Juszkat R, Blaszak M A, Majewska N, Majewski W
Department of Radiology, K. Marcinkowski Medical University, Poznan, Poland.
Health Phys. 2009 Jan;96(1):13-8. doi: 10.1097/01.HP.0000326445.75429.a2.
Complex analysis of the fluoroscopy time, exposure time, air kerma values and dose-area product (DAP) has been carried out for a very large group of patients (655) undergoing digital subtraction angiography (DSA) for abdominal aorta and lower limb examinations. Measurements have been performed for 206 patients with intravenous (IV DSA) and 449 patients with intra-arterial (IA DSA) contrast administration. The results obtained by the two variations of the DSA technique have been compared. Median DAP values for fluoroscopy are 5.4 (IA DSA) and 3.2 (IV DSA) Gy cm and for exposure are 51.7 and 66.3 Gy cm2, respectively. A good correlation between the exposure time and DAP has been found for the two types of examinations: IA DSA (r = 0.78) and IV DSA (r = 0.8). However, the correlation of fluoroscopy time and DAP has been insignificant, and the correlation coefficient is 0.39 for IA DSA and 0.63 for IV DSA. The DAP and the time exposure ratio have been significant factors differentiating these two methods. In fluoroscopy patients obtained higher doses in IA DSA, while in exposure doses were higher in IV DSA. Measurements of DAP can be a simple and accurate method for estimation of the stochastic radiation risk to the patients.
对接受腹主动脉和下肢数字减影血管造影(DSA)检查的一大组患者(655例)的透视时间、曝光时间、空气比释动能值和剂量面积乘积(DAP)进行了综合分析。对206例接受静脉注射(IV DSA)造影剂和449例接受动脉内注射(IA DSA)造影剂的患者进行了测量。比较了DSA技术的两种变体所获得的结果。透视的DAP中位数在IA DSA中为5.4 Gy cm,在IV DSA中为3.2 Gy cm,曝光的DAP中位数分别为51.7和66.3 Gy cm²。在两种类型的检查中,曝光时间与DAP之间都发现了良好的相关性:IA DSA(r = 0.78)和IV DSA(r = 0.8)。然而,透视时间与DAP的相关性不显著,IA DSA的相关系数为0.39,IV DSA的相关系数为0.63。DAP和时间曝光比是区分这两种方法的重要因素。在透视中,IA DSA的患者接受的剂量更高,而在曝光中,IV DSA的剂量更高。DAP测量可以是一种简单而准确的方法,用于估计患者的随机辐射风险。