• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生物膜抗生素敏感性测试的回顾性分析:囊性纤维化急性加重期临床反应的更好预测指标

A retrospective analysis of biofilm antibiotic susceptibility testing: a better predictor of clinical response in cystic fibrosis exacerbations.

作者信息

Keays Tara, Ferris Wendy, Vandemheen Katherine L, Chan Francis, Yeung Sau-Wai, Mah Thien-Fah, Ramotar Karam, Saginur Raphael, Aaron Shawn D

机构信息

The Ottawa Health Research Institute, University of Ottawa, ON, Canada.

出版信息

J Cyst Fibros. 2009 Mar;8(2):122-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2008.10.005. Epub 2008 Dec 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.jcf.2008.10.005
PMID:19064337
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Bacteria grow as biofilms within CF airways. However, antibiotic susceptibility testing is routinely performed on planktonically-growing bacteria. This study assessed whether CF patients infected with multiresistant organisms had improved clinical outcomes if given antibiotics that inhibited their biofilm-grown bacteria.

METHODS

110 patients with pulmonary exacerbations were treated with intravenous antibiotics based on susceptibility testing of planktonically-growing bacteria. A retrospective analysis was done using bacterial isolates grown from their sputum at exacerbation. Each isolate was grown as a biofilm and combination antibiotic susceptibility testing was performed. Clinical outcomes in patients treated with biofilm-susceptible antibiotics were compared to those that were not.

RESULTS

66 of 110 patients (60%) were treated with antibiotic combinations that inhibited all of their planktonically-grown bacterial isolates, however, when the same isolates were grown as biofilms, only 24 patients (22%) had all of their biofilm-grown isolates remaining susceptible to the antibiotics (P=<0.001 ). When patients with at least one biofilm-grown susceptible isolate (n=61) were compared to those with none (n=49), there was a significant decrease in sputum bacterial density (P=0.02) and length of stay (P=0.04) and a non-significant decrease in treatment failure. Survival analyses of time to next exacerbation showed non-significant trends favoring patients treated with biofilm-effective antibiotics.

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients with CF exacerbations do not receive antibiotics that inhibit all biofilm-grown bacteria from their sputum at exacerbation. Patients treated with biofilm-effective therapy seemed to have improved clinical outcomes.

摘要

背景

细菌在囊性纤维化(CF)气道内以生物被膜的形式生长。然而,抗生素敏感性测试通常是针对浮游生长的细菌进行的。本研究评估了感染多重耐药菌的CF患者使用能抑制其生物被膜生长细菌的抗生素后,临床结局是否有所改善。

方法

110例肺部病情加重的患者根据浮游生长细菌的药敏试验接受静脉抗生素治疗。利用病情加重时从痰液中分离出的细菌进行回顾性分析。每种分离菌均培养成生物被膜,并进行联合抗生素敏感性测试。将接受生物被膜敏感抗生素治疗的患者的临床结局与未接受该治疗的患者进行比较。

结果

110例患者中有66例(60%)接受了能抑制其所有浮游生长细菌分离株的抗生素联合治疗,然而,当相同的分离菌培养成生物被膜时,只有24例患者(22%)的所有生物被膜生长分离株仍对这些抗生素敏感(P<0.001)。将至少有一株生物被膜生长敏感分离株的患者(n=61)与没有此类分离株的患者(n=49)进行比较,痰液细菌密度显著降低(P=0.02),住院时间显著缩短(P=0.04),治疗失败率有非显著性降低。对下次病情加重时间的生存分析显示,倾向于接受生物被膜有效抗生素治疗患者的趋势不显著。

结论

大多数CF病情加重的患者在病情加重时未接受能抑制痰液中所有生物被膜生长细菌的抗生素治疗。接受生物被膜有效治疗的患者临床结局似乎有所改善。

相似文献

1
A retrospective analysis of biofilm antibiotic susceptibility testing: a better predictor of clinical response in cystic fibrosis exacerbations.生物膜抗生素敏感性测试的回顾性分析:囊性纤维化急性加重期临床反应的更好预测指标
J Cyst Fibros. 2009 Mar;8(2):122-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2008.10.005. Epub 2008 Dec 7.
2
Antibiotic susceptabilities of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates derived from patients with cystic fibrosis under aerobic, anaerobic, and biofilm conditions.囊性纤维化患者来源的铜绿假单胞菌分离株在需氧、厌氧和生物膜条件下的抗生素敏感性
J Clin Microbiol. 2005 Oct;43(10):5085-90. doi: 10.1128/JCM.43.10.5085-5090.2005.
3
Antibiotic synergy testing should not be routine for patients with cystic fibrosis who are infected with multiresistant bacterial organisms.对于感染多重耐药菌的囊性纤维化患者,抗生素协同试验不应作为常规检查。
Paediatr Respir Rev. 2007 Sep;8(3):256-61. doi: 10.1016/j.prrv.2007.04.005. Epub 2007 Jun 6.
4
Combination antibiotic susceptibility testing to treat exacerbations of cystic fibrosis associated with multiresistant bacteria: a randomised, double-blind, controlled clinical trial.联合抗生素敏感性试验治疗多重耐药菌相关的囊性纤维化急性加重:一项随机、双盲、对照临床试验。
Lancet. 2005;366(9484):463-71. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67060-2.
5
Standard versus biofilm antimicrobial susceptibility testing to guide antibiotic therapy in cystic fibrosis.标准抗菌药敏试验与生物膜抗菌药敏试验在指导囊性纤维化抗生素治疗中的应用
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Mar 5(3):CD009528. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009528.pub3.
6
Standard versus biofilm antimicrobial susceptibility testing to guide antibiotic therapy in cystic fibrosis.标准抗菌药敏试验与生物膜抗菌药敏试验用于指导囊性纤维化患者的抗生素治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 5;10(10):CD009528. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009528.pub4.
7
Standard versus biofilm antimicrobial susceptibility testing to guide antibiotic therapy in cystic fibrosis.标准抗菌药敏试验与生物膜抗菌药敏试验用于指导囊性纤维化患者的抗生素治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jun 10;6(6):CD009528. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009528.pub5.
8
Standard versus biofilm antimicrobial susceptibility testing to guide antibiotic therapy in cystic fibrosis.标准抗菌药敏试验与生物膜抗菌药敏试验在指导囊性纤维化患者抗生素治疗中的应用
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Nov 14;11:CD009528. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009528.pub2.
9
How much do Pseudomonas biofilms contribute to symptoms of pulmonary exacerbation in cystic fibrosis?铜绿假单胞菌生物膜对囊性纤维化患者肺部病情加重症状的影响有多大?
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2005 Jun;39(6):504-6. doi: 10.1002/ppul.20220.
10
Randomized controlled trial of biofilm antimicrobial susceptibility testing in cystic fibrosis patients.囊性纤维化患者生物膜抗菌药敏试验的随机对照试验
J Cyst Fibros. 2015 Mar;14(2):262-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2014.09.013. Epub 2014 Oct 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Cystic Fibrosis Microbiome-directed Antibiotic Therapy Trial in Exacerbations Results Stratified (CFMATTERS): results of a multicentre randomised controlled trial.囊性纤维化微生物群导向的抗生素治疗急性加重期试验结果分层研究(CFMATTERS):一项多中心随机对照试验的结果
Eur Respir J. 2025 Aug 8;66(2). doi: 10.1183/13993003.02443-2024. Print 2025 Aug.
2
Practical Guidance for Clinical Microbiology Laboratories: Updated guidance for processing respiratory tract samples from people with cystic fibrosis.临床微生物学实验室实用指南:更新的囊性纤维化患者呼吸道样本处理指南。
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2024 Sep 12;37(3):e0021521. doi: 10.1128/cmr.00215-21. Epub 2024 Aug 19.
3
Deciphering the crosstalk between inflammation and biofilm in chronic wound healing: Phytocompounds loaded bionanomaterials as therapeutics.
解读慢性伤口愈合中炎症与生物膜之间的相互作用:负载植物化合物的生物纳米材料作为治疗手段
Saudi J Biol Sci. 2024 Apr;31(4):103963. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2024.103963. Epub 2024 Feb 23.
4
Biofilm antimicrobial susceptibility testing: where are we and where could we be going?生物膜抗菌药敏试验:我们现在在哪里,我们可以去哪里?
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2023 Dec 20;36(4):e0002423. doi: 10.1128/cmr.00024-23. Epub 2023 Oct 9.
5
Comparison of the Patency and Regenerative Potential of Biodegradable Vascular Prostheses of Different Polymer Compositions in an Ovine Model.不同聚合物组成的可生物降解血管假体在羊模型中的通畅性和再生潜力比较。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 May 10;24(10):8540. doi: 10.3390/ijms24108540.
6
Polymicrobial Infections and Biofilms: Clinical Significance and Eradication Strategies.多重微生物感染与生物膜:临床意义及根除策略
Antibiotics (Basel). 2022 Dec 1;11(12):1731. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11121731.
7
Transcriptional Profiling of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infections.铜绿假单胞菌感染的转录组学分析。
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2022;1386:303-323. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-08491-1_11.
8
Is More Tolerant Under Biofilm Than Under Planktonic Growth Conditions: A Multi-Isolate Survey.在生物膜中比在浮游生长条件下更具耐受性:多株调查。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022 Feb 28;12:851784. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.851784. eCollection 2022.
9
Modulated Response of and to Antimicrobial Agents in Polymicrobial Biofilm.多微生物生物膜中抗菌剂对 和 的调节反应。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2020 Oct 6;10:574028. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2020.574028. eCollection 2020.
10
Biofilm Formation and Antibiotic Resistance Phenotype of Clinical Isolates.临床分离株的生物膜形成与抗生素耐药表型。
Toxins (Basel). 2020 Jul 24;12(8):473. doi: 10.3390/toxins12080473.