• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Language is activated by visual input regardless of memory demands or capacity.语言的激活不受记忆需求或容量的影响,而是由视觉输入决定的。
Cognition. 2022 May;222:104994. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104994. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
2
Implicit object naming in visual search: Evidence from phonological competition.视觉搜索中的内隐物体命名:来自语音竞争的证据。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2016 Nov;78(8):2633-2654. doi: 10.3758/s13414-016-1184-6.
3
Visual and linguistic cues to graspable objects.可抓取物体的视觉和语言线索。
Exp Brain Res. 2013 Sep;229(4):545-59. doi: 10.1007/s00221-013-3616-z. Epub 2013 Jul 3.
4
Looking, language, and memory: bridging research from the visual world and visual search paradigms.视觉、语言与记忆:架起视觉世界与视觉搜索范式研究之间的桥梁
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2011 Jun;137(2):138-50. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.07.013. Epub 2010 Sep 3.
5
How a picture becomes a word: individual differences in the development of language-mediated visual search.图片如何变成文字:语言介导的视觉搜索发展中的个体差异。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2021 Jan 4;6(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s41235-020-00268-9.
6
Memory after visual search: Overlapping phonology, shared meaning, and bilingual experience influence what we remember.视觉搜索后的记忆:语音重叠、共享意义和双语经验影响我们的记忆内容。
Brain Lang. 2021 Nov;222:105012. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2021.105012. Epub 2021 Aug 28.
7
More target features in visual working memory leads to poorer search guidance: evidence from contralateral delay activity.视觉工作记忆中更多的目标特征会导致搜索引导变差:来自对侧延迟活动的证据。
J Vis. 2014 Mar 5;14(3):8. doi: 10.1167/14.3.8.
8
Activation of phonological competitors in visual search.视觉搜索中语音竞争者的激活
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2013 Jun;143(2):168-75. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.03.006. Epub 2013 Apr 10.
9
How Auditory Experience Differentially Influences the Function of Left and Right Superior Temporal Cortices.听觉体验如何差异地影响左右颞上叶皮质的功能。
J Neurosci. 2017 Sep 27;37(39):9564-9573. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0846-17.2017. Epub 2017 Aug 18.
10
Visual and linguistic components of short-term memory: Generalized Neural Model (GNM) for spoken and sign languages.视觉和语言成分的短期记忆:口语和手语的广义神经模型 (GNM)。
Cortex. 2019 Mar;112:69-79. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2018.05.020. Epub 2018 Jun 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Consequences of Bilingual Language Co-Activation for Higher-Order Cognition.双语语言共同激活对高阶认知的影响。
Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2025 May 20. doi: 10.1177/09637214251339455.
2
Language experience influences performance on the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery: A cluster analysis.语言经验会影响美国国立卫生研究院工具箱认知电池测试的表现:一项聚类分析。
Humanit Soc Sci Commun. 2025;12(1). doi: 10.1057/s41599-025-04360-7. Epub 2025 Jan 18.
3
Speakers of different languages remember visual scenes differently.不同语言的使用者对视觉场景的记忆方式不同。
Sci Adv. 2023 Aug 18;9(33):eadh0064. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adh0064. Epub 2023 Aug 16.
4
People solve rebuses unwittingly-Both forward and backward: Empirical evidence for the mental effectiveness of the signifier.人们在不知不觉中解决画谜——无论是正向还是反向:关于能指心理效能的实证证据。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2023 Feb 10;16:965183. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.965183. eCollection 2022.
5
Predictors of language proficiency and cultural identification in heritage bilinguals.双语传承者语言能力和文化认同的预测因素
Front Commun (Lausanne). 2022;7. doi: 10.3389/fcomm.2022.994709. Epub 2022 Aug 31.
6
Inverse forgetting in unconscious episodic memory.无意识情节记忆中的反向遗忘。
Sci Rep. 2022 Nov 29;12(1):20595. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-25100-w.
7
How a picture becomes a word: individual differences in the development of language-mediated visual search.图片如何变成文字:语言介导的视觉搜索发展中的个体差异。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2021 Jan 4;6(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s41235-020-00268-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Effects of Language on Visual Perception.语言对视觉感知的影响。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2020 Nov;24(11):930-944. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2020.08.005. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
2
Implicit object naming in visual search: Evidence from phonological competition.视觉搜索中的内隐物体命名:来自语音竞争的证据。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2016 Nov;78(8):2633-2654. doi: 10.3758/s13414-016-1184-6.
3
Speakers of different languages process the visual world differently.说不同语言的人对视觉世界的处理方式不同。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2015 Jun;144(3):539-50. doi: 10.1037/xge0000075.
4
SUBTLEX-UK: a new and improved word frequency database for British English.SUBTLEX-UK:一个全新且经过改进的英式英语词汇频率数据库。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2014;67(6):1176-90. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2013.850521. Epub 2014 Jan 13.
5
Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal.用于验证性假设检验的随机效应结构:保持其最大化。
J Mem Lang. 2013 Apr;68(3). doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001.
6
Activation of phonological competitors in visual search.视觉搜索中语音竞争者的激活
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2013 Jun;143(2):168-75. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.03.006. Epub 2013 Apr 10.
7
Vision assessment using the NIH Toolbox.使用 NIH 工具包进行视力评估。
Neurology. 2013 Mar 12;80(11 Suppl 3):S37-40. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182876e0a.
8
CLEARPOND: cross-linguistic easy-access resource for phonological and orthographic neighborhood densities.CLEARPOND:用于语音和正字法邻域密度的跨语言便捷获取资源。
PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e43230. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043230. Epub 2012 Aug 20.
9
Age-of-acquisition ratings for 30,000 English words.30000 个英语单词的习得年龄评级。
Behav Res Methods. 2012 Dec;44(4):978-90. doi: 10.3758/s13428-012-0210-4.
10
Self-directed speech affects visual search performance.自我引导式言语会影响视觉搜索表现。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2012;65(6):1068-85. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2011.647039. Epub 2012 Apr 10.

语言的激活不受记忆需求或容量的影响,而是由视觉输入决定的。

Language is activated by visual input regardless of memory demands or capacity.

机构信息

Northwestern University, United States.

Northwestern University, United States.

出版信息

Cognition. 2022 May;222:104994. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104994. Epub 2022 Jan 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104994
PMID:35016119
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8898262/
Abstract

In the present study, we provide compelling evidence that viewing objects automatically activates linguistic labels and that this activation is not due to task-specific memory demands. In two experiments, eye-movements of English speakers were tracked while they identified a visual target among an array of four images, including a phonological competitor (e.g., flower-flag). Experiment 1 manipulated the capacity to subvocally rehearse the target label by imposing linguistic, spatial, or no working memory load. Experiment 2 manipulated the need to encode target objects by presenting target images either before or concurrently with the search display. While the timing and magnitude of competitor activation varied across conditions, we observed consistent evidence of language activation regardless of the capacity or need to maintain object labels in memory. We propose that language activation is automatic and not contingent upon working memory capacity or demands, and conclude that objects' labels influence visual search.

摘要

在本研究中,我们提供了令人信服的证据,表明观看物体自动激活语言标签,而这种激活不是由于特定任务的记忆需求。在两项实验中,我们跟踪了英语使用者的眼动,让他们在一组四张图像中识别一个视觉目标,包括一个语音竞争对手(例如,花旗)。实验 1 通过施加语言、空间或无工作记忆负荷来操纵对目标标签进行内心默读的能力。实验 2 通过在呈现搜索显示之前或同时呈现目标图像来操纵对目标对象进行编码的需求。虽然竞争对象的激活时间和幅度因条件而异,但我们观察到无论记忆中保持对象标签的能力或需求如何,语言激活的一致证据。我们提出语言激活是自动的,不依赖于工作记忆容量或需求,并得出结论,对象的标签会影响视觉搜索。