• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

国立癌症研究所癌症中心对患有肺癌、乳腺癌、结直肠癌或前列腺癌的医疗保险患者就诊情况的影响因素

Determinants of NCI Cancer Center attendance in Medicare patients with lung, breast, colorectal, or prostate cancer.

作者信息

Onega Tracy, Duell Eric J, Shi Xun, Demidenko Eugene, Goodman David

机构信息

The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, NH, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2009 Feb;24(2):205-10. doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0863-y. Epub 2008 Dec 6.

DOI:10.1007/s11606-008-0863-y
PMID:19067086
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2628988/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Geographic access to NCI-Cancer Centers varies by region, race/ethnicity, and place of residence, but utilization of these specialized centers has not been examined at the national level in the U.S. This study identified determinants of NCI-Cancer Center attendance in Medicare cancer patients.

METHODS

SEER-Medicare (Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results) data were used to identify individuals with an incident cancer of the breast, lung, colon/rectum, or prostate from 1998-2002. NCI-Cancer Center attendance was determined based on utilization claims from 1998-2003. Demographic, clinical, and geographic factors were examined in multilevel models. We performed sensitivity analyses for the NCI-Cancer Center attendance definition.

RESULTS

Overall, 7.3% of this SEER-Medicare cohort (N = 211,048) attended an NCI-Cancer Center. Travel-time to the nearest NCI-Cancer Center was inversely related to attendance, showing 11% decreased likelihood of attendance for every 10 minutes of additional travel-time (OR = 0.89, 95%CI 0.88-0.90). Receiving predominantly generalist care prior to diagnosis was associated with a lower likelihood of attendance (OR = 0.79, 95%CI 0.77-0.82). The other factors associated with greater NCI-Cancer attendance were later stage at diagnosis, fewer comorbidities, and urban residence in conjunction with African-American race.

CONCLUSIONS

Attendance at NCI-Cancer Centers is low among Medicare beneficiaries, but is strongly influenced by proximity and general provider care prior to diagnosis. Other patient factors are predictive of NCI-Cancer Center attendance and may be important in better understanding cancer care utilization.

摘要

背景

美国国立癌症研究所(NCI)癌症中心的地理可及性因地区、种族/族裔和居住地而异,但这些专业中心的利用情况在美国尚未进行全国层面的研究。本研究确定了医疗保险癌症患者前往NCI癌症中心就诊的决定因素。

方法

利用监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)-医疗保险数据,识别出1998年至2002年期间患有乳腺癌、肺癌、结肠/直肠癌或前列腺癌的患者。根据1998年至2003年的利用索赔确定NCI癌症中心的就诊情况。在多水平模型中检查人口统计学、临床和地理因素。我们对NCI癌症中心就诊定义进行了敏感性分析。

结果

总体而言,该SEER-医疗保险队列中的7.3%(N = 211,048)前往NCI癌症中心就诊。到最近的NCI癌症中心的旅行时间与就诊率呈负相关,每增加10分钟旅行时间,就诊可能性降低11%(OR = 0.89,95%CI 0.88 - 0.90)。诊断前主要接受全科医生治疗与就诊可能性较低相关(OR = 0.79,95%CI 0.77 - 0.82)。与更高的NCI癌症就诊率相关的其他因素包括诊断时分期较晚、合并症较少以及城市居住且为非裔美国人种族。

结论

医疗保险受益人中前往NCI癌症中心就诊的比例较低,但受到距离和诊断前一般医疗服务提供者护理的强烈影响。其他患者因素可预测NCI癌症中心的就诊情况,对于更好地理解癌症护理利用情况可能很重要。

相似文献

1
Determinants of NCI Cancer Center attendance in Medicare patients with lung, breast, colorectal, or prostate cancer.国立癌症研究所癌症中心对患有肺癌、乳腺癌、结直肠癌或前列腺癌的医疗保险患者就诊情况的影响因素
J Gen Intern Med. 2009 Feb;24(2):205-10. doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0863-y. Epub 2008 Dec 6.
2
Influence of NCI cancer center attendance on mortality in lung, breast, colorectal, and prostate cancer patients.美国国立癌症研究所癌症中心就诊对肺癌、乳腺癌、结直肠癌和前列腺癌患者死亡率的影响。
Med Care Res Rev. 2009 Oct;66(5):542-60. doi: 10.1177/1077558709335536. Epub 2009 May 19.
3
Race versus place of service in mortality among medicare beneficiaries with cancer.医疗保险受益人群癌症死亡率的种族差异与服务地点差异。
Cancer. 2010 Jun 1;116(11):2698-706. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25097.
4
Predictors of high-intensity care at the end of life among older adults with solid tumors: A population-based study.预测老年人实体瘤患者生命终末期高强度医疗的因素:一项基于人群的研究。
J Geriatr Oncol. 2024 Jun;15(5):101774. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2024.101774. Epub 2024 Apr 26.
5
Emergency department involvement in the diagnosis of cancer among older adults: a SEER-Medicare study.急诊科在老年癌症诊断中的作用:一项 SEER-医疗保险研究。
JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2024 Apr 30;8(3). doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkae039.
6
Annual Report to the Nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2010, featuring prevalence of comorbidity and impact on survival among persons with lung, colorectal, breast, or prostate cancer.《1975-2010 年全国癌症报告:肺癌、结直肠癌、乳腺癌和前列腺癌患者合并症的流行情况及其对生存的影响》
Cancer. 2014 May 1;120(9):1290-314. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28509. Epub 2013 Dec 16.
7
What factors influence minority use of National Cancer Institute-designated cancer centers?哪些因素影响少数民族利用美国国家癌症研究所指定癌症中心?
Cancer. 2014 Feb 1;120(3):399-407. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28413. Epub 2013 Oct 21.
8
Impact of socioeconomic status on cancer incidence and stage at diagnosis: selected findings from the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results: National Longitudinal Mortality Study.社会经济地位对癌症发病率及诊断时分期的影响:来自监测、流行病学及最终结果:国家纵向死亡率研究的选定发现
Cancer Causes Control. 2009 May;20(4):417-35. doi: 10.1007/s10552-008-9256-0. Epub 2008 Nov 12.
9
Cancer Treatment Delays in American Indians and Alaska Natives Enrolled in Medicare.参加医疗保险的美国印第安人和阿拉斯加原住民的癌症治疗延迟情况。
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2017;28(1):350-361. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2017.0027.
10
Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2002, featuring population-based trends in cancer treatment.《1975 - 2002年全国癌症状况年度报告》,重点介绍基于人群的癌症治疗趋势。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005 Oct 5;97(19):1407-27. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dji289.

引用本文的文献

1
Racial and Ethnic Inequalities in Actual vs Nearest Delivery Hospitals.实际分娩医院与最近分娩医院中的种族和民族不平等现象。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Mar 3;8(3):e251404. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.1404.
2
Travel burden and carbon dioxide emission reductions through a model of cancer care closer to the patient.通过建立更贴近患者的癌症护理模式减轻就医负担并减少二氧化碳排放。
Oncologist. 2025 Feb 6;30(2). doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyaf021.
3
Representativeness of Patients With Lung Cancer in an Integrated Health Care Delivery System.综合医疗服务体系中肺癌患者的代表性
Perm J. 2024 Sep 16;28(3):13-22. doi: 10.7812/TPP/24.028. Epub 2024 Jun 12.
4
Cancer Treatment Closer to the Patient Reduces Travel Burden, Time Toxicity, and Improves Patient Satisfaction, Results of 546 Consecutive Patients in a Northern Italian District.意大利北部地区 546 例连续患者的结果显示,靠近患者的癌症治疗可减少旅行负担、时间毒性并提高患者满意度。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Dec 4;59(12):2121. doi: 10.3390/medicina59122121.
5
Demographic disparities in receipt of care at a comprehensive cancer center.癌症中心综合治疗中获得治疗的患者存在人口统计学差异。
Cancer Med. 2023 Jun;12(12):13687-13700. doi: 10.1002/cam4.5992. Epub 2023 Apr 28.
6
Delineation of Cancer Service Areas Anchored by Major Cancer Centers in the United States.以美国主要癌症中心为基础的癌症服务区域划定。
Cancer Res Commun. 2022 May 24;2(5):380-389. doi: 10.1158/2767-9764.CRC-22-0099. eCollection 2022 May.
7
A patient-driven clinicogenomic partnership for metastatic prostate cancer.一种针对转移性前列腺癌的患者驱动的临床基因组合作模式。
Cell Genom. 2022 Sep 14;2(9). doi: 10.1016/j.xgen.2022.100169. Epub 2022 Aug 19.
8
Distance of Residence From the Cancer Center Influences Perioperative Outcomes After Robotic-Assisted Pulmonary Lobectomy?居住距离癌症中心是否会影响机器人辅助肺叶切除术后的围手术期结果?
Cureus. 2022 Aug 31;14(8):e28646. doi: 10.7759/cureus.28646. eCollection 2022 Aug.
9
Patient and Hospital Factors Associated With Differences in Mortality Rates Among Black and White US Medicare Beneficiaries Hospitalized With COVID-19 Infection.与 COVID-19 感染住院的美国医疗保险受益的黑人和白人患者死亡率差异相关的患者和医院因素。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jun 1;4(6):e2112842. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.12842.
10
Spatial Behavior of Cancer Care Utilization in Distance Decay in the Northeast Region of the U.S.美国东北部地区癌症护理利用在距离衰减中的空间行为
Travel Behav Soc. 2021 Jul;24:291-302. doi: 10.1016/j.tbs.2021.05.003. Epub 2021 May 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Geographic access to cancer care in the U.S.美国癌症护理的地理可及性
Cancer. 2008 Feb 15;112(4):909-18. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23229.
2
Travel distance and season of diagnosis affect treatment choices for women with early-stage breast cancer in a predominantly rural population (United States).在美国以农村人口为主的地区,诊断时的旅行距离和季节会影响早期乳腺癌女性的治疗选择。
Cancer Causes Control. 2006 Aug;17(6):851-6. doi: 10.1007/s10552-006-0025-7.
3
Geographic access to health care for rural Medicare beneficiaries.农村医疗保险受益人的医疗保健地理可及性。
J Rural Health. 2006 Spring;22(2):140-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2006.00022.x.
4
Geographic patterns of advanced breast cancer in Los Angeles: associations with biological and sociodemographic factors (United States).洛杉矶晚期乳腺癌的地理分布模式:与生物学和社会人口学因素的关联(美国)
Cancer Causes Control. 2006 Apr;17(3):325-39. doi: 10.1007/s10552-005-0513-1.
5
Impact of patient distance to radiation therapy on mastectomy use in early-stage breast cancer patients.早期乳腺癌患者距离放射治疗的远近对乳房切除术使用情况的影响。
J Clin Oncol. 2005 Oct 1;23(28):7074-80. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.06.032.
6
Trends in the leading causes of death in the United States, 1970-2002.1970 - 2002年美国主要死因的趋势
JAMA. 2005 Sep 14;294(10):1255-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.10.1255.
7
Do cancer centers designated by the National Cancer Institute have better surgical outcomes?美国国立癌症研究所指定的癌症中心手术效果更好吗?
Cancer. 2005 Feb 1;103(3):435-41. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20785.
8
Rural-urban differences in cancer care: results from the Lake Superior Rural Cancer Care Project.城乡癌症护理差异:苏必利尔湖农村癌症护理项目的结果
Minn Med. 2004 Sep;87(9):44-50.
9
Who you are and where you live: how race and geography affect the treatment of medicare beneficiaries.你是谁以及你住在哪里:种族和地理位置如何影响医疗保险受益人的治疗。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2004;Suppl Variation:VAR33-44. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.var.33.
10
Racial differences in the treatment of colorectal cancer: a comparison of surgical and radiation therapy between Whites and Blacks.结直肠癌治疗中的种族差异:白人与黑人手术和放射治疗的比较。
Ann Epidemiol. 2004 Mar;14(3):215-21. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2003.08.002.