Townley Greg, Kloos Bret, Wright Patricia A
Department of Psychology, University of South Carolina, 224 Barnwell College, 1512 Pendleton Street, Columbia, SC 29208, USA.
Department of Psychology, University of South Carolina, 224 Barnwell College, 1512 Pendleton Street, Columbia, SC 29208, USA.
Health Place. 2009 Jun;15(2):520-531. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2008.08.011. Epub 2008 Oct 18.
Community integration research explores community contexts and factors that encourage or hinder individuals with serious mental illness (SMI) from actively participating in community life. This research agenda can be advanced by using mixed-methods that better document the relationships between contextual factors and individual experience. Two such methods were applied to a mixed-methods study of 40 adults with SMI living in independent housing in the Southeastern United States. Their contextualized experiences of community integration were measured by applying innovative participatory mapping and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) mapping techniques. Use of these methods in conjunction with one another facilitated the creation of activity spaces, which can measure geographic accessibility and help to represent an individual's experience of place and degree of mobility. The utility of these newly applied methods for better understanding community integration for persons with SMI is explored and implications for using these measures in research and practice are discussed.
社区融合研究探讨了鼓励或阻碍重度精神疾病(SMI)患者积极参与社区生活的社区背景和因素。通过使用混合方法可以推进这一研究议程,这些方法能更好地记录背景因素与个人经历之间的关系。两种这样的方法被应用于一项针对40名居住在美国东南部独立住房中的重度精神疾病成年患者的混合方法研究。通过应用创新的参与式绘图和地理信息系统(GIS)绘图技术来衡量他们社区融合的情境化经历。将这些方法相互结合使用有助于创建活动空间,活动空间可以衡量地理可达性,并有助于呈现个人对场所的体验和流动程度。本文探讨了这些新应用方法对于更好地理解重度精神疾病患者社区融合的效用,并讨论了在研究和实践中使用这些测量方法的意义。