McGeer Allison J
Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, Medicine and Public Health Sciences, University of Toronto, Division of Infection Control, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Canada.
Clin Infect Dis. 2009 Jan 1;48 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S14-9. doi: 10.1086/591852.
Accumulating evidence supports the use of specific diagnostic tests and antiviral therapies for seriously ill patients with influenza. Among available diagnostic tests, reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction is faster than culture and more sensitive than commercial antigen assays. Current neuraminidase inhibitors were approved on the basis of their efficacy in ambulatory patients, but seriously ill patients who receive these agents are less likely to die, even when treatment is initiated >48 h after symptom onset. For patients hospitalized with suspected influenza, it is unclear which circumstances warrant diagnostic testing and which warrant the use of empirical therapy. Rapid antigen assays may reduce the unnecessary use of other tests and medications but are relatively insensitive, thus eliminating many patients with influenza as candidates for treatment. Empirical antiviral therapy ensures that all patients receive treatment promptly, at a cost equivalent to that of diagnostic tests alone, but results in the receipt of treatment by many patients without influenza. For patients hospitalized with suspected influenza, clinicians need to combine these approaches in order to optimize patient care.
越来越多的证据支持对重症流感患者使用特定的诊断测试和抗病毒疗法。在现有的诊断测试中,逆转录聚合酶链反应比培养法更快,比商业抗原检测更敏感。目前的神经氨酸酶抑制剂是根据其在门诊患者中的疗效获批的,但接受这些药物治疗的重症患者死亡可能性较小,即使在症状出现48小时后才开始治疗。对于因疑似流感住院的患者,尚不清楚哪些情况需要进行诊断测试,哪些情况需要进行经验性治疗。快速抗原检测可能会减少其他测试和药物的不必要使用,但相对不敏感,从而将许多流感患者排除在治疗候选者之外。经验性抗病毒治疗可确保所有患者迅速接受治疗,成本与仅进行诊断测试相当,但导致许多非流感患者接受治疗。对于因疑似流感住院的患者,临床医生需要结合这些方法以优化患者护理。