2008 Nov;8(11):27-9. doi: 10.1080/15265160802513150.
5
A case against justified non-voluntary active euthanasia (the Groningen Protocol).反对正当的非自愿主动安乐死（《格罗宁根协议》）的一个案例。
Am J Bioeth. 2008 Nov;8(11):23-6. doi: 10.1080/15265160802513085.
6
Selective nontreatment of the terminally ill: an Orthodox moral perspective.对绝症患者的选择性不治疗：一种东正教的道德视角。
St Vladmirs Theol Q. 1989;33(3):261-72.
7
A matter of life and death: Reform Judaism and the defective child.
J Reform Jud. 1984 Fall;41(4):14-30.
8
Life and death choices in neonatal care: applying shared decision-making focused on parental values.新生儿护理中的生死抉择：应用以父母价值观为重点的共同决策。
Am J Bioeth. 2011 Feb;11(2):35-6. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2010.540067.
9
Infant care review committees: their moral responsibilities.
Linacre Q. 1985 Nov;52(4):361-74.
10
The moral status of the newborn and its implications for medical decision making.新生儿的道德地位及其对医疗决策的影响。
Theor Med Bioeth. 2007;28(5):349-55. doi: 10.1007/s11017-007-9045-x.
Zotero 插件