Busch Susan H, Barry Colleen L
Department of Health Policy and Administration, School of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.
Inquiry. 2008 Fall;45(3):308-22. doi: 10.5034/inquiryjrnl_45.03.308.
State mental health parity laws improve equity in private insurance coverage for mental and physical health services, but prior research shows no effect on service use. We study whether state parity differentially affects individuals by employer size since large firms are often exempt from state health mandates due to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act. We also examine whether state parity laws differentially affect use among individuals with low incomes or in poor mental health. We find that individuals in smaller firms are more likely to use services post-parity implementation and that this effect is concentrated among low-income individuals.
州心理健康平权法提高了私人保险对心理健康和身体健康服务覆盖的公平性,但先前的研究表明对服务使用没有影响。我们研究州平权法是否因雇主规模不同而对个体产生不同影响,因为根据《雇员退休收入保障法》,大公司通常可免受州健康指令的约束。我们还研究州平权法是否对低收入或心理健康状况不佳的个体的服务使用产生不同影响。我们发现,在平权法实施后,小公司的个体更有可能使用服务,且这种影响集中在低收入个体中。