University of Illinois College of Medicine at Peoria, Peoria, Illinois Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, Oregon Professional Center III, Wheeling, West Virginia University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, Texas.
J Clin Rheumatol. 1997 Dec;3(6):324-7.
Some controversy has been generated by the consensus report on fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) published in 1996 (1). The current paper examines this report and offers some additional perspectives on several issues. The consensus report was based primarily on scientific data and provided useful information on various aspects of FMS. However, it is felt that some views, e.g., those on diagnosis in a work or compensation setting, causality, and management may be misinterpreted to the detriment of patient care. Our viewpoint in this paper states that both research data and clinical experience should be used to meaningfully address different aspects of FMS covered in the consensus report. Furthermore, be-cause of continued research in FMS, the finite time limitations of the original report compiled in June of 1994, should be recognized.
一些关于纤维肌痛综合征(FMS)的共识报告(1)引起了争议。本文对该报告进行了审查,并就几个问题提出了一些其他观点。共识报告主要基于科学数据,提供了 FMS 各个方面的有用信息。然而,人们认为,某些观点,例如在工作或赔偿环境中的诊断、因果关系和管理等观点,可能会被误解,从而损害患者的护理。本文的观点认为,应该利用研究数据和临床经验来有意义地解决共识报告中涵盖的 FMS 的不同方面。此外,由于 FMS 的持续研究,应该认识到原始报告在 1994 年 6 月编写时的时间限制。