• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

语义知识在视觉搜索中的自上而下效应受认知负荷而非知觉负荷的调节。

Top-down effects of semantic knowledge in visual search are modulated by cognitive but not perceptual load.

作者信息

Belke Eva, Humphreys Glyn W, Watson Derrick G, Meyer Antje S, Telling Anna L

机构信息

University of Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany.

出版信息

Percept Psychophys. 2008 Nov;70(8):1444-58. doi: 10.3758/PP.70.8.1444.

DOI:10.3758/PP.70.8.1444
PMID:19064489
Abstract

Moores, Laiti, and Chelazzi (2003) found semantic interference from associate competitors during visual object search, demonstrating the existence of top-down semantic influences on the deployment of attention to objects. We examined whether effects of semantically related competitors (same-category members or associates) interacted with the effects of perceptual or cognitive load. We failed to find any interaction between competitor effects and perceptual load. However, the competitor effects increased significantly when participants were asked to retain one or five digits in memory throughout the search task. Analyses of eye movements and viewing times showed that a cognitive load did not affect the initial allocation of attention but rather the time it took participants to accept or reject an object as the target. We discuss the implications of our findings for theories of conceptual short-term memory and visual attention.

摘要

穆尔斯、莱蒂和凯拉齐(2003年)发现在视觉物体搜索过程中存在来自相关竞争者的语义干扰,这表明自上而下的语义影响在对物体的注意力分配中存在。我们研究了语义相关竞争者(同一类别成员或相关事物)的影响是否与感知或认知负荷的影响相互作用。我们没有发现竞争者效应与感知负荷之间存在任何相互作用。然而,当要求参与者在整个搜索任务中记住一位或五位数字时,竞争者效应显著增加。对眼动和注视时间的分析表明,认知负荷并不影响注意力的初始分配,而是影响参与者将一个物体接受或拒绝为目标所花费的时间。我们讨论了我们的发现对概念性短期记忆和视觉注意力理论的意义。

相似文献

1
Top-down effects of semantic knowledge in visual search are modulated by cognitive but not perceptual load.语义知识在视觉搜索中的自上而下效应受认知负荷而非知觉负荷的调节。
Percept Psychophys. 2008 Nov;70(8):1444-58. doi: 10.3758/PP.70.8.1444.
2
Sensory load incurs conceptual processing costs.感官负荷会产生概念处理成本。
Cognition. 2008 Nov;109(2):287-94. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.09.004. Epub 2008 Nov 8.
3
Perceptual load interacts with stimulus processing across sensory modalities.知觉负载与跨感觉通道的刺激处理相互作用。
Eur J Neurosci. 2009 Jun;29(12):2426-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2009.06774.x. Epub 2009 May 26.
4
Does gravity matter? Effects of semantic and syntactic inconsistencies on the allocation of attention during scene perception.重力重要吗?语义和句法不一致对场景感知过程中注意力分配的影响。
J Vis. 2009 Mar 27;9(3):24.1-15. doi: 10.1167/9.3.24.
5
Feature-based memory-driven attentional capture: visual working memory content affects visual attention.基于特征的记忆驱动注意捕获:视觉工作记忆内容影响视觉注意。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2006 Oct;32(5):1243-65. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.32.5.1243.
6
On the flexibility of grammatical advance planning during sentence production: Effects of cognitive load on multiple lexical access.在句子生成过程中语法提前规划的灵活性:认知负荷对多词汇通达的影响。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2010 Mar;36(2):423-40. doi: 10.1037/a0018619.
7
Do the contents of working memory capture attention? Yes, but cognitive control matters.工作记忆的内容会吸引注意力吗?答案是肯定的,但认知控制也很重要。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009 Oct;35(5):1292-302. doi: 10.1037/a0016452.
8
Prioritization of new objects in real-world scenes: evidence from eye movements.现实场景中新物体的优先级:来自眼动的证据。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2005 Oct;31(5):857-68. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.31.5.857.
9
Word meaning and the control of eye fixation: semantic competitor effects and the visual world paradigm.词义与眼动注视控制:语义竞争效应与视觉世界范式
Cognition. 2005 May;96(1):B23-32. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.10.003. Epub 2004 Dec 23.
10
Looking for answers: eye movements in non-visual cognitive tasks.寻找答案:非视觉认知任务中的眼动
Brain Cogn. 2007 Jun;64(1):7-20. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2006.10.001. Epub 2006 Nov 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Task-irrelevant semantic relationship between objects and scene influence attentional allocation.物体与场景之间与任务无关的语义关系会影响注意力分配。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 7;14(1):13175. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-62867-6.
2
Effect of Target Semantic Consistency in Different Sequence Positions and Processing Modes on T2 Recognition: Integration and Suppression Based on Cross-Modal Processing.不同序列位置和加工模式下目标语义一致性对T2识别的影响:基于跨模态加工的整合与抑制
Brain Sci. 2023 Feb 16;13(2):340. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13020340.
3
Generalisation of value-based attentional priority is category-specific.
基于价值的注意力优先级的泛化是特定于类别。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2023 Oct;76(10):2401-2409. doi: 10.1177/17470218221144318. Epub 2022 Dec 27.
4
Low-level factors increase gaze-guidance under cognitive load: A comparison of image-salience and semantic-salience models.低水平因素在认知负荷下增加注视引导:图像显著性和语义显著性模型的比较。
PLoS One. 2022 Nov 28;17(11):e0277691. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277691. eCollection 2022.
5
The time course of categorical and perceptual similarity effects in visual search.视觉搜索中类别和知觉相似性效应的时程。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2022 Oct;48(10):1069-1082. doi: 10.1037/xhp0001034. Epub 2022 Aug 11.
6
Language is activated by visual input regardless of memory demands or capacity.语言的激活不受记忆需求或容量的影响,而是由视觉输入决定的。
Cognition. 2022 May;222:104994. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104994. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
7
The past, present, and future of selection history.选择史的过去、现在和未来。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021 Nov;130:326-350. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.09.004. Epub 2021 Sep 6.
8
Task-Irrelevant Semantic Properties of Objects Impinge on Sensory Representations within the Early Visual Cortex.物体的任务无关语义属性影响早期视觉皮层内的感觉表征。
Cereb Cortex Commun. 2021 Aug 10;2(3):tgab049. doi: 10.1093/texcom/tgab049. eCollection 2021.
9
Cognitive load influences oculomotor behavior in natural scenes.认知负荷会影响自然场景中的眼球运动行为。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jun 11;11(1):12405. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-91845-5.
10
Extra-foveal Processing of Object Semantics Guides Early Overt Attention During Visual Search.物体语义的中央凹外加工在视觉搜索过程中引导早期显性注意。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020 Feb;82(2):655-670. doi: 10.3758/s13414-019-01906-1.