Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Department of Infection Prevention and Control, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA.
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2024 Sep 12;37(3):e0021521. doi: 10.1128/cmr.00215-21. Epub 2024 Aug 19.
SUMMARYThis guidance presents recommendations for clinical microbiology laboratories for processing respiratory samples from people with cystic fibrosis (pwCF). Appropriate processing of respiratory samples is crucial to detect bacterial and fungal pathogens, guide treatment, monitor the epidemiology of cystic fibrosis (CF) pathogens, and assess therapeutic interventions. Thanks to CF transmembrane conductance regulator modulator therapy, the health of pwCF has improved, but as a result, fewer pwCF spontaneously expectorate sputum. Thus, the collection of sputum samples has decreased, while the collection of other types of respiratory samples such as oropharyngeal and bronchoalveolar lavage samples has increased. To optimize the detection of microorganisms, including , , , and complex; other less common non-lactose fermenting Gram-negative bacilli, e.g., , , , , and species; and yeasts and filamentous fungi, non-selective and selective culture media are recommended for all types of respiratory samples, including samples obtained from pwCF after lung transplantation. There are no consensus recommendations for laboratory practices to detect, characterize, and report small colony variants (SCVs) of , although studies are ongoing to address the potential clinical impact of SCVs. Accurate identification of less common Gram-negative bacilli, e.g., , , , , and species, as well as yeasts and filamentous fungi, is recommended to understand their epidemiology and clinical importance in pwCF. However, conventional biochemical tests and automated platforms may not accurately identify CF pathogens. MALDI-TOF MS provides excellent genus-level identification, but databases may lack representation of CF pathogens to the species-level. Thus, DNA sequence analysis should be routinely available to laboratories for selected clinical circumstances. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) is not recommended for every routine surveillance culture obtained from pwCF, although selective AST may be helpful, e.g., for unusual pathogens or exacerbations unresponsive to initial therapy. While this guidance reflects current care paradigms for pwCF, recommendations will continue to evolve as CF research expands the evidence base for laboratory practices.
摘要
本指南针对处理囊性纤维化 (CF) 患者呼吸道样本的临床微生物学实验室提出了建议。适当处理呼吸道样本对于检测细菌和真菌病原体、指导治疗、监测 CF 病原体的流行病学以及评估治疗干预至关重要。由于 CF 跨膜电导调节剂治疗的应用,CF 患者的健康状况得到了改善,但随之而来的是,较少的 CF 患者会自发咳痰。因此,痰样本的采集量减少了,而其他类型的呼吸道样本(如咽拭子和支气管肺泡灌洗液样本)的采集量增加了。为了优化微生物的检测,包括 、 、 、 复合体;其他较少见的非乳糖发酵革兰氏阴性杆菌,如 、 、 、 、 种;以及酵母菌和丝状真菌,推荐对所有类型的呼吸道样本(包括肺移植后 CF 患者的样本)使用非选择性和选择性培养基。虽然正在进行研究以解决 SCVs 的潜在临床影响,但对于检测、鉴定和报告 小菌落变异体 (SCVs) 的实验室实践,尚无共识建议。建议准确鉴定较少见的革兰氏阴性杆菌,如 、 、 、 、 种,以及酵母菌和丝状真菌,以了解它们在 CF 患者中的流行病学和临床重要性。然而,常规的生化试验和自动化平台可能无法准确鉴定 CF 病原体。基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间质谱(MALDI-TOF MS)可提供出色的属水平鉴定,但数据库可能缺乏 CF 病原体的种水平代表。因此,对于某些临床情况,实验室应常规提供 DNA 序列分析。不建议对 CF 患者的常规监测培养物进行药敏试验 (AST),尽管选择性 AST 可能会有所帮助,例如对于不常见的病原体或对初始治疗无反应的加重期。尽管本指南反映了目前 CF 患者的护理模式,但随着 CF 研究扩展实验室实践的证据基础,建议将继续发展。