Sport Performance Research in New Zealand (SPRINZ), AUT Millennium Institute, AUT University, Auckland 1010, New Zealand.
Department of Sport and Recreation, Toi Ohomai Institute of Technology, Tauranga 3112, New Zealand.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 22;20(6):5227. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20065227.
To understand the methodological approaches taken by various research groups and determine the kinematic variables that could consistently and reliably differentiate between concussed and non-concussed individuals.
MEDLINE via PubMed, CINAHL Complete via EBSCO, EBSCOhost, SPORTDiscus, and Scopus were searched from inception until 31 December 2021, using key terms related to concussion, mild traumatic brain injury, gait, cognition and dual task. Studies that reported spatiotemporal kinematic outcomes were included. Data were extracted using a customised spreadsheet, including detailed information on participant characteristics, assessment protocols, equipment used, and outcomes.
Twenty-three studies involving 1030 participants met the inclusion criteria. Ten outcome measures were reported across these articles. Some metrics such as gait velocity and stride length may be promising but are limited by the status of the current research; the majority of the reported variables were not sensitive enough across technologies to consistently differentiate between concussed and non-concussed individuals. Understanding variable sensitivity was made more difficult given the absence of any reporting of reliability of the protocols and variables in the respective studies.
Given the current status of the literature and the methodologies reviewed, there would seem little consensus on which gait parameters are best to determine return to play readiness after concussion. There is potential in this area for such technologies and protocols to be utilised as a tool for identifying and monitoring concussion; however, improving understanding of the variability and validity of technologies and protocols underpins the suggested directions of future research. Inertial measurement units appear to be the most promising technology in this aspect and should guide the focus of future research.
Results of this study may have an impact on what technology is chosen and may be utilised to assist with concussion diagnosis and return to play protocols.
了解各个研究小组采用的方法学方法,并确定能够一致且可靠地区分脑震荡和非脑震荡个体的运动学变量。
通过 PubMed 搜索 MEDLINE、EBSCO 中的 CINAHL Complete、EBSCOhost、SPORTDiscus 和 Scopus,检索时间从建库起至 2021 年 12 月 31 日,使用与脑震荡、轻度创伤性脑损伤、步态、认知和双重任务相关的关键词。纳入报告时空运动学结果的研究。使用定制的电子表格提取数据,包括参与者特征、评估方案、使用的设备和结果的详细信息。
23 项涉及 1030 名参与者的研究符合纳入标准。这些文章报告了 10 项结果测量。一些指标,如步态速度和步长,可能很有前途,但受到当前研究状况的限制;大多数报告的变量在不同技术之间不够敏感,无法一致地区分脑震荡和非脑震荡个体。由于缺乏对协议和变量可靠性的任何报告,使得理解变量敏感性变得更加困难。
鉴于目前文献和审查的方法学,对于哪些步态参数最适合确定脑震荡后的重返比赛准备状态,似乎没有达成共识。在这个领域,这些技术和协议有可能被用作识别和监测脑震荡的工具;然而,提高对技术和协议的可变性和有效性的理解,是未来研究建议的方向。惯性测量单元在这方面似乎是最有前途的技术,应指导未来研究的重点。
这项研究的结果可能会对选择哪种技术产生影响,并可能用于协助脑震荡诊断和重返比赛协议。