Paterson Kade L, Hill Keith D, Lythgo Noel D, Maschette Wayne
School of Exercise Science, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Dec;89(12):2360-5. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.06.018.
To examine the reliability and systematic bias in spatiotemporal gait parameters recorded in healthy women during repeated single and continuous overground walking trials.
Test-retest.
University laboratory.
Young (n=13) and older adult (n=14) women volunteers.
Not applicable.
Spatiotemporal data were collected from an 8.1-m GAITRite mat during 10 trials of discrete single walks and 10 laps of a continuous circuit presented in random order over 2 separate test sessions. Paired t tests, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), SE of measurement, and coefficients of variation (CV) were calculated.
The relative and absolute measures of reliability showed most spatiotemporal variables recorded during the single and continuous walking protocols were reliable. Step length, foot angle, and step and stance times were found to be the most reliable parameters, with ICCs ranging from 0.84 to 0.95, CVs from 2.06% to 4.02%, and SE of measurements of 1.59 to 2.04 cm for step length, 1.32 degrees to 1.71 degrees for foot angle, and 0.011 to 0.025 seconds for step and stance times. Reliability estimates were similar for the single and continuous trial conditions and between the young and older women. Although small mean differences in the gait parameters were found across the test sessions, many of these parameters showed systematic bias (P<or=.05). In the single trial condition, the majority (65%) of the gait parameters showed significant bias, whereas in the continuous condition only 19% of the parameters exhibited bias. For the young women, 54% of the parameters showed systematic bias (P<or=.05) in the single trial condition, whereas 77% of the parameters exhibited bias for the older women. In the continuous walking condition, 38% of the gait parameters showed systematic bias (P<or=.05) for the young women, whereas no systematic bias was found in the gait parameters of the older women.
This study shows that both the single and continuous walking protocols are reliable methods for the collection of gait data in young and older women. It also shows that a continuous overground walking protocol produces less bias in test-retest spatiotemporal gait data. Therefore, a continuous protocol may be a better method when attempting to monitor gait changes over time, especially for older women.
在健康女性重复进行单次和连续的地面行走试验期间,检查时空步态参数记录的可靠性和系统偏差。
重测法。
大学实验室。
年轻女性志愿者(n = 13)和老年女性志愿者(n = 14)。
不适用。
在两个单独的测试环节中,以随机顺序从8.1米长的GAITRite步行垫上收集离散单次行走10次试验和连续一圈行走10圈的时空数据。计算配对t检验、组内相关系数(ICC)、测量标准误(SE)和变异系数(CV)。
可靠性的相对和绝对测量结果表明,在单次和连续行走方案期间记录的大多数时空变量是可靠的。步长、足角、步幅和站立时间被发现是最可靠的参数,ICC范围为0.84至0.95,CV范围为2.06%至4.02%,步长的测量标准误为1.59至2.04厘米,足角为1.32度至1.71度,步幅和站立时间为0.011至0.025秒。单次和连续试验条件下以及年轻和老年女性之间的可靠性估计相似。尽管在测试环节中发现步态参数存在小的平均差异,但其中许多参数显示出系统偏差(P≤0.05)。在单次试验条件下,大多数(65%)步态参数显示出显著偏差,而在连续条件下只有19%的参数表现出偏差。对于年轻女性,54%的参数在单次试验条件下显示出系统偏差(P≤0.05),而老年女性中77%的参数表现出偏差。在连续行走条件下,38%的步态参数在年轻女性中显示出系统偏差(P≤0.05),而老年女性的步态参数未发现系统偏差。
本研究表明,单次和连续行走方案都是收集年轻和老年女性步态数据的可靠方法。研究还表明,连续地面行走方案在重测时空步态数据时产生的偏差较小。因此,在试图监测随时间变化的步态时,连续方案可能是更好的方法,尤其是对于老年女性。