Upadhyay Madhur, Yadav Sumit, Patil Sameer
Division of Orthodontics, Department of Craniofacial Sciences, School of Dental Medicine, University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT 06030, USA.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 Dec;134(6):803-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.10.025.
This study was conducted to determine the efficiency of mini-implants as intraoral anchorage units for en-masse retraction of the 6 maxillary anterior teeth when the first premolars are extracted compared with conventional methods of anchorage reinforcement.
Thirty patients requiring high anchorage after extraction of the maxillary first premolars were selected for this study. They were divided into 2 groups of 15 each. In the first group (G1), mini-implants were used for en-masse retraction; in the second group (G2), conventional methods of anchorage preservation were followed. Horizontal, vertical, and angular positions of the maxillary first molar and central incisor were evaluated cephalometrically before and after orthodontic retraction.
The maxillary first molars in the G1 patients showed net distal movement of 0.55 mm, and mesial movement of 1.95 mm was found in G2. The differences were statistically significant. Distal tipping of the first molar of -0.13 degrees+/-3.63 degrees was seen in G1, and mesial tipping of 3.7 degrees+/-3.9 degrees was observed in G2. No significant differences were found in the rates of incisor retraction between the 2 groups. However, G1 showed more than 2 mm of incisor intrusion; this was statistically significant.
Mini-implants are efficient for intraoral anchorage reinforcement for en-masse retraction and intrusion of maxillary anterior teeth. No anchorage loss was seen in either the horizontal or the vertical direction in G1 when compared with G2. However, a statistically significant decrease in intermolar width was noted in G1.
本研究旨在确定与传统支抗增强方法相比,微型种植体作为口腔内支抗单位用于上颌6颗前牙整体远中移动(拔除第一前磨牙时)的效率。
本研究选取了30例拔除上颌第一前磨牙后需要强支抗的患者。他们被分为两组,每组15人。第一组(G1)使用微型种植体进行整体远中移动;第二组(G2)采用传统的支抗保持方法。在正畸远中移动前后,通过头影测量法对上颌第一磨牙和中切牙的水平、垂直和角度位置进行评估。
G1组患者的上颌第一磨牙出现了0.55mm的净远中移动,而G2组出现了1.95mm的近中移动。差异具有统计学意义。G1组第一磨牙远中倾斜-0.13度±3.63度,G2组近中倾斜3.7度±3.9度。两组间切牙远中移动速率无显著差异。然而,G1组切牙出现了超过2mm的垂直压低;这具有统计学意义。
微型种植体对于上颌前牙整体远中移动和垂直压低的口腔内支抗增强是有效的。与G2组相比G1组在水平或垂直方向均未出现支抗丧失。然而,G1组磨牙间宽度出现了具有统计学意义的减小。