Suppr超能文献

评估健康保险障碍和比较视角下的公平威胁:健康保险获取数据库。

Assessing barriers to health insurance and threats to equity in comparative perspective: the Health Insurance Access Database.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, Purvis Hall, McGill University, 1020 Pine Avenue West, Montreal, QC H3A 1A2, Canada.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Jul 10;12:107. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-107.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Typologies traditionally used for international comparisons of health systems often conflate many system characteristics. To capture policy changes over time and by service in health systems regulation of public and private insurance, we propose a database containing explicit, standardized indicators of policy instruments.

METHODS

The Health Insurance Access Database (HIAD) will collect policy information for ten OECD countries, over a range of eight health services, from 1990-2010. Policy indicators were selected through a comprehensive literature review which identified policy instruments most likely to constitute barriers to health insurance, thus potentially posing a threat to equity. As data collection is still underway, we present here the theoretical bases and methodology adopted, with a focus on the rationale underpinning the study instruments.

RESULTS

These harmonized data will allow the capture of policy changes in health systems regulation of public and private insurance over time and by service. The standardization process will permit international comparisons of systems' performance with regards to health insurance access and equity.

CONCLUSION

This research will inform and feed the current debate on the future of health care in developed countries and on the role of the private sector in these changes.

摘要

背景

传统上用于国际卫生系统比较的分类法常常将许多系统特征混为一谈。为了捕捉卫生系统中公共和私人保险监管政策随时间和服务的变化,我们提出了一个包含明确、标准化政策工具指标的数据库。

方法

《健康保险获取数据库》(HIAD)将在 1990-2010 年间,为十个经合组织国家的八项卫生服务收集政策信息。通过全面的文献回顾选择政策指标,该文献回顾确定了最有可能构成健康保险障碍的政策工具,从而可能对公平构成威胁。由于数据收集仍在进行中,我们在此介绍所采用的理论基础和方法,重点介绍研究工具的基本原理。

结果

这些协调一致的数据将能够捕捉公共和私人保险在卫生系统监管方面随时间和服务的政策变化。标准化过程将允许对各国在获得健康保险和公平方面的系统绩效进行国际比较。

结论

这项研究将为当前关于发达国家医疗保健未来以及私营部门在这些变化中的作用的辩论提供信息和支持。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ac2/3393626/9d903ed8dbd3/1472-6963-12-107-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验